Billeder på siden
PDF
ePub

985]

for High Treason.

have fully proved the treason and the overt act laid in the indictment. We think it may reasonably be concluded from the evidence, that the prisoner has conspired, consulted and agreed to raise and levy war within this kingdom, to depose and murder the king; that he has written to and received from his correspondents abroad many letters to procure foreign assistance for that purpose; and the Court will inform you, gentlemen, that this is treason in the prisoner at the bar.

L. C. Baron. Gentlemen of the Jury, Francis Francia stands indicted of high treason, for compassing and imagining the king's death; contriving to depose him from the throne, and And to advance the Pretender to the crown. there are laid in the indictment several overt acts; one is, that he consulted and agreed to raise an insurrection and rebellion against the king: and that for that purpose he wrote letters to divers foreigners, to solicit and procure arms, men and money, and to cause an invasion; and caused those letters to be sent to divers foreigners in France.

This is the substance of the indictment; and to prove this, it has been shewn you how he was taken and seized. And Mr. Smith tells you, it was upon the 19th day of September, 1715, that he had a warrant to seize him; that he went with another messenger, since deceased, whose name was Wilcox, and found him and a woman in bed. The prisoner in a little time got up. He tells you there was a closet in the room, the door whereof he caused to be opened, and in it, upon a shelf, found a parcel of letters lying open in folio, wrote in French, and a book, that has been produced, lying upon the desk. He put up the letters and the book together; when he had so done, says the prisoner, "What do you take that book for? That is my copy-book of my letters to my correspondents, and there is nothing material in that." The messenger took notice of a sort of writing at the end of it, that he knew it by again, and the prisoner said, "That was his son's writing." It has been deduced to you, that the book and the letters that have been produced to you, are the same book and letters that were seized in the prisoner's house, and carried to my lord Townshend's office.

Mr. Walpole tells you on what day the warrant was granted, and that the next day the book and papers were delivered to him by the messenger; that he looked over them with Mr. Buckley, and then he carried them to my lord Townshend; and that the prisoner owned the letters upon his examination before my lord, and said, "This is my book of my letters to my correspondents: some of them were entered by me, and the rest of them by my son." This is proved to be the same book; and upon perusal of the letters, Mr. Walpole proves them to be the same that were brought to him by the mcssenger.

Mr. Buckley says, that when these letters were brought to the office, he read several of

them; and that when Mr. Walpole went to
Holland, they were left with him, and he copied
Mr. Buckley
several passages out of them.
was present at the prisoner's examination, but
cannot say any thing as to the book's being
shewn to him, because he was busy in taking
the examination; but says, that Francia, upon
his examination, would not be sworn upon a
New Testament; but took a book out of his
He subscribed his name
pocket, and was sworn upon that, that his exa-
mination was true.

to it, and it was read over to him. It was ob-
jected, that he was refused the liberty of read-
ing it: but there was no such thing; he might
have read it, and it was read to him, and he
was never refused to read it.

And

My lord Townshend informs you, that he' having received an information, that a correspondence was carried on between the duke D'Aumont, the late duke of Ormond, and Mr. Harvey, and that letters past between them by means of the prisoner, there were orders sent to the post-office, to stop all letters directed to Francia; that the prisoner being examined before my lord, owned all these letters. says he, "As to my own letters, I appeal to my book which will shew them," these are so "What others write many evidences that he owned this book to be the book of his letters. to me," says he, "cannot affect me; but as for my own letters I appeal to my book." My lord says, there seemed to be a disposition in him to tell all he knew, and he offered to explain the letters there produced; that at the next time Mr. Harvey's letter was produced, and he explained the figures in that letter; and my lord Townshend then took him to be sincere, but he found afterwards, that he had not discovered all he knew. These letters were laid upon the table during the time of the examination, and were taken back again. The prisoner asked several questions about money being given him, and more offered to him, by my lord Townshend. My lord gave an account of that, and says, that the prisoner pretended to be in a miserable condition, his wife starving, and he begged hard for something, pretending to be miserably poor; and as he was going away, as mere alins, my lord gave him three, or four, or five guineas, not as any encouragement to him to swear any thing, but as mere alms, because he begged so hard, and pretended to be in so miserable a condition. Then he desired to know, whether it was not promised him, that his examination should not be produced against him. He was told, that if he was candid, there should be no advantage taken against him, and that my lord would intercede on his behalf; and if he had been so, no doubt, my lord would have done what he could to incline the king to be favourable to him; but after this, my lord found he knew a great deal more than he would discover. His wife came indeed to my lord, and pretended she could

* As to this, see in Leach Mrs. Rudd's Case. See, too, Dr. Dodd's Case, in the same book.

prevail upon him to discover, if she might be admitted to him; but after this, when he was in Newgate, a letter was found directed to his wife, in which he said, he met with good company in Newgate, and hoped he had said nothing against Mr. Harvey which would preju- | dice him; and upon this, my lord Townshend did not think him so sincere as he pretended to be at first. Mr. Buckley proves that letter to be of his hand-writing. In it he desires his wife to make herself easy, "They were all Tories that were there; he had good company, and the business will be at an end in a fortnight." What business could be mean? Nothing but that about which the correspondence was, and “God will assist us; I know nothing against Mr. Harvey, he is only suspected to be for the affair, he was well known to be so before; and if all were here that are so, he believed three parts of the nation would be there." So that he had a good opinion of the cause, and that it would be over in a fortnight.

Harvey, by Payen alias D'Aulmay, was the design of the Pretender to invade these king. doms; this he could not know, unless he had been privy to the design. If a maa is privy to a treasonable design, and contributes to carry it on, it is not then barely a misprision: If he comes to the knowledge of treason, without being otherwise concerned in it, and does not discover it to a magistrate, this is misprision of treason; but if he assents to the treason, or acts in carrying it on, it is high-treason.

In the next examination it is, that he shews what the marks in Mr. Harvey's letter siguify: That 22 is the duke D'Aumont, 6 the French king, 17 is the word Tory, and believes that by 8 is to be understood the Pretender, and by 9 is to be understood his majesty. There are some marks that he does not know, but his knowing thus far the signification of these marks, shews that he was privy to the design.

Mr. Harvey's letter is annexed to this exa. mination, and that has been read to you; there are some things remarkable in that letter, This examination was also proved by Mr. though a great part of it seems to be about some Stanhope, who says, that the letter of Mr. Har- money that he wanted to be paid him; yet at vey annexed to it, was produced at council to the end he says, Press 22 to think of his friends; Mr. Harvey; that he was in the utmost confu- it will be well for 6; all things look well for 8, sion, changed countenance, desired to with- and in my heart, I think better than ever; 9, draw, and to have liberty to speak to a certain says he, every day loses himself, and for the Jord: My lord Townshend, and Mr. Stanhope, 24000 that makes for 8 and 6, that is, for the both thought him in a good disposition to dis- Pretender and the French king. He says, that cover, but that very night he stabbed himself. opening the cover the letter stuck to the seal, As to the examination, he pretended he was not and that was the reason that he kept it by him, suffered to read it; but Mr. Stanhope says, and did not send it forward. If this man had that every thing of consideration was repeat- not been for carrying on the design, it had been ed more than once or twice; and after the his duty to have carried this letter to the secre first night's examination, he represented him-tary of state, he ought to have discovered it to self to be in a miserable condition, and there- a magistrate; but instead of that, be owns, upon my lord Townshend did give him some that he has since written other letters that have money, what it was he knows not; and this been read to you. was after he had signed his examination, and At the beginning of the correspondence shewed no reluctancy to it; and says, that D'Aulmay desires to have some news, and he would not have been denied to have read Francia tells him, there was a discourse of a it, if he had desired it. This examination marriage in forwardness between the prince being thus proved, it appears to have been at Lorrain and the arch duchess." Let me taken as fairly and carefully in all respects, know, says he, what is in it, for it is for the inand with as much kindness to the prisoner terest of your wife," for he had married a wife as could be things were gone over and whose name was Butler. D'Aulmay_writes over again. It has been read, and there are word again, "as for the marriage of the C―r some things in it that explain this correspon- St. G- -e;" but it is in answer to the former dence, and tell you how it was begun and car-letter, and it is known that he was called by the

ried on.

[ocr errors]

It was begun by means of a law-suit that was recommended to him to manage here, and that brought on the correspondence between him and the abbot Butler: This began a little before the queen's death, and it continued till within a few days of the prisoner's examination. During that correspondence he received several letters from the abbot, directed to Mr. Harvey, and several were conveyed to the abbot from Mr. Harvey, which were sometimes brought by Mr. Harvey himself, and sometimes sent by other hands. The prisoner also explains the initial letters and numbers in Mr. Harvey's letter, and then tells you, that be believes the subject matter of the letters wrote to Mr.

name of the Chevalier St. George; so that it must be the same person. He says, "there had been some talk of that marriage, but no mention had been made of it lately, I am of opinion, says he, that it will not be a sure way to bring his affairs to a happy issue; a party-war would be of more advantage:" Francia writes again to D'Aulmay, and complains, that some letters had not been answered, though entirely for the affair. And what that affair is, must be left to you to judge. Besides, says he, I must tell you, that persons of 50 or 60 thousand crowns a year will not run the hazard of losing such estates, unless more encourage ment is given them; you will be understood if you mention it to that lord. And I must add,

that the misfortune of a certain person is more owing to your delays on the other side the water, than to the party that is against him. They would have you think, that by persons of 50 or 60 thousand crowns a year, was meant a person in France, that had suffered by being concerned in the revenues; but it is plain, it is meant of persons here, that would not hazard their estates: And he adds, You will be understood if you mention this to duke D'Aumont. There are other letters from the prisoner; in one he tells D'Aulnay, he would advise them to satisfy Mr. Harvey, I am persuaded to deal with him as has been done is no good policy; and if ever I have the honour to talk face to face with you, I will shew you clearly, how unhappily, through negligences, very important affairs have miscarried; this must be the affair of the Pretender, and not of the law-suit: The affair that concerned Mr. Harvey, for Mr. Harvey had nothing to do with the law-suit, but by his letter shews himself to be concerned for what makes for 8 and 6, that is for the Pretender and French king.

There is another letter from Francia, wherein he writes, "What you tell me at the end of your letter, of your having spoken in the manner I desired you, is sufficient, and consequently we are now to expect every thing from your side of the water, that is to say, explications," &c. I must leave it to you to consider what he meant by that.

In another letter he says, "I am ordered to tell you on the part of Mr. Harvey, that you will do him a pleasure in desiring the duke D'Aumont, in his name, to send hither some persons to fetch the horses and dogs he has had so long, or else to send orders to somebody to take them: Affairs are here in such a situation, that great precautions must be used to avoid giving umbrage to those who are in power. When I have any thing particular to write to you, I will do it by a strange hand, and will sign Jacques Chrêtien. Take notice of this, and provided you let me know you received this letter, without its having been opened, I shall be easy." There then began to be more difficulty, and therefore the correspondence must be carried on in that name, and in a strange hand. In another letter he writes, " Mr. Harvey gives his service to you, and bid me tell you, when any thing new offers, if he cannot write himself, he will get J. C. to write for him." That must be Jacques Chrêtien.

He goes on," and that at last, God blessing the just cause of our friend, will let him gain his suit; at least, assistance and powerful solicitations shall not be wanting."

There are other letters which shew he knew the design, and was privy to it; "Our friend's cause will soon be ready, God willing, to be tried." That could not be the law-suit depending on this side the water; for that letter was wrote from France; and he says, " All preparations are making for it. The friend who is related to my wife," that is, the duke of Ormond, "has read your two letters, and is mightily pleased with them." Which implies, that he had wrote letters, though they are not entered in the copy-book.

Then he writes upon the 24th of August, under the name of Payen; "I am very much astonished I did not hear from you by the post which arrived yesterday. Our friend was at my house expecting it. We both of us desire you not to let one post go without writing to us, and letting us know all that passes relating to the cause of our common friend." That can not be the cause of Butler's or D'Aulmay's friend that was depending here. There are several other letters which have been read to you, which mention both those causes, and shew that he made a distinction between them.

On the 14th of September, says D'Aulmay, "The contents of your last without a date were very agreeable to me, as well as to all our friends, who give you thanks for it, and have ordered me to tell you so, and to desire you to continue. We know already part of what you tell us about the cause of our friend, which will soon end (please God) to his satisfaction, or all appearances would deceive us. As to my own cause, I cannot help telling you, that my fate is very unhappy to have to do with so dishonest

a man."

I think this is the substance of most of the letters that have been read to you, which relate to his correspondence, in endeavouring to procure the Pretender to make an invasion here.

Upon these letters it has been observed, that the cause of the Pretender is one, and the cause of the law-suit is another; but in all these letters there is plain mention made of the Pretender; advising how to bring it on, and giving intelligence about it. And these letters being in the prisoner's custody, and written to him, and having such treason in them as is mentioned; and he keeping these letters by him, is Then there are other letters from D'Aulmay a great evidence that he assented to the transto Francia, which were found in the prisoner's action, and to the endeavouring to bring the custody; and several of them import his having Pretender over, and to contrive, as well as be received letters from Francia. In one of them could, to carry on the affair. If he had reD'Aulmay says, "You are in the right to in-ceived but one letter, and did not design to proveigh against the indolence you reproach us with; but be persuaded, it is only so in appearance. I even hope, that by this time you have convincing proofs of it, and that suitable returns are made to the good dispositions of your side." This grew near the time of the rebellion. This letter was dated the 7th of August, and the rebellion broke out in October.

[ocr errors]

mote the cause, he should have carried it to the secretary of state, and then he had done his duty. But to receive so many letters,* and to

*At O. B. Sept. sess. 1784, colonel Gordon was tried for the murder of lieutenant colonel Thomas in a duel. The letter from col. Gordon, containing the challenge, was carried by bis

keep them so loug, is an evidence that he assented to the matter, and that he did write such letters as are mentioned to be received from him.

On the behalf of the defendant, there was an objection made by his counsel, that the defendant is an alien born; and that is an objection to the indictment! He is indicted as a natural born subject, and they have examined several witnesses to prove him an alien. The proof is strong, and you will find him an alien, and so that matter must be left specially for the judgment of the Court, and you must find the other fact: And if you believe that he did promote the invasion, or conceal and assent to that design, that is, a conspiring the death of the king, then he will be guilty of the treason charged in the indictment.

It has been objected, that in one of the letters, the person who wrote those letters complains, that he had not heard of the prisoner in three months; but that is a mistake, for that was in a postscript wrote by another person, and in a different hand; for the very same letter shews, that there were letters received from him within that time.

They say, there is no direct proof that he intended the life of the king; but if he kept a correspondence, and promoted the intended invasion, that is in law conspiring the death of the king.

They have produced some people who have given an extraordinary sort of evidence, of what Mr. Buckley and my lord Townshend should say about this matter, as if they promised him great things, if he would swear against Mr. Harvey. Simon Francia said, that Mr. Buckley told him, if his brother would swear against Mr. Harvey, he should have a good reward; and that my lord Townshend said, he had given him five guineas, he should have more.

Lucy White said, that she was in Newgate, and Francia desired her to conceal herself when Mr. Buckley came: That Mr. Buckley told him, be must swear right or wrong for the government; and if he did not swear against Mr. Harvey, Mr. Buckley would charge him with high-treason, for be had cheated my lord Townshend of his money, and done nothing for it.

servant, and delivered to the servant of colonel Thomas. Colonel Thomas's servant brought a letter in answer back, and delivered it to colonel Gordon's servant; but it did not appear that the letter was in fact ever delivered to colonel Gordon himself; yet Mr. Baron Eyre admitted an attested copy of it to be read against the prisoner and left it with the jury as legal evidence, if they were of opinion that the original had ever reached the prisoner's hands. Mr. Baron Hotham concurred; but Mr. Justice Gould thought that positive proof ought to have been given, that the original had come into the prisoner's possession, and cited Françia's Case.

Mary Meggison swears, that Mr. Buckley should say, he would swear against him, be cause he had cheated my lord Townshend of five guineas, and would not swear against Mr. Harvey.

Mr. Buckley was called again, and he denies it: he says there was no such thing. And it seems improbable that a man of his credit should talk thus to the prisoner; therefore the credit of Mr. Buckley must be left to you, against the credit of those two women. He tells you, that Francia sent to him, to desire to speak with him, not about Mr. Harvey, but on behalf of one Flint, who is a prisoner in Newgate, and was concerned in writing the ShiftShifted; and Francia sent a message to Mr. Buckley, that he could do a service in suppressing it. Mr. Buckley went to him, and be desired some favour on behalf of Flint, which was granted and Mr. Buckley denies he had any discourse with the prisoner about Mr. Harvey.

Revell was called, and he proves, that Francia sent him to Mr. Buckley, to desire he might speak to him. That he ordered Revell to stand at the door, and he did so, but did not hear what they said.

My lord Townshend tells you, that Mr. Buckley gave him an account, that Francia had sent to him, for the purpose which he mentioned before: that my lord ordered him to go: that he went accordingly, and he gave my lord an account what he had done about the matter, and Flint had some favour shewn hun.

As to Simon Francia, my lord says, he was several times with him, but my lord never pro posed any reward for swearing against Mr. Harvey; but told him, his brother must deal openly, and tell all he knew, and that was the way to recommend himself to favour.

As to the two women, their credit must be left in opposition to my lord Townshend and Mr. Buckley, which of them you will believe, for they deny what the others have sworn.

Then they call another witness Everall: he tells you, that the prisoner's foreign letters were brought to his house; that they lay in an open window, and sometimes remained there some days, and any body might see them; and from thence they infer, that they must be of no great consequence: but how can you