« ForrigeFortsæt »
Mr. Hill's faint attempt to show, that his Scheme
differs from speculative Antinomianism: His incon-
At Mr. Hill's special request, Mr. Fulsome, (a gross
Antinomian, first introduced to the world by Mr.
the judicious, by producing a List of the gross
Mr. Hill, after passing over the Arguments and Scrip-
tures of the Fourth Check, attacks an Illustration
His Moral Creed about Faith and Works, is incompa-
tible with his Immoral System.
He raises a cloud of dust about a fair, though abridged,
quotation from Dr. Owen; and in his eagerness to
Some Queries concerning Mr. Hill's forwardness to
accuse his Opponents of disingenuity, gross perver-
field of Controversy.
A perpetual noise about gross perversions, and base
The Author, after professing his brotherly love and
respect for all pious Calvinists, apologizes for his An-
In the Appendix, the Author proves by ten more Ar..
guments, the absurdity of supposing, with the Solif.
RICHARD HILL, ESQ.
HON, AND DEAR SIR,
I HAVE received your Finishing Stroke, and return the following Auswer; to you, or, if you have quitted the field, to your pious second, the Rev. Mr. Berridge, who, by a public attack upon sincere obedience, and upon the doctrine of a believer's Justification by Works, and not by Faith only, has already entered the lists in your place.
Sect. 1. page 6. You complain, that I represent you as fighting the battles of the rankest Antinomians, “ Because (say you) we firmly believe and unanimously assert, that the blood of Christ cleanseth from all sin,' and that, if any man sin, we have an Advocate with the Father,' &c., and that this advocacy prevails." Not so, dear Sir ; I apprehend you give your readers totally wroug ideas of the question. You know, I