Kyrie eleison, how long used in the Roman liturgy, i. 122. Language of the liturgy, see Unknown tongues.
Laodicea, council of, when held, i. 106. the 19th canon re- markable for its directions relative to the liturgy, ibid. probably established the great oriental rite, instead of one resembling the Gal- lican, 107-110. Lauds, how ancient as an hour
of prayer, i. 203. joined to nocturns, ibid. Law, commonly called the
commandments, read in the English liturgy, ii. 27, &c. antiquity of the custom, 27, 28. the church of England justified for using always the same portion of scripture, 29, 30. its division into verses justified, 31, 32. where it was originally read, 32, 33. example of similar di- vision in the ancient Eng- lish formularies, 31, 33, 34. Lectionary, what it was, i. 308. Leo the Great, Bp. of Rome,
his additions to the Roman canon, and sacramentary, i. 117, 118.
Leo Thuscus, his translation of
Chrysostom's liturgy, i. 74. Leonian sacramentary, how an- cient, i. 117. when first printed, ibid.
Lesleus, his edition of the Mos-
arabic or Spanish missal re- commended, i. 172. Lessons, in morning prayer, their antiquity, i. 225. for- merly very short in the church of England, 226. po- sition of first lesson ancient, ibid. second lesson defended by practice of Egyptian church, 231, 232.
Lessons in the evening prayer,
i. 255, 256. Lincoln, its " i. 186, 187. Linen cloth, termed corporale, sindon, or eiλŋtòv, when laid on the holy table, ii. 72. Litany, used in various senses by ancient writers, i. 264- 267. antiquity of special sup- plications, 267-272. cus- tomary in the time of Basil, 268. peculiar days of litany or rogation in Gaul, &c. 270. Litania Major of Rome, 271. eastern days of litany, 272. service performed in litanies, 272, &c. allusions to it in Basil, 273. Sozomen, 274. Sidonius, Avitus, &c. 274, 275. Roman litanies, 276. Constantinopolitan, ib. no invocations of saints in eastern litanies, 276, 277. nor anciently in western, 277-281. form of litany prayers derived from the eastern church, 281, 282. Kyrie eleison formerly used instead of the invocations of saints, 282, &c. anthems sung in the procession, 283, &c. litanies of England, 285, 286. litany prayers, as used by the church, justified, 286, 287. their form and sub- stance, how ancient, 287, 288. the church justified for removing invocations of saints from her litanies, 288 -292. the English litany compared with ancient texts, 292-301.
use," or custom,
the lesser, in morning prayer, i. 239.
Liturgy, meaning of the term, i. 3.
Liturgies, short account of their
publication during the three
last centuries, i. 3, 4. rea- sons why there are preju- dices against them, 4, 5. course pursued in investi- gating their original, 6, 7. four great primitive liturgies, where used, 8. when com- mitted to writing, 11. their value difficult to estimate, ibid. what it is, 12, 13. Lord's Prayer, in morning prayer, i. 215. not origin- ally used at the beginning of the service, 216. when this custom was introduced, 217. when first adopted in Roman breviary, ibid. at the beginning of communion ser- vice, whence derived, ii. 23 -25. not essential to re- peat it after consecration, 149. ancient liturgies which do not prescribe it in that place, 149, 150. repeated by all the people, 155. joined to canon of Roman liturgy by Gregory the Great, i. 114. Magnificat, its ancient use in
the service, i. 255. Mahommedans, their assistance to the monophysites, i. 82. their persecution of the or- thodox, 93.
Malabar, liturgies of the Chris- tians of, i. 197. Mamertus, of Vienne, litanies or rogations instituted by him on the three days before Ascension, i. 270. Manual, what, ii. 166. MARK, St., liturgy of, when and where discovered and print- ed, i. 85. proved to have belonged to the church of Alexandria, 86. testimonies to its use in Egypt in the twelfth century, 87. and in the seventh, 87, 88. proved to be derived from original
Alexandrian rite, by its con- formity with liturgy of Cy- ril, and Ethiopic, 89, &c. disputes as to genuineness of Mark's liturgy, 91. real origin of this appellation, 92. Mark's liturgy is that of the orthodox after A. D. 451, altered to suit rites of Con- stantinople, 93. proofs of this alteration, 93—95, 99. must have been made before twelfth century, probably about eighth, 95, 96. Re- naudot's mistakes with re- gard to the liturgy of Mark, and the Coptic liturgy of Basil, 96, 97. comparison with the Coptic liturgy of Cyril, and the Ethiopic, es- tablishing primitive Alexan- drian rite, 98, 99. difference between this and the great oriental rite, 99. comparison with the writings of Egyp- tian fathers, 100—103. sum- mary of the means we have for tracing the primitive li- turgy of Alexandria, 104. Renaudot's edition and notes, 104, 105.
