Billeder på siden
PDF
ePub

that by converfing with the In- |
dian he hired, and compiling
fome difcourfes by his affiftance,
he quickly became mafter of this
difficult language: And after
fome time, by the help of the fame
Indian, and by his own indefati-
gable pains and industry, he be-
came fo complete a' mafter of it,
as to be capable of reducing it to
a method, which afterwards he
publifhed to the world under the
title of the Indian grammar.
Having finished his grammar, at
the close he writes thus; "Pray.
ers and pains, thro' faith in Chrift
Jefus, will do any thing.*

"In the year 1646, the general court of Maffachusetts paffed the first act, or order to encourage the carrying the gospel to the Indians; and it was recommended to the elders to confider how it might best be done." I have never met with any account of their convention (as doubtlefs they formed one) nor of the anfwer they gave to the queftion propofed by the affembly. Doubtlefs many valuable fentiments were communicated by fo judicious an affembly as that compofed of the firft minifters who came over, many of whom were gentlemen of distinguished abilities, and of as good an education as could be obtained, at that day, in the univerfities in England.

There was a concurrence of many things to encourage Mr. Eliot in the benevolent defign he had formed to gofpelize the Indians; and to profecute the work with vigor when he had undertaken it. All the good men in the country were glad of his engaging in fuch an undertaking: The ministers especially encour

* Dr. C. Mather-Mr. Neale.

+ Hutchinson's Hift. v. i. p. 161,

aged him; and when he had entered upon his Miffionary la bors, thofe in the neighborhood kindly supplied his place, and per. formed, in part, his work for him at Roxbury, while he was abroad, laboring among the heathen, or those that had embraced Chriftianity, but needed further inftructions from him: And it was an happy circumftance, that fo many churches in that neighborhood had each a pastor and teacher, so that more could be done in fupplying Mr. Eliot's place than otherwife.

He was further awakened by thofe expreffions in the royal charter, which have been already mentioned.

And the remarkable zeal of the Romish Miffionaries, compaffing fea, and land, that they might make profelytes, made his devout mind think of it with difdain, that we fhould be lefs zealous and diligent in evangelizing the Indians, among whom we dwell.

He was further encouraged by the notice, which was taken of this good work in England, foon after it was begun-by the contributions raised, and the fociety formed to afford pecuniary aid; a more particular account of which will be given in its place.

Nor was he a little animated to purfue his laborious fervices, by the divine promise made to the Meffiah" I fhall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermoft parts of the earth for thy poffeffion."*

Having prepared himself for going forth as a public inftructor of the Indians, he made his firft effay on the 28th of O&. 1646, accompanied by three others, having given previous notice to the

Magnalia, B. iii.

neighboring Indians of his defire | Indians, and defired them to pro

At this firft conference, the following queftions were pue this poor people. One ftood, and afked, "How he might come to know Jefus Chrift?" Another enquired," Whether Englishmen were ever fo ignorant of Jefus Chrift as themselves?" A third (probably in the fimplicity of his heart) "Whether Jefus Chrift

to inftruct them in the Chriftian pofe fuch queftions as they tho't faith. Wauban, a wife and grave proper refpecting the fermon, or man, and in other refpects, a any other point not contained in perfon of diftinction, with five or it; and it became the general, if fix of the Natives, met them at not conftant practice, after a fersome distance from their wigwams, mon, for as many of the Indians and bidding them welcome, con- as defired it, to ftand up, and producted them into a large apart- pofe queftions to the preacher. ment, where a great number of Some of their questions would be the Indians were collected to hear philofophical, fome upon abftrufe this new doctrine, which the Eng-points in divinity, &c. fo that no lifh proposed to teach them. Af- fmall acquaintance with theology, ter a folemn prayer, Mr. Eliot philofophy, and other sciences, delivered a difcourfe to them in was requifite to give just and fathe Indian tongue, which contin- tisfactory anfwers.* ued fomewhat more than an hour, comprehending many of the moft important articles of natural and revealed religion. In this difcourse he rehearsed and explained the ten commandments; informing therm, at the fame time, of the dreadful curfe of God, that would fall upon all thofe that break them. He then informed them of the coming of Jefus Chrift into the world, to recover * Gov. Hutchinfon quotes the folmankind from fin, and the pun-lowing questions from the journal of ifhment of it. He told them who Jefus Chrift was; where he was gone; and how he would come one day again to judge the world in flaming fire. He informed them likewife of the bleffed ftate of all thofe, who believe in Chrift, and obey his gofpel. He fpake alfo of the creation and fall of man-of the infinite greatness of God, the maker of all things of the joys of heaven, and the torments of hell; perfuading to repentance and holy practice. He applied all to the condition of the Indians prefent. Having finifhed his difcourfe, he afked them, Whether they understood? And with a general voice they faid, that they understood all.-Mr. Eliot and his companions entered into a free converfation with the VOL. III. No. 10.

Col. Goffe, one of the judges of King Charles the First. This gentleman attended an Indian Lecture in 1660, after

the natives had been under instruction following queftions put by them, viz. 13 or 14 years. He takes notice of the

1. In your text are these words, "Save yourselves, from this untoward

generation." In other fcriptures is ftands, We can do nothing of ourfeives ;

how can this be reconciled?

2. You fay, "The word is the sword of the fpirit, by which their hearts were pricked." How fhall I ufe the fword of the fpirit to prick my heart?

3. What was the fin of Judas, or ing it was what God had appointed? how did he fin in betraying Christ, see

4. The answer to thofe converts was, "Repent, and be baptized, &c.; but ye do not fuffer us to be baptized therefore, I fear none of the Indians fins are forgiven; and my heart is weary with that fear; for it is faid in Matthew, Whose fins ye bind on earth are bound in heaven." Ааа

could understand prayers in the Indian language?" Another propofed this question, "How there could be an image of God, fince it was forbidden in the second commandment?" Another, "Whether if the father be naught, and the child good, God will be offended with that child, because in the fecond commandment it is faid, "He vifits the iniquities of the fathers upon the children | The laft queftion that was asked at this meeting was, "How all the world became full of people, if they were all drowned in the flood?" Mr. Eliot and his friends gave plain and familiar answers.

Anfwer to a Question. [Continued from page 338.]

I'

NUMBER II.

N anfwering this question, it has been fhewn, in a preceding number, that the atonement of Chrift is infinitely full or fufficient for the salvation of all mankind; that therefore the want of fuch an atonement cannot be the reafon why all are not faved.

It is proposed then to shew,

II. That the calls and invitations of the gofpel, and the folemn declaration, that God hath no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that they would turn and live, are confiftent with his leaving numbers to go on in fin and perifh.

It was alfo Mr. Eliot's cuftom to put proper queftions to his Indian auditors: And by hearing their queries, and anfwering them, And in doing this it is neceffaand interrogating those under in-ry to confider the precife meaning ftruction in his turn, he not only of the declaration, that God hath made a trial of their profiting by no pleasure in the death of the his miniftry; but alfo gave an edge wicked, but that they turn and to what he delivered to them.* live. This paffage muft mean, either that God, taking all things into view, does not upon the whole choose the death or punifhment of any of the wicked, but actually chooses that they should all turn and live; or else it must mean, that he takes no direct pleafure in their death or misery, in itself confidered, but that their turning and obtaining life is in itself more pleafing and defirable. But it is evident from various confiderations, that the passage cannot be rationally understood in the fenfe firft ftated. For if the Moft High, all things confidered, did actually choose that none of the wicked fhould go on in fin and perifh, but that all should turn and live; then he must be greatly disappointed in his real choice and

This conference lafted about three hours; and after it was clofed, Mr. Eliot and his companions returned home; and were fo well pleased with the reception they met with among the natives, and the hopeful profpect of fuccefs, that they were encouraged to have another interview with the people, which they accomplished within a few days: account of this, together with fucceeding conferences, and feveral other interefting events refpecting Mr. Eliot's miffionary fervices, may be expected in the following number.

an

*Magnalia, B. iii. p. 193, and 196. Hutchinson's hiftory of Maffachusetts. Neale's hift. of N. England, vol. i. p.

242, 243; he made extracts from a book entitled Day-breaking of the Gofpel in New England; London 1647, fome of which have been quoted..

defire.

For the fcriptures exprefsly declare, that "wide is the gate and broad is the way which

leadeth to deftruction, and many there be that go in thereat ;" and it is allowed in the ftatement of the queftion, that a number do go on in fin and perish. And if Jehovah is thus difappointed in his actual choice and defigns, it must certainly occafion him great forrow and unhappiness. None therefore, who have any juft ideas of the divine perfections and felicity, can for a moment indulge the fuppofition that the infinitely wife, powerful and perfect God is thus fruftrated in his defires, and rendered unhappy by his crea

tures.

Further, if Jehovah, upon the whole, did actually choose that all the wicked fhould repent and be faved, he certainly would convert and fave them; fince he poffeffes almighty power, has all hearts in his hand, and can with the greatest ease turn and bring the most stubborn to repentance, if he pleases. As God does not in fact bring all finners to repentance, it is therefore certain, that upon the whole he does not really choose to do it.

Again, how derogatory would it be to the divine perfections, to fuppofe that the Moft High did upon the whole actually choose that all the wicked fhould be brought to repentance and falvation, and yet was not able to accomplish his choice?

Thefe various confiderations clearly fhew, that the import of this paffage muft be, that God has no direct pleasure in the death or mifery of the wicked, in itself confidered, but that their repentance and falvation in themselves, or afide from other infinitely wife reasons, in the divine government would be much more pleafing to him than their deftruction. And that this is the truth is manifeft

from the divine character, and from other declarations of fcripture. For "God is love," or benevolence; and therefore it is certain, that he cannot take any pleasure directly from the punishment or mifery of the wicked, and that he never punishes but when it is neceffary to answer wife and benevolent purposes, and promote the general good. But on the contrary, it is evident, that their repentance and falvation would be in themselves delightful, and afford direct pleasure to the holy, benevolent mind of Jehovah, if confiftent with the wifeft scheme of government. It is therefore declared, that God doth not afflict willingly, nor grieve the children of men," and that to punifh is his ftrange or unpleafant work. But it is faid, that there is joy in heaven over one finner that repenteth," teaching, that it is a pleafing, joyful event to God and the heavenly world. These confiderations confirm the sense of the paffage laft given; that God takes no pleasure in the mifery of the wicked, in itself confidered. Thus what the Moft High expreffes in this paffage to. wards finners, is very fimilar to what kind, benevolent parents ex. prefs towards their disobedient children. They often addrefs their children in expreffions fimilar to what God makes ufe of in this paffage; We take no pleafure in your punishment or pain, but it is much more pleafing to us to fee you reform and be obedient. Such language in a parent would imply, not that he would never choose to punish any of his children when they deferved it, and the good of the family required it, but that their punishment was not in itself agreeable to him, and that he took no direct pleasure in it. So the

[ocr errors]

declaration, that God hath no pleafure in the death of the wicked, but that they turn and live, imports, that the mifery or punifhment of the wicked is not in itfelf pleafing to him; but is by no means faying that he will fend his Holy Spirit to renew and bring all mankind to repentance and falvation. It is therefore very far from engaging or implying, implying, that he will never leave any to go on in fin and finally fufter that everlafting punishment which they have juftly deserved; when he fees it beft in order to difplay his justice and perfections, promote the good of his kingdom, and anfwer other wife and benevolent purposes. Neither are the calls and invitations of the gofpel at all inconfiftent with God's leaving numbers to go on in fin and perish. The divine offers and invitations, fuch as "Look unto me, and be ye faved, all the ends of the earth -Turn ye, turn ye; for why will ye die?-Whofoever will, let him take the water of life freely," are no promises that the holy Spirit fhall be fent to renew and make all who are favored with thefe calls and offers willing to comply with them. God, in giving mankind thefe gracious calls and invitations, no more promises to bring them to a cordial compliance, by the efficacious influences of his Holy Spirit, than the king who in the parable fent his fervants to call thofe that were bidden to the marriage fupper, did by this invitation promise to compel all to come in by force, who neglected the call. No one ever fuppofed, that his offering a peculiar favor to another upon a moft reasonable condition, was promifing that he would oblige the other, if unwilling, to accept or comply with the propofed con

dition. Certainly then the Moft High, by his kind calls and invitations to finners, has made them no promise that he will renew and influence them to a compliance.

Neither do these invitations lay God under any obligations to do this for the impenitent. Can any pretend to fay, that because God is fo kind and merciful as freely to offer pardon and falvation to unworthy, hell-deferving finners upon the most reasonable terms; therefore he is under obligation to difpofe them to a cordial compliance by the efficacious influences of his fpirit, upon their refufing thefe offers? Or in other words, does their ungratefully neglecting one favor, oblige God in point of juftice to do them another? Should a kind, generous benefac tor provide a plentiful entertainment, and invite a number of unworthy beggars, and should they ungratefully refuse his kind invitation, furely no one could fay, that he was under obligations to fend his fervants and compel them to come.

Since therefore the calls and invitations of the gospel are no promife, that God will fend his fpirit, and make finners willing to comply with thefe, and do not lay him under any obligation to do this; how are they at all inconfiftent with his leaving numbers to go on in fin and perish? Where is the leaft appearance of inconfiftency for God to call, warn, and invite finners to repent and be faved-to fet motives of infinite weight before them, and yet leave them to follow their own choice, by going on in the ways of fin to deftruction? Jehovah, in thus leaving the impenitent to perish in their fins, when he fees it beft for the general good, violates no promise, no obligation of juf

« ForrigeFortsæt »