Chaim PerelmanSIU Press, 7. nov. 2002 - 180 sider This accessible book examines the philosophical foundations of Chaim Perelman's rhetorical theory. In addition to offering a brief biography, it explores Perelman's deep philosophical commitments and his concern for the ways in which the details of actual texts realize those commitments. The authors show that Perelman still reigns supreme when it comes to the elucidation of actual texts. His is a micro-analysis of arguments, one that is endlessly suggestive of ways of analyzing texts at the level of the word and phrase, the arrangement of parts, and the structure of arguments. |
Fra bogen
Resultater 1-5 af 19
Side 1
... Brussels, an institution where he would remain, except for vis~ iting professorships abroad, for the rest ofhis life. Among the professors who influenced Perelman at Brussels was Eugene Dupre'el, the prominent sociol~ ogist whose Traite ...
... Brussels, an institution where he would remain, except for vis~ iting professorships abroad, for the rest ofhis life. Among the professors who influenced Perelman at Brussels was Eugene Dupre'el, the prominent sociol~ ogist whose Traite ...
Side 2
... Brussels. On November I4 of that year he successfully de~ fended his doctoral dissertation on GottIob Erege, a nineteenth~century German mathematician who had conducted a systematic study of the pat terns of reasoning used by ...
... Brussels. On November I4 of that year he successfully de~ fended his doctoral dissertation on GottIob Erege, a nineteenth~century German mathematician who had conducted a systematic study of the pat terns of reasoning used by ...
Side 3
... Brussels came under the subjection of the anti~Semitic Nuremberg laws. They were asked by the rec tor of the university to resign, but refused as a matter of conscience. They f1~ nally agreed not to teach but did not sever their ...
... Brussels came under the subjection of the anti~Semitic Nuremberg laws. They were asked by the rec tor of the university to resign, but refused as a matter of conscience. They f1~ nally agreed not to teach but did not sever their ...
Side 4
... Brussels (Mat~ tis). Before we consider his remarkable burst of intellectual activity in the postwar years, however, it is fitting to acknowledge his many contributions to the educational and cultural affairs of Israel. In July, 1946 ...
... Brussels (Mat~ tis). Before we consider his remarkable burst of intellectual activity in the postwar years, however, it is fitting to acknowledge his many contributions to the educational and cultural affairs of Israel. In July, 1946 ...
Side 5
... Brussels was liberated on September 3, 1944, Perelman had already resumed his philosophical investigations. He had undertaken an ex haustive analysis of the idea ofjustice, a “confused notion,” as he would later call it. For centuries ...
... Brussels was liberated on September 3, 1944, Perelman had already resumed his philosophical investigations. He had undertaken an ex haustive analysis of the idea ofjustice, a “confused notion,” as he would later call it. For centuries ...
Indhold
1 | |
Philosophical Foundations | 13 |
A Theory of the Rhetorical Audience | 31 |
Arguing QuasiLogically | 43 |
Arguing from the Structure of Reality | 53 |
Arguments That Establish the Structureof Reality | 65 |
Rhetoric as a Technique and a Modeof Truth | 81 |
Arrangement as Persuasion | 99 |
The Figures as Argument | 115 |
Presence as Synergy | 135 |
Notes | 153 |
Bibliography | 157 |
Index | 165 |
Books in the Rhetoric in the Modern Era Series | 167 |
Back Cover | 168 |
Andre udgaver - Se alle
Almindelige termer og sætninger
act~person analogy analysis argu Aristotle arrangement assertion asyndeton attitudinal audience’s Belgians believe Brussels Chaim Perelman chapter claim co~author concept conclusion Constitution create DARROW Descartes Descartes’s devices dialectic Diana discourse dissociation Douglas’s effect elements ence enthymeme epistrophe example existence exordium fact figure final first formal human hyperbole idea incompatibility issue justice Kenneth Burke Lincoln Lincoln—Douglas litotes logic mathematical means ment metaphor metonymy mode of truth moral nature ofhis Perel Perelman and Olbrechts Perelman and Olbrechts~Tyteca person persuasive Phaedrus philosophical phoros Plato ploce political polyptoton polysyndeton presence presumption principle public address quasi~logical arguments question rational reason Republicans rhetorical audience rhetorical reason role rule ofjustice scientific self~evidence self~referential semantic sense slave slavery social South speaker species speech structure of reality synecdoche techniques territory theme and phoros theory of knowledge things tion tropes Tyteca Union universal audience values voted wrong