Billeder på siden
PDF
ePub

lodging : “For I 'trust,” says he - thatı through your prayers I shall be given unto you.”baThis agrees with the expectation of speedy deliverance, which he expressed in another epistle written during the same imprisonment : '“Him” (Timothy);"I hope :tqi send presently, so soon as I shall see how it will go with me; but I trust in the Lord that I also myself shall come shortly." Phil. chap. ii. 23, 24. Oliven

4. As the letter to Philemon, and that to the Colossians, were written at the same time, and sent by the same messenger, the one to a particular inhabitant, the other to the church of Colosse, it may be expected that the same or nearly the same persons would be about St. Paul, and join with him, as, was the practice, in the salutations of the epistle. 3.) ACcordingly we find the names of Aristarchus, Marcus, Epaphras, Luke, and Demas, in both epistles. Timothy, who is joined with St. Paul in the superscription of the Epistle to the Colossians, is joined with him in this. Tychicus did not salute Philemon, because he accompanied the epistle to Colosse, and would undoubtedly there see him. Yet the reader of the Epistle to Philemon will remark one considerable diversity in the catalogue of saluting friends, and which shows that the catalogue was not copied from that to the Colossians. In the Epistle to the Colossians, Aristarchus is called by St. Paul his fellow-prisoner, Colos. chap. iv. 10; in the Epistle to Philemon, Aristarchus is mentioned without any addition, and the title of fellow-prisoner is given to Epaphras. *10

* Dr. Benson observes, and perhaps truly, that the appellation of fellow-prisoner, as applied by St. Paul to Epaphras, did not

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

fill up;

And let it also be observed, that notwithstanding the close and circumstantial agreement between the two epistles, this is not the case of an opening left in a genuine writing, which 'an impostor is induced to

; nor of a reference to some writing not extant, which sets a sophist at 'work to supply, the loss, in like manner as, because St. Paul was supposed (Colos. chap. iv. 16) to allude to an epistle written by him to the Laodiceans, some person has from thence taken the hint of uttering a forgery under that title. The present,

I
say,

is not that case; for Philemon's name is not mentioned in the Epistle to the Colossians Onesimus' servile condition is no where hinted at, any more than his crime, his flight, or the place or time of his conversion. The story therefore of the epistle, if it be a fiction, is a fiction to which the author could not have been guided, by any thing he had read in St. Paul's genuine writings. » 111 -J100 sivii

No. III. se-Ver. 4, 5.11". I thank my God, making mention of thee always in my prayers, hearing of thy love and faith, which thou hast toward the Lord Jesus, and toward all saints." 2:41 Hearing of thy love and faith." This is the form of speech which St. Paul was wont to use towarda visited: see Rom. chap. i. 8; Ephes, chap. i. 15;

! imply that they were imprisoned together at the time ; any more than your calling a person your fellow-traveller imports that you are then upon your travels. If he had, upon any former occasion, travelled with you, you might afterwards speak of him under that title. It is just so with the term fellow-prisoner.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Col. chap. i. 3, 4. Toward those churches and persons, with whom he was previously, acquainted, he employed a different phrase ; as, “I thank my God always on your behalf,” (1 Cor. chap, i, 4; Thess. chap. i. 3;) or, upon every remembrance of you," (Phil. chap. i. 3; 1 Thess. chap. i. 2, 3,; ; 2 Tim. chap. i. 3 ;) and never speaks of hearing of them. Yet, I think it must be concluded, from the nineteenth verse of this epistle, that Philemon had been converted by St. Paul himself: “Albeit, I do, not say to thee how thou owest unto me even thine own self besides.” Here then is a peculiarity. Let us inquire whether the epistle supplies any circumstance which will account for it. We have seen that it may be made out, not from the epistle itself, but from a comparison of the epistle with that to the Colossians, that Philemon was an inhabitant of Colosse : and it farther appears from the Epistle to the Colossians, that St. Paul had never been in that city ; “I would that ye knew what great conflict I have for you and for them at Laodicea, and for as many as have not seen my face in the flesh.” Col. ch. ii. 1. Although, therefore, St. Paul had formerly met with Philemon at some other place, and had been the immediate instrument of his conversion, yet Philemon's faith and conduct afterwards, inasmuch as he lived in a city which St. Paul had never visited, could only be known to him by fame and reputation.

[ocr errors]

No. IV. The tenderness and delicacy of this epistle have long been admired: "Though I might be muc bold in Christ to enjoin thee that which is convenient, yet for love's sake I rather beseech thee, being such an 'one'as Paul the aged, and now also a prisoner of Jesus Christ'; I beseech thee for my son Onesimus, whom I have' begotten in' my bonds.” There is something certainly very melting and persuasive in this and every part of the epistle. Yet, in my opinion, the character of St. Paul prevails in it throughout. The warm, affectionate, authoritative teacher is interceding with an absent friend for a beloved convert. He urges his suit with an earnestness, befitting perhaps not so much the occasion, as the 'ardour and sensibility of his own mind. Here also, as every where, he shows himself conscious of the weight and dignity of his mission; nor does he suffer Philemon for a moment to forget it: “I might be much bold in Christ to enjoin thee that which is convenient.” He is careful also to recall, though obliquely, to Philemon's memory, the sacred obligation under which he had laid him, by bringing to him the knowledge of Jesus Christ : “ I do not say to thee how thou owest to me even thine own self besides." Without laying aside, therefore, the apostolic character, our author softens the imperative style of his address, by mixing with it every sentiment and consideration that could move the heart of his correspondent. Aged and in prison, he is content to supplicate and entreat." Onesimus was rendered dear to him by his conversion and his services : the child of his affliction, and “ministering unto him in the bonds of the Gospel,” This ought to recommend him, whatever had been his fault, to Philemon's forgiveness : “ Receive him as myself, as my own bowels.” Every thing, however, should be voluntary. St. Pauliwas determined that Philemon's compliance should flow ifrom his own bounty :: “ Without thy mind would I do nothing, that thy benefit should not be as it were sof necessity, but willingly gif trusting nevertheless to his gratitude and attachment for the performance of all that he requested, and for more: ** Having confidence in thy obedience, I wrote unto thee, knowing that thou wilt also do omore than I say."

St. Paul's discourse at Miletus; his speech before Agrippa ; his Epistle to the Romans, as hath been remarked (No. VIII.); that to the Galatians, chap. iv. 11–20; to the Philippians, chap. II. 29-chap. ii. 2; the Second to the Corinthians, chap. vi. 113; and indeed some part or other of almost every epistle, exhibit examples of a similar application to the feelings and affections of the persons whom he addresses. And it is observable, that these pathetic effusions, drawn for the most part from his own sufferings and situation, usually precede a command, soften a rebuke, or mitigate the harshness of some disagreeable truth.

of 'ze: ] D111
}},29 9112119 91

001. con alles it 09!
PLIIVX tot ell euroi
CHAPTER XV. 61

T )
THE SUBSCRIPTIONS OF THE EPISTLES.

1 O JIB D911 Sıx of these subscriptions are false or improbable; that is, they are either absolutely contradicted by the contents of the epistle, or are difficult to be reconciled with them.

[ocr errors]

: 1 ( :

[ocr errors]
« ForrigeFortsæt »