 When the brain is injured or removed, the action of the heart ceases, only because respiration is under its influence, and if, under these circumstances, respiration is artificially produced, the circulation will still continue.  London Medical and Physical Journal - Side 3091823Fuld visning - Om denne bog
 | Edward T W. Polehampton - 1815 - 728 sider
...observation has been coufirmed by some experiments which I have lately had the howxir of communicating, that the brain is not directly necessary to the action of the heart, and that when the functions of the brain are destroyed, the heart continues to contract for some time... | |
 | Joseph Adams - 1818 - 278 sider
...; and that the secretions cease when deprived of the nervous influence. Respecting the first, (that the brain is not directly necessary to the action of the heart) though only Cruikshank and Bichat are mentioned, yet Mr. Brodie's experiment in proof of it, was only... | |
 | John Ayrton Paris - 1824 - 330 sider
...upon the subject. It was observed by Bichat, (and the observation has been confirmed by Brodie) that the influence of the brain is not directly necessary...removed, the heart continues to contract for some time afterward, and then ceases only in consequence of the suspension of respiration, which is under the... | |
 | John Ayrton Paris - 1825 - 1036 sider
...its adoption. It was observed by Bichdt, and the observation has been fully confirmed by Brodie, that the influence of the brain is not directly necessary to the action of the heart ; and is immediately necessary to life, only because the muscles of respiration owe their action to... | |
 | Royal Society (Great Britain) - 1832 - 550 sider
...the air was not diffused to distant parts of the body. From the whole the author concludes, 1st. That the influence of the brain is not directly necessary to the action of the heart. 2nd. That the interruption of the circulation is owing to the stoppage of respiration. 3rd. That when... | |
 | Royal Society (Great Britain) - 1832 - 564 sider
...the air was not diffused to distant parts of the body. From the whole the author concludes, 1st. That the influence of the brain is not directly necessary to the action of the heart. 2nd. That the interruption of the circulation is owing to the stoppage of respiration. 3rd. That when... | |
 | Philip Miller - 1835 - 742 sider
...and a half afterwards, at the rate of one hundred times in a minute, from which it would seem that the brain is not directly necessary to the action of the heart, and that when that action ceases it is rather in consequence of the cessation of respiration, which... | |
 | Thomas Winter - 1847 - 362 sider
...and a half afterwards, at the rate of one hundred times in the minute, from which it would seem that the brain is not directly necessary to the action of the heart, and when that action ceases, it is rather in consequence of the cessation of respiration, which is... | |
 | American Medical Association - 1858 - 1096 sider
...separation of the brain. These experiments confirmed the observations of Mr. Cruikshank* and M. Bichat3 that the brain is not directly necessary to the action of the heart, and that when the functions of the brain are destroyed, the circulation ceases only in consequence... | |
 | 1863 - 714 sider
...destroyed, the action of the heart only ceases because respiration is suspended; in other words, that the brain is not directly necessary to the action of the heart, though the lungs are so to that action in the higher animals. And so, the circulation of the blood... | |
| |