Martene, his work, "de Anti- quis Ecclesiæ Ritibus," com- mended, ii. 167. Martyrologium, what, i. 208. Matins, office for, compounded of nocturns and lauds, i. 202. see Nocturns, Lauds. Matrimony, performed by Chris- tian ministers from the ear- liest period, ii. 208. origin- als of our office, 209-219. Melchites, meaning of the term, i. 16.
Menezes, archbishop of Goa, i.
Metropolitans, what, i. 6. anti-
quity of the office, ibid. MILAN, liturgy of, ascribed to
Ambrose, i. 125. referred to by Walafridus, &c. ibid. its text, how ascertained, 125, 126. has been different from the Roman since the time of Gregory the Great, 126. and since fifth century at least, 126, 127. its order, 127, 128. compared with the Roman about the time of Gregory, 128-130. prayer super sin- donem, what it corresponded to in the Roman liturgy, 129. whence the liturgy of Milan was originally derived, 130, 131. its progress traced, and origin of the name of Am- brosian as applied to it, 131. The erroneous notions of Vicecomes as to its origin, 132.
Milk and honey given after
baptism, ii. 192.
Missa sicca, or dry service,
what, ii. 164. what it re- sembles in the English li- turgy, 163, &c. antiquity of the custom, 164. Durand's directions for its perform- ance, 165.
Missal, how distinguished from liturgy, i. III.
plenary, when and how formed, i. 308. Mission, of clergy, as distin- guished from their orders, ii. 247. how it is limited, and conferred, 248. the mis- sion of the British and Irish clergy proved, 248-254. replies to objections of Ro- manists, &c. 254, &c. Monastic institute, where it chiefly prevailed, i. 62. Monophysites, what, i. 15. Morning prayer, of the British church, its origin, i. 206. see Matins. Mosarabic liturgy, see SPAIN.
Nestorians, why so called, i.
194. their history alluded to, ibid. their three liturgies, 195. the liturgy of Adæus cannot be the apostolical li- turgy of Mesopotamia, 195, 196. nor the other two, ibid. Nicene Creed, see Constantino- politan.
Nocturns in morning prayer, their origin, i. 202. Nunc dimittis, antiquity of its use in the service, i. 257. Oblations offered by Christians from the earliest period, ii. 67. what they consisted of, 68. whether they were made during the liturgy in the eastern church, ibid. alter- ations and rules about them in the west, 69. relic of an- cient customs at Milan, ibid. their antiquity and fortunes in England, and Ireland, 70, 71. always preserved by us,
verbal, what, ii. 78, 79. verbal oblation in the Apo- stolical Constitutions ex- plained, 79. in Basil's litur- gy, 80. in the Alexandrian, 80, 81. in those of Milan and Rome, 81, 82. in the Constantinopolitan, 83. in those of Antioch and Jeru- salem, 83, 84. no verbal ob- lation essential, 85, 86. ver- bal oblations of the Eng- lish liturgy explained, 86, 87.
or sacrifice, proved not to be deficient in the Eng- lish liturgy, ii. 14. Occasional prayers after the morning prayer and litany, i. 301, &c. for rain—fair weather, 302. in time of dearth, 303. war, and plague, 304. ember weeks, &c. 305.
for all conditions of men, 306. Offertory anthem, how ancient, ii. 73. may be either read or chanted according to an- cient customs, 73. 74. Omophorion, what, ii. 317. Orders of the British and Irish clergy, from what apostles they descend, ii. 249. writ- ers in defence of their va- lidity, ibid. admitted to be valid by learned Romanists, 257,258. Oriental liturgy, the great, con- siderations on its prevalence, antiquity, and origin, i. 42, 71, 80. difference between it and the Gallican, 108- 110. probably established by council of Laodicea in the exarchate of Ephesus, in place of one resembling the ancient Gallican, ibid. Osculatorium, what, ii. 102. Oxford, MS. missal of, i. 188. Pall of bishops and metropo- litans, ii. 317, 318. Parker, archbishop, did not need the Roman patriarch's confirmation or ordination to the metropolis of Canter- bury, but would have been schismatical if he had ob- tained them, ii. 257-270. was ordained by bishops who had divine mission for their work, 270, &c.
Paschal controversy between the Roman and British churches, i. 155. Passionarium, what, i. 208. Pastoral staff, its antiquity, ii. 319. its figure, ibid. Pastorale, what, ii. 166. Patriarch, explanation of the
term, i. 6. authority of, how ancient, 7. Patriarchs of the church in VOL. II.
the fourth century, i. 7. Patrick, archbishop of the Irish, by whom instructed, i. 156. his labours in Ireland, 181. ordained, 185.
Pax, or, osculatorium, what, ii. 102. Peace, salutation of, in the primitive ages used in the communion service, ii. 1oI. alterations and extinction of the custom, 102. its place how supplied in the English liturgy, 103. Penitents, prayers for them in the liturgy anciently, ii. 66. public, in the pri- mitive church, their differ- ent classes, ii. 240. Peter the deacon, his quota- tions from the liturgy of Basil discussed, i. 50—53. Phenolion, what, ii. 309. Planeta, ii. 309. Pluviale, see Cope. Poderis, what, ii. 315. Pontifical, what it contained, ii. 166.
Pontus, civil diocese of, i. 45.
what ecclesiastical division it corresponded with, ibid. Pope, the title of the patriarch of Alexandria, i. 86. to whom applied in primitive times, ibid. Portiforium, see Breviary. Post-communion, thanksgiving in the liturgy, its antiquity, ii. 155-157-
Preface in the communion ser- vice, see Thanksgiving.
in the Gallican and
Spanish liturgies, i. 160-
174. Preparation of the elements, see Elements.
Priests, ordinations of, in the English ritual, ii. 300- 306.
Prime, an hour of prayer, its
antiquity, i. 203.
Processional, what, ii. 60, 166. Processions, spoken of by Basil, and introduced by Chrysos- tom, ii. 265, 266. Proclus, archbishop of Con- stantinople, tract ascribed to him probably spurious, i. 18, 73, 74, 194. Prophecy, see Epistle. Prosa, what, ii. 49. Psalmody, customs of, appoint- ed by Basil in his monaste- ries, i. 67. Psalms in morning prayer, their place justified, i. 223. their number varied in dif- ferent places, 223, 224. the British offices defended, 224. the decree of Gregory VII. of Rome on the offices null in these churches, ibid. in evening prayer, 254. num- bers of them in ancient times, and different places, ibid.
Psalter used in canonical hours, i. 207. Roman and Gallican Psalters, ibid. what the Psal- ter generally contained, ibid. Purgatory, belief in, rendered
it inexpedient to continue prayers for the departed, ii. 95. not the doctrine of the catholic church, 253, 254. Renaudot, his liturgical publica- tions, i. 4, 20, 105. his mis- takes corrected, i. 90, 94, 96, 97. Responsory, what, ii. 46. Ritual, what it contained dur-
ing the middle ages, ii. 166. of the Greek church, how it resembles that of the Eng- lish, ibid.
Rochette, its antiquity, ii. 318. Rogations, or supplications, i.
269. three rogation-days be- fore ascension, by whom in- stituted, 270. where preva- lent, 270, 271. see Litany. ROME, liturgy of, different opin- ions as to its antiquity, i. III. missal and liturgy dis- tinguished, ibid. ascribed to Gregory the Great, ibid. means of ascertaining the liturgy as used in his time, 112. Gregory the reviser and improver, not the au- thor, of it, 112, 113. this liturgy was not composed between the time of Vigilius and Gregory, 113, 114. re- ferred to by Vigilius, A. D. 538, 115.regulations of Sym- machus, ibid. Gelasius, his sacramentary, 116. Leonian sacramentary, its antiquity, 117. Leo the Great, his ad- ditions to the canon, &c. ibid. Innocentius's testimo- ny to the antiquity of the Roman liturgy, 118. its an- tiquity conjectured from the relics of the African liturgy, 119, 120. from that of Mi- lan, 120. its order before the time of Gregory the Great, 121–123. means of ascertaining the text of Gre- gory's sacramentary, 123. commentators on the Ro- man liturgy, 124.
patriarch of, his privi- leges in the primitive ages defined, ii. 259. extent of his patriarchal jurisdiction, 259, 260. had no jurisdic- tion over Britain or Ireland, 260. nor over France, ac- cording to the most learned Romanists, 262. did not ac- quire patriarchal jurisdiction over our churches by send- ing Augustine, 261, 262. had
« ForrigeFortsæt » |