fembly, or from other moft refpectable fources. We have endeavoured to flate facts with the utmost impartiality; and though we profefs to be the friends of freedom in general, the reader will find that we have not been sparing of our ftrictures on the conduct of both parties, whenever the principles of juftice were outraged; and whenever the caufe of liberty was disgraced, as in too many inftances it was, by the populace of France and their demagogues. One effect we are led to hope for confidently from the reprefentation we have drawn of thefe affairs, which is, that it will ferve to abate the violence of both parties on the subject-Such is ever the effect of truth.-The favourers of the French revolution will learn from our statement, that though the principle is impregnable, the conduct of the actors in this great event was not always immaculate; and thofe who are, in the general, hoftile to it, may perhaps be induced to allow that fuch an amazing change in a defpotic government, the abuses of which fo many were interested in preferving, could not be conducted without fome acts of violence and outrageWhere the people are to do every thing, they will do fome things wrong.
Another principle which a fair view of this fubject will establish, and which may alfo ferve to diminish the animofity of parties in this country, at least, is, that no grounds of comparifon exift between