The Limits of Moralizing: Pathos and Subjectivity in Spenser and MiltonBucknell University Press, 1994 - 271 sider "This book argues that critical tradition has obscured the mutually constitutive relation between the didactic mission of Renaissance epic and the pathos of the epic self." "Critics usually see Spenser and Milton either as poets dedicated to an autonomous aesthetic that dictates indulgence in pathos for its own sake, or as Christian moralists who subordinate pathos to the didactic demands of society. The Romantic tradition that stretches from Keats to Harold Bloom exemplifies the former option. Neo-Christian, reader response, and new historicist critics assert a contrary, but similarly unbalanced, view by choosing the didactic authority of social custom, tradition, or ideology over the pathos of subjectivity." "Resisting attempts to establish an absolute priority for either pathos or moralizing, David Mikics looks to the debate between subjective passions and didactic imperatives as a sign of the complex relation between literary creation and social norms. In a study that shies away from new historicist endorsements of the force of normative ideology, as well as late Romantic celebrations of the poetic self, the author finds that Spenser and Milton develop an innovative literary subjectivity under the pressure of the Reformation's moralizing aims." "Incorporating moral force within pathos would allow poetic passion to become a worthy and clearly justifiable public stance. But Spenser and Milton, in their pursuit of this rhetorical ideal, find themselves acknowledging, instead, an enduring disjunction between affect and the discursive forms of public morality which aim to discipline or exploit it."--BOOK JACKET.Title Summary field provided by Blackwell North America, Inc. All Rights Reserved |
Indhold
Pathos and Moralizing in Classical and Renaissance | 15 |
The Faerie Queene Book 1 | 43 |
The Faerie Queene Book 2 | 64 |
Copyright | |
16 andre sektioner vises ikke
Andre udgaver - Se alle
The Limits of Moralizing: Pathos and Subjectivity in Spenser and Milton David Mikics Begrænset visning - 1994 |
Almindelige termer og sætninger
Achilles Acrasia Adam Adam's Aeneas Aeneid aesthetic allegorical Amoret amorous Archimago argue Arthegall Arthur assert Bower Britomart Calidore Calidore's Cambridge Canto character Christian claims contrast criticism Dalila danger decorum depiction desire Despair didactic didacticism divine doctrine dramatic Dryden Duessa effect emotion epic episode ethical example external Faerie Queene final books force Fradubio God's grace Greenblatt Guyon Hellenore hero heroic human Imaginary impulse individual interpretation John knight London Malecasta Maleger means Mezentius Michael Milton moral narrative Nohrnberg Oxford Paradise Lost Paradise Regained Paridell Paridell's passage passion pathos Philistine pity Plato plot poem poem's poet poet's poetic poetry Princeton University Press Protestant providential Pyrochles reader reading Red Crosse Red Crosse's remains Renaissance Reprint response romance sacred Samson Agonistes Satan Scaliger scene Son's Spenser stanza Stoic Stoicism suggests Symbolic Tasso temperance thou thumos tion tragedy tragic trans truth turns Una's Virgil virtue vulnerability weakness writes