War and International Justice: A Kantian Perspective

Forsideomslag
Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press, 6. jun. 2000 - 299 sider

Can war ever be just? By what right do we charge people with war crimes? Can war itself be a crime? What is a good peace treaty?

Since the Cold War ended in the early 1990s, many wars have erupted, inflaming such areas as the Persian Gulf, Central Africa and Central Europe. Brutalities committed during these conflicts have sparked new interest in the ethics of war and peace.

Brian Orend explores the ethics of war and peace from a Kantian perspective, emphasizing human rights protection, the rule of international law and a fully global concept of justice. Contending that Kant’s just war doctrine has not been given its due, Orend displays Kant’s theory to its fullest, impressive effect. He then completely and clearly updates Kant’s perspective for application to our time.

Along the way, he criticizes pacifism and realism, explores the nature of human rights protection during wartime, and defends a theory of just war. He also looks ahead to future developments in global institutional reform using cases from the Persian Gulf War, Somalia, Bosnia, and Rwanda to illustrate his argument.

Controversial and timely, perhaps the most important contribution War and International Justice: A Kantian Perspective makes is with regard to the question of justice after war. Orend offers a principled theory of war termination, making an urgent plea to reform current international law.

Fra bogen

Indhold

Introduction
1
KANTS JUST WAR THEORY
13
A CONTEMPORARY KANTIAN JUST WAR THEORY
87
Conclusion
267
Bibliography
275
Index
293
Copyright

Andre udgaver - Se alle

Almindelige termer og sætninger

Populære passager

Side 219 - Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security.
Side 109 - Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
Side 219 - Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defense shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present dinrter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
Side 35 - Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law...
Side 218 - An armistice suspends military operations by mutual agreement between the belligerent parties. If its duration is not defined, the belligerent parties may resume operations at any time...
Side 36 - Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end.
Side 218 - The envoy loses his rights of inviolability if it is proved in a clear and Incontestable manner that he has taken advantage of his privileged position to provoke or commit an act of treachery.
Side 106 - Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c. 11 provides that '[e]veryone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
Side 219 - An armistice must be notified officially and in good time to the competent authorities and to the troops. Hostilities are suspended immediately after the notification, or on the date fixed.
Side 218 - A person is regarded as bearing a flag of truce who has been authorized by one of the belligerents to enter into communication with the other, and who advances bearing a white flag. He has a right to inviolability, as well as the trumpeter, bugler or drummer, the flag-bearer and interpreter who may accompany him.

Om forfatteren (2000)

Brian Orend, a philosophy professor at the University of Waterloo, Canada, has also taught at Columbia University in New York City.

Bibliografiske oplysninger