Reflections upon the Answer to the "Papist Misrepresented," &c. directed to the Answerer. 4to. n. d. [N. 8. 2.] Another Copy. [M. 14. 25.] A Papist not misrepresented by Protestants, being a Reply to the Reflections upon the Answer to the "Papist Misrepresented," &c. [By Dr. SHERLOCK] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 25.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] Remarks upon the Reflections of the Author of " Popery Misrepresented," &c. on his Answerer, particularly as to the Deposing Doctrine. [By Abednego SELLER.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 2.] Papists Protesting against Protestant Popery, being a Vindication of the "Papist Mis-represented and Represented," and the Reflections upon the Answer. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] An Answer to a Discourse intituled "Papists protesting against Protestant Popery;" being a Vindication of "Papists not misrepresented by Protestants;" and containing a particular Examination of Monsieur de Meaux his Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of Rome in the Articles of Invocation of Saints and the Worship of Images, occasioned by that Discourse. [By William SHERLOCK.] 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] An Amicable Accommodation of the Difference between the Representer and the Answerer, in return to his last Reply against the Papist protesting against Protestant Popery. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] An Answer to the Amicable Accommodation. [By Dr. SHERLOCK.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] A Reply to the Answer of the Amicable Accommodation. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] A View of the whole Controversy between the Representer and the Answerer; with an Answer to the Representer's last Reply. [By Dr. Wm. CLAGETT.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 25.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 1.] An Answer to the Representer's Reflections upon the State and View of the Controversy: with a Reply to the Vindicator's full Answer. [By William CLAGETT.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 17.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 2.] A Catechism truly representing the Doctrines and Practices of the Church of Rome, with an Answer thereunto. [By John WILLIAMS.] 8vo. London, 1686. [N. 9. 43.] The Catholic Representer: or the Papist Misrepresented and Represented. Purt II. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] The Papist Represented and not Misrepresented; being an Answer to the first sheet of the Second Part of the " Papist Misrepresented and Represented." [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 9.] The Papist Represented, and not Misrepresented in Answer to the Second Sheet of the Second Part of the "Papist Misrepresented and Represented." [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 9.] Transubstantiation no Doctrine of the Primitive Fathers; being a Defence of the Dublin Letter herein against the "Papist Misrepresented and Represented, Part II." Cap. 3. [By John PATRICK.] London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] 4to. [By James Wholesome Advices from the Virgin Mary to her indiscreet Worshippers. Translated from the French, with a Preface. TAYLOR.] 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 9.] A Letter to the Misrepresenter of Papists; in Answer to the Fourth Chapter of the Second Part of the Papist Misrepresented, &c. [By James TAYLOR.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 9.] The Papist Represented and not Misrepresented, being an Answer to the Fifth and Sixth Chapters of the Second Part of the Papist Misrepresented and Represented. [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] The People's Right to read the Holy Scripture asserted. In Answer to the 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th Chapters of the Second Part of the Popish Representer. [By Dr. Nicholas STRATFORD.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 3.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 6.] (7.) DISCOURSES OCCASIONED BY THE EXPOUNDING CONTROVERSY DURING THE REIGN OF KING JAMES II. BOSSUET (James Benigne, Bishop of Meaux) An Exposition of the Doctrine of the Catholic Church in Matters of Controversie. 8vo. London, 1686. [K. 15. 37.] [M. 14. 19.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. Bossuet (Jacobi Benigni, Episcopi Condomensis) Doctrina Catholica, de iis An Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England in the several Articles proposed by Monsieur de Meaux, in his Exposition of the Doctrine of the Catholic Church; to which is prefixed, a particular Account of Monsieur de Meaux's Book. [By Wm. WAKE.] 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 25.] A Vindication of the Bishop of Condom's Exposition of the Doctrine of the Catholic Church, in Answer to "An Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England," &c. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 25.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] A Pastoral Letter from the Lord Bishop of Meaux to the New Catholics of his Diocess, exhorting them to keep their Easter, and giving them necessary advertisements against the false Pastoral Letters of their Ministers. With Reflections upon the pretended Persecution. Translated out of French. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 25.] The Answer of the New Converts of France to a Pastoral Letter from u Protestant Minister. Done out of French. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 21.] An Answer to the Bishop of Condom's " Exposition of the Catholic Faith," &c. Wherein the Doctrine of the Church of Rome is detected, and that of the Church of England expressed, &c. With Reflections on his Pastoral Letter. [By John GILBERT.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 19.] A Defence of the Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England against the Exceptions of Monsieur de Meaux and his Vindicator. [By William WAKE.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 19.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] A Reply to the Defence of the Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England: being a further Vindication of the Bishop of Condom's Exposition of the Doctrine of the Catholic Church. With a Second Letter from the Bishop of Meaux. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 31.] A Second Defence of the Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England against the new Exceptions of Monsieur de Meaux, late Bishop of Condom, and his Vindicator. In Two Parts. [By William WAKE.] 4to. London, 1687-88. [M. 14. 31.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687-88. [N. 8. 2.] An Account of the Fundamental Principle of Popery, as it is a distinct Communion, with a new Preface, particularly relating to the Bp. of Meaux and other modern Complainers of Misrepresentation. [By Henry DODWELL.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 10.] vi. Treatises on Particular Points of Controversy between Protestants and Papists. (1.) DISCOURSES ON THE PRETENDED UNITY, AUTHORITY, AND INFALLIBILITY OF THE CHURCH. POLI (Reginaldi, Cardinalis) ad Henricum octavum Britanniæ Regem, pro Ecclesiastica Unitatis defensione, Libri quatuor. 4to. Romæ, [1536.] [K. 20. 36.] CATALOGUS Testium Veritatis, qui, ante nostram ætatem, Pontificum Romanorum Primatui, variisque Papismi superstitionibus, erroribus, ac impiis fraudibus reclamarunt. Accessit Appendix Rerum et Testimoniorum insignium ab anno 1517 ad annum 1600. folio, Geneva, 1608. [L. 13. 1.] CRASHAW (William) Romish Forgeries and Falsifications: Together with Catholike Restitutions. Obserued, collected, and now discouered for the vse and honour of the Catholike Church, and to the just rebuke of the Romish Sinagogue. Latin and English. 4to. London, 1606. [K. 15. 12.] JAMES (Thomas) A Treatise of the Corruptions of Scripture, Councils, and Fathers, by the Prelates, Pastors, and Pillars of the Church of Rome, for the Maintenance of Popery and Irreligion. 4to. London, 1612. [N. 9. 51.] MASONI (Francisci) Vindiciae Ecclesiæ Anglicana; sive de legitimo ejusdem Ministerio, id est, de Episcoporum successione, consecratione, electione et confirmatione; item de Presbyterorum et Diaconorum ordinatione Libri V. In quibus Anglicana Ecclesia a Bellarmini, Sanderi, aliorumque Romanistarum calumniis et contumeliis vindicatur. folio, Londini, 1625. [M. 20. 14.] CHALONER (Edward) The Avthoritie, Vniversalitie, and Visibilitie of the Chvrch, handled and discussed. 4to. London, 1625. [M. 20. 19.] FEATLEY (Daniel) Rome's Ruin, being a succinct Answer to a Popish Challenge concerning the Antiquity, Universality, Succession, and Perpetual Visibility of the true Church, even in the most obscure Times when it seemed to be totally eclipsed in the immediate Ages before Luther. 4to. London, 1644. [N. 8. 37.] ELLIS (John) Vindicia Catholicæ; or the Rights of particular Churches rescued and asserted against that meer but dangerous notion of one Catholick, Visible, Governing Church, the foundation of the now endeavoured Presbyterie. 4to. London, 1647. [M. 20. 18.] FAITH vindicated from Possibility of Falsehood; or the Immoveable Firmness and Certainty of the Motives to Christian Faith asserted against that Tenet, which denying Infallibility of Authority, subverts its Foundation, and renders it uncertain. 8vo. London, 1667. [M. 19. 52.] JUDICIUM DISCRETIONIS: or a just and necessary Apology for the People's judgement of Private Discretion, exhibited against the arrogant pretences of Tannerus, Bellarmine, and other Advocates of the Papal Tyranny. Svo. London, 1667. [M. 19. 52.] ASHWELLI (Georgii) De Ecclesia Romana Dissertatio. 4to. Oxoniæ, 1688. [M. 14. 1.] A Rational Account of the Doctrine of the Roman Catholics concerning the Ecclesiastical Guides in Controversies of Religion. [By Abraham WoodHEAD. 4to. London, 1673. [B. 4. 35.] The Church of Rome no safe Guide. 4to. London, 1679. [P. 39. (13.)] A DISCOURSE Concerning a Judge of Controversies in Matters of Religion, being an Answer to some Papers asserting the Necessity of such a Judge. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 15. 13.] A Discourse concerning a Guide in Matters of Faith; with respect to the Romish Pretence of such an one as is infallible. [By Thomas TENISON, D. D.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 27.] The Pillar and Ground of Truth: a Treatise, shewing that the Roman Church falsely claims to be that Church and the Pillar of that Church, mentioned 1 Tim. iii. 15. [By Simon PATRICK, D. D.] 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 6.] A Discourse concerning the Nature, Unity, and Communion of the Catholic Church; wherein most of the Controversies relating to the Church are briefly and plainly stated. Part I. [By William SHERLOCK, D. D.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 9.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 2.] Dr. Sherlock sifted from his Bran and Chaff: or, A certain Way of finding the true Sense of the Scriptures, and discovering who are the true living Members of the Church of Christ. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 3.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 9.] A DISCOURSE concerning the Churches Authority in Matters of Faith, shewing that the Pretences of the Church of Rome are weak and precarious in the Resolution of it. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 21.] A Plain and Familiar Discourse, by way of Dialogue, betwixt a Minister and his Parishioner, concerning the Catholic Church. By a Divine of the Church of England. [Dr. Samuel FREEMAN.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 25.] A few Plain Reasons why a Protestant of the Church of England should not turn Roman Catholick. [By Thomas BARLOW, Bp. of Lincoln.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 5.] A Conference with Mr. Claude, Minister of Charenton, concerning the Authority of the Church. By James Benigne BOSSUET, Bishop of Meaux. Translated from the French. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 19.] Mr. Claude's Answer to Mons. De Meaux's Book, intitled "A Conference with Mr. Claude:" with his Letters to a Friend, wherein he answers a Discourse of M. de Meaux concerning the Church. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 16. 30.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 5.] An Historical Examination of the Authority of General Councils; shewing the false Dealing that hath been used in the publishing of them; and the Difference among the Papists themselves about their Number. [By Robert JENKIN.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 16.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 6.] Pope Pius his Profession of Faith, vindicated from Novelty in its additional Articles. Published with Allowance. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 5.] The Creed of Pope Pius IV. or, a Prospect of Popery, taken from that Authentic Record. With short Notes. [By Michael ALTHAM.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 5.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 20. 1.] The Additional Articles in Pope Pius's Creed no Articles of the Christian Faith; being an Answer to a Pamphlet, intituled "Pope Pius his Profession of Faith vindicated from Novelty in its additional Articles," and "The Prospect of Popery, taken from that authentic Record, with short Notes thereupon," defended. [By Michael ALTHAM.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 5.] A View of Popery, taken from the Creed of Pope Pius the Fourth. By Joseph BURROUGHS. 8vo. London, 1735. [P. 85. (2.)] Doubts concerning the Roman Infallibility. 1. Whether the Church of Rome believe it? 2. Whether Jesus Christ or his Apostles ever recommend it? 3. Whether the Primitive Church knew or used that way of deciding Controversie? [By Henry MAURICE, D. D.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 14. 28.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 6.] A Discourse, shewing that Protestants are on the safer side, notwithstanding the uncharitable Judgment of their Adversaries; and their Religion is the surest way to Heaven. [By Mr. BOLIEU.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 5.] The Protestant Resolved: or, a Discourse shewing the Unreasonableness of his turning Roman Catholic for Salvation. [By Clement ELLYS.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 9.] |