« ForrigeFortsæt »
Neighborhood without mutual aid is likely to beget bickering,
XXI cliquism and feuds. Farmers often lose their social traits when there is nothing they do together with their hands or their minds. tice of MaThey may be individually prosperous, yet fail to provide them- tual Ald selves with good roads, good schools, and opportunities for Socializo
Character stimulating social intercourse. Upright they may be, yet divided by social, racial, and religious schisms. The remedy is to get them to cooperate in the importation of lecturers, entertainers, and travelling libraries, in the improvement of the roads, in the betterment of the schools, in building and furnishing an assembly hall for common use, in mutual fire insurance, in cooperative purchasing, in collectively discussing and thinking out problems which touch the farmers' life, in joint action on behalf of desired legislation and in creating occasions for sociable enjoyment. The varied practice of mutual aid socializes character and engenders social morality. A common task may be performed by voluntary cooperation Growing
Resort or by compulsory cooperation. In the Middle Ages even military Compul.
sory Codcíence was sometimes provided for by common understanding. In the valley of the Wei River in China one sees river dikes, roads, irrigation mains and town walls which owe nothing to authority. There is a tendency, however, for functions which might be discharged by means of voluntary association to devolve upon the state. The citizens maintain a paid police instead of taking turns at " watch and ward.” Paid men fight fire instead of volunteer companies. The streets are cared for by a brigade of sweepers instead of a "clean-up" bee. The main motives for abandoning free cooperation are:
Turning 1. Selfish individuals refuse to do their part in creating con- Away from
Voluntary ditions like order, security, or salubrity, which benefit all alike. Coopera
tion on AC2. Certain services of joint benefit such as sanitation, educa- count of
Its Prac19 • The allodial proprietors of Languedoc devised another method of
iculties diense which gave them the same security and at the same time perFitted them to escape the ruinous protection of a feudal lord. The rehod was, in brief, for several neighboring proprietors to join together and form a sort of league or confederation, in which all guaranteed reciprocal assistance to each. As long as the alliance held, each member was bound, in the interests of the common defense, to occupy those positons in the domains of his allies which were most menaced. The oblirations of each member varied according to the importance of his proptity and according to the needs of adequate defense.” Munro and Sellery, * Medieval Civilization," 210-11.
tion, conservation, street cleaning, food-inspection, provision for recreation, etc., are appreciated least by the ignorant who need them most.
3. The waste of energy in keeping up as many voluntary associations as there are tasks calling for combined effort is avoided by using a single inclusive compulsory organization, e.g., the municipality. The necessity of creating under the voluntary plan as many distinct associations as there are general interests arises out of the fact that the library users are not identical with the school users, the playground users, the water users; with those who want steam rollers, or hose carts, or street sprinklers, or garbage carts, or irrigation ditches, or free antitoxin. Since the circles do not coincide, a special association would have to be organized for each service.
4. What once was done by the intermittent efforts of all fire fighting, pursuit of criminals with “hue and cry," watching dikes and irrigation canals, road mending, street cleaning, lifesaving — has been turned over to the continuous efforts of a few who know their business — firemen, police, street-cleaners, inspectors, and coastguards. Now that money is given instead of service, it is simpler to support these services out of taxes than to pass a subscription paper for each.
5. “Voluntary” cooperation loses voluntariness to the extent tary” Co operation that social pressure is applied in order to whip slackers into line. Less Will. On the other hand, under popular government, the support of ing than Coopera
each public service may be willing for all but a very small mition Under nority of tax payers. If four-fifths of the citizens approve a Govern
school tax, while half of those who contribute to a cause do so in order to placate public opinion, the former cooperation is
voluntary rather than the latter. The Com- In a word, the voluntary method of caring for common needs munity Outgrows is little used after the community has become too large for its tary Co. members to know one another and to act readily in concert; after operation
it has become so differentiated that the sense of common needs to be cared for is dull; and after the community can be better served by the trained man than by the volunteer citizen.
THE SOCIAL DIVISION OF LABOR
When the services to be combined or interchanged are unlike, we have a social division of labor. Part of society renders certain services while the rest render it counter-services.
XXI rangement may grow up spontaneously -- as we see in the trades and professions or of set purpose
as we see in the various public services. In the former case the services are paid for by the individual recipients of service, in the latter case by the group collectively. The earliest partition of social service is that between the The Prim
itive workers and the fighters. Barton shows that “a semi-agricul- vision of
Function tural cultivation of the palm in the oases was the chief food sup- is Between ply of the Arabs almost from the time of their settlement in the
and Fightpeninsula. No company of men could gain possession of an ers oasis and hold it for cultivation without organization for defense. Such an oasis would not support them the year round, they must either hunt or keep flocks and herds. In Arabia there was little hunting. If Alocks and herds were kept they must be led forth to pasture.
While some were cultivating the oasis, the younger and hardier men took the more dangerous part of leading the flocks and herds out to graze.” 11
Payne declares the primitive functional cleavage is between This Cleav. workers and warriors. “An agricultural tribe permanently set- Not Anu
pear Until tled upon productive lands which its labor has rendered addition- the Ag.:
cultural a'ly valuable, stands in a new relation to neighboring tribes. Stage While its permanently stationary condition exposes it to attacks, which its women, food stores and miscellaneous possessions naturally invite, the social changes produced by increasing reliance on agriculture render its members as a whole incapable of offerir.g effectual resistance. Hence the warrior class. Such a class, having as its primary function the defense of the community against external aggression, is found in all advancing agricultural tribes. Where an aggregate of such tribes, as happens in favoral circumstances, has been welded into a nation and has consequently come to make a figure in history, this class has always been the principal agent in the process. An advancement not defended by an adequate military organization would be foredoomed to extinction." 12
This exchange of service for protection he calls " the first social covenant," and adds,13 “ The social covenant can be shown in some instances to be definitely formulated and handed down
11 * A Sketch of Semitic Origins," pp. 33-4. :: Op. cit., Vol. II, pp. 1, 2.
13 Ibid., Vol. II, pp. 36-7.
in precise terms from generation to generation. Such was the XXI
case in the Pueblo of Mexico. Alarmed by the prospect of The Giving of Protec® fresh hostilities consequent upon the election of the new supreme tion In Ro- chief Itzcohuatl, the peasantry of Mexico, it was said, were Support is with difficulty prevented from migrating in a body to Azcaput" the First
zalco, and placing themselves permanently under the protection of Coven
the Tepanec chiefs. It was obvious that either the Mexican warriors must decisively defeat the Tepanecs, or the pueblo of Mexico must break up. The chiefs resolved on a desperate effort, and promised the people victory. “Conquer the Tepanecs,' replied the latter, and we will serve you, bring you tribute, till your lands and build your houses, we will give our daughters, our sisters, our nieces for your use, when you go to battle we will carry on our shoulders your arms, baggage and provisions and serve you thus, on all your war paths, we will give our bodies and our goods to your service for ever. The Mexican warriors routed the Tepanecs and on the following day the assembled peasantry ratified their compact which subsisted unaltered at the
arrival of the Spaniards. Origin of
Taine traces the old French noblesse to hard-hitting fighters pendence who in the anarchy of the tenth century gather a force which
can protect a district. Each canton acquires a local police corps in which from father to son one is always a policeman. The peasant now sows in security. He knows that in case of danger he can find asylum in the palisade at the base of the castle. By degrees a tacit contract grows up between the chieftain of the donjon and the early settlers in the open country. They will and
pay. him if he will protect them. As for the wretched who take refuge with him from the general disorder he plants them on soil which without him would be uninhabitable and they
become his serfs.13 Hired
Of course such a relation degenerates inevitably into exploitation because the cultivators cannot deal as equals with the fight
Able to intimidate the population they protect these local ploiters of
chieftains become headstrong lords, absorbing the best of everying Popu- .
thing and scorning every business but fighting. Many a local population which in the Dark Ages agreed to feed a wandering band of armed men in return for their military protection were crushed into serfdom by these hired guards. When the “ king's
13 “ The Ancient Régime," ch. I.
peace " spread over the land and defence was cared for by a royal army the scions of feudal chieftains became an elegant parasitic noblesse. The ancient societies had no armies distinct from the civil Rise of the
Standing population. The free man was at once citizen and soldier. The Army Roman Empire created a professional army of four hundred thousand soldiers, by means of which one hundred and twenty millions of souls lived in a peace and security such as the earlier societies have never known. But the people lost their liberties for good and all, while the martial spirit so decayed among the civil population that, once their troops had been beaten, they put up but a feeble resistance to the barbarians. The union of weapons and prestige in the same hands makes it Standing
Army very difficult to keep the military always subordinate to the civil Versus authority, i.e., to keep the armed servant from becoming master. In Europe the army has been the private preserve of the aristocracy and therefore a hotbed of reactionary intrigue. Dreading army ascendency our forefathers decried a standing army and put undue faith in a militia. The modern device of universal military service rather than an overlarge professional army avoids the peril of a gulf between the military and the civil parts of society. Another frequent differentiation is that between the governing Origin of
the class and the rest of society. This class arises out of those who, erning possessing wealth and leisure, have gained the intelligence and organization for the control of public affairs. Usually, but not always, it cultivates in its members martial spirit and proficiency
Such an element gains the upper hand because it has the qualifications for governing, whereas the unlettered masses are too ignorant and narrow-minded to rule the state. In EngLand of the eighteenth century, the country gentlemen; in our South, the planters; the Junkers in East Prussia; the hacendados in Chile, exemplify a governing class. The two former have had to let in traders and capitalists. The last is still a governing class because in Chile trade is in the hands of foreigners, who have no share in politics.
Such a class may give vigorous and intelligent government but How it it never uses government to promote social ends or to elevate Governthe masses. In time it is almost sure to come into serious ecoon.ic dependence upon the government it controls. Witness