« ForrigeFortsæt »
been doubted; and as respectable Divines have supposed this discourse to be an account of St. Paul's state before he was converted; I shall attempt to prove the truth of my assertion. This I shall do, very summarily, in the three following remarks.
ist. St. Paul observes, verse 22d, I delight in the law of God, after the inward man.
This assertion was never true of any man, antecedently to his regeneration. St. Paul does not say, that he approves of the law of God. This would have been a declaration concerning his reason, or his conscience. But he says, I delight in the Law of God. This is a declaration concerning his feelings ; his heart. The heart of an unregenerate man never yet delighted in the Divine Law.
2dly. In the 24th verse, he exclaims, Owretched man, that I am! Who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
From this exclamation it is certain, that the evil, from which St. Paul so passionately wished a deliverance, was existing at the time when the passage was written. But at the time when the
passage was written, St. Paul had been a convert many years. The evil existed, therefore, after his conversion.
3dly. In the 25th verse, he says, So then, with the mind I myself serve the law of God.
This assertion could never be truly made concerning any unregenerate man. The mind of every such man, we know from the mouth of the same Apostle, is enmity against God; not subject to his Law, neither indeed can be.
The account given by St. Paul of himself in this chapter, is, then, an account of his moral state, at the time when the chapter was written. As St. Paul in all probability was inferior to no other mere man, in moral excellence; he may be justly considered as having given us, here, a description of Christians in their very best state.
But, if in this state there is a law in their members, warring against the law of their minds, and bringing them into captivity to the law of sin, which is in their members; if when they would do good, evil is present with them; so that the good which they would they do not; and the evil which they would not they do; how plain is it, that, instead of meriting justification by their works, they daily violate the law of God, provoke his anger, expose themselves to condemnation, and stand in infinite need of the intercession of Christ, and the pardon of their sins, in order to their salvation !
Besides, the very best actions of regenerated men are imperfect; and fall short of the demands of the Law. This position is so rarely contested, that I need not here allege arguments, to evince its truth. But it cannot be pretended, that an obedience, which does not even answer the demands of the Law in any case, but is invariably defective, and therefore in some degree sinful, can be the ground of justification to any man.
I have now finished the observations, which I intended concerning this subject. If I mistake not, they furnish ample proof, that we
are justified freely by the grace of God, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus. A few remarks shall conclude the dis
REMARKS. 1st. From what has been said it is evident, that the salvation of mankind is a glorious exhibition of the character, and particularly of the Benevolence, of God.
On this subject I cannot dwell; and shall only observe summarily, that the work of our salvation was contrived, and accomplished, by God alone: that the means, by which it was accomplished, viz. the Mediation of Christ, and the mission and agency of the Holy Ghost, far from lessening, only enhance, our conceptions of the Divine Benevolence, displayed in this work : that the goodwill, manifested in doing any thing, is ever proportioned to the efforts, which are made : that, in the present case, the efforts, actually made, are the most wonderful, which have been disclosed to the Universe ; and that they, therefore, discover the good-will of the Creator to mankind, in a manner, and in a degree, wholly uncxampled.
All this, at the same time, was done for beings entirely unnecessary to God. In himself, therefore; in his own compassion; must have existed, the originating, powerful, and productive cause of this wonderful event. What must have been the good-will of Him, who sent his Son to seek, and to save, that which was lost; and to become obedient unto death, even the death of the cross, that sinners and rebels might live?
2dly. The Socinian objection against the doctrine of the Alonement, that it is opposed to the Scriptural account of the exercise of grace in our justification, is here seen to be groundless.
If the observations, made in this discourse, are true; the doctrine of the atonement, instead of lessening, or destroying, the exercise of grace in our justification, only renders this act of God more eminently gracious. If all these things, which have been mentioned, particularly the atonement of Christ, were necessary to be done, in order to the salvation of mankind, the mercy, which resolved on them all, is far more strongly displayed, than if nothing more had been necessary, than barely to forgive the sinner.
3dly. If God be thus merciful, all the declarations of his mercy ought to be believed by us.
The disposition, which could contrive, and execute, these things, of its own mere choice; without any reward; without any expectation of any reward; for beings equally undeserving, and unnecessary; can do all things, which are kind, and proper to be done. Especially can this disposition carry the things, which it has contrived, and begun, intocomplete execution. To do this is its own natural hent; the mere progress of its inherent propensities. The declarations therefore, which manifest the determination of him, in
whom this disposition resides, to accomplish all things pertaining to this work, ought cordially, as well as entirely, to be believed. To distrust them is equally absurd, and guilty: absurd, because they are supported by the most abundant evidence; guilty, because the distrust springs from the heart, and not from the understanding
Why should God be disbelieved, when he declares, that he has no pleasure in the death of the sinner? or when he proclaims, Whosoever will, let him come, and lake the water of life freely?. If he had wished to punish mankind, for the gratification of his own views, or pleasure, could he not have done it with infinite ease? To him it was certainly unnecessary to announce the forgiveness of sin ; to send his Son to die, or to give his Spirit, and his Word, to sanctify, and save. This immense preparation depended solely on his own mere pleasure. He might have suffered the law to take its course. He might have annihilated, or punished for ever, the whole race of Adam; and with a command have raised up a new and better world of beings in their stead. Men are in no sense necessary to God. He might have filled the Universe with Angels at once; perfect, obedient, excellent, and glorious beings; and been loved, praised, and obeyed, by them for ever. Why then, but because he was desirous to save poor, guilty, perishing men, did he enter upon the work of their salvation? Why did he give his Son, to redeem them? Why did he send his Spirit, to sanctify them? Why did he proclaim glad tidings of great joy unto all people? Why does he wait with infinite patience, why has he always waited, to be gracious; amid all the provocations, and sins, of this polluted world? Why are the calls of mercy, after being so long, and so extensively, rejected with scorn and insult, repeated through one age after another? Why, after all our unbelief, are they repeated to us? Why are we, after all our transgressions, assembled, this day, to hear them? The true, the only, answer is; God is infinitely kind, merciful, and willing to save to the uttermost.
Let, then, this glorious Being be believed without distrust: without delay. Let every sinner boldly come to the throne of grace; to the door of life; and be assured, that, if he desires sincerely to enter, he will not be shut out.
JUSTIFICATION.—THE DUTY OF BELIEVING.
Ronass iii. 28—Therefore we conclude, that a man is justified by faith, wilhout the
deeds of the Law :
MORE CORRECTLY RENDERED,
In the last discourse, I attempted to show, that in consequence of the redemption of Christ, Man is justified freely by the grace of God. The grace of God is the source, the moving cause, of this blessing to mankind. The next subject of consideration, before
us, is the Means, by which man, in the economy of redemption, beiceice, y comes entitled to this blessing. These, in the text, are summed up
in the single article, Faith ; which is here declared to be the instrument of justification. To elucidate this truth is the design, with which I have selected the present theme of discourse.
But before I enter upon the doctrine in form, it will be necessary to remind you, that an Objection is raised against it at the threshold; which, if founded in truth, would seem to overthrow it at once. It is this: that faith is so far from being of a moral nature, as to be necessary, and unavoidable : man being absolutely passive in believing, and under a physical impossibility of doing otherwise than he actually does ; whether in believing, or disbelieving. Of course, it is further urged, An attribute, governed wholly by physical necessity, can never recommend us to God; much less become the ground of so important a blessing, as justification.
It will be easily seen that, so long as this objection has its hold on the mind, and is allowed its full import, the doctrine of justification by faith can never be received, unless in a very imperfect and unsatisfactory manner. If faith is a thing, over which we have no control ; if we believe only under the influence of a physical necessity, and, whether we believe or disbelieve, it is physically impossible for us to do otherwise ; then it is plain, that Faith is so far from being praiseworthy, amiable, and capable of recommending us to God, as to merit and sustain no moral character at all. According to this scheme, therefore, faith and unbelief, being equally and absolutely involuntary and unavoidable, can never constitute a moral distinction between men. Faith can never be an object of the approbation; nor unbelief of the disapprobation of God. Much less can we be praiseworthy in believing, or blameable in disbelieving. Still less can we on one of these grounds be rewarded, and on the other punished. Least of all can we,
in consequence of our faith, be accepted, and blessed for ever; and, in consequence of our unbelief, be rejected, and punished with endless misery
All these things, however, are directly and palpably contradictory to the whole tenour of the Gospel. In this, faith is approved, commanded, and promised an eternal reward. Unbelief, on the contrary, is censured, forbidden, and threatened with an everlasting punishment. Faith, therefore, is the binge, on which the whole evangelical system turns. If ye believe not that I am he; ye shall die in your sins; He, that believeth on the Son, hath everlusting life; and he that believeth not, shall not see life; are declarations, which, while they cannot be mistaken, teach us, that all the future inte rests of man are suspended on his faith; and are, at the same time, declarations, to which the whole Evangelical system is exactly conformed. If, then, our faith and disbelief are altogether involuntary, and the effect of mere physical necessity; God has annexed everlasting life and everlasting death, not to any moral character in man, but to the mere result of physical causes. A consequence so monstrous ought certainly not to be admitted. The Scriptures, therefore, must be given up, if this scheme is true.
I have now, I presume, shown it to be necessary, that, before I enter upon the discussion of the doctrine, contained in the text, this objection should be thoroughly examined, and removed. To do this, will be the business of the present discourse.
In opposition to this objection, then, I assert, that Faith, and its opposite, disbelief, are, in all moral cases, voluntary exercises of the mind; are proper objects of commands and prohibitions ; and proper foundations of praise and blame, reward and punishment. This doctrine I shall endeavour to prove by the following arguments ; derived both from Reason and Revelation ; because the objectio:, which I have been opposing, has been incautiously admitted, at times, by Christians, as well as openly, and triumphantly, alleged by Infidels.
1st. Faith is every where commanded in the Scriptures.
This is his commandment, that ye believe on the name of his Son, Jesus Christ. 1 John iii. 23. Now after that John was put in pris. on, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom of God, and saying, The time is fulfilled ; and the Kingdom of God is at hand. Repent ye, and believe the Gospel. Mark i. 14, 15. In these two passages, we have the command to believe the Gospel, delivered by Christ in form; and the declaration of the Evangelist, that it is the commandment of God, that we believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ. Whatever, then, we understand by faith; it is the object of a command, or law, which God has given to mankind; a thing, which may be justly required, and of course a thing, which they are able to render as an act of obedience, at least in some circumstances. God cannot require what man is not physically able to perform. But all obedience to God is volunta Vol. 11.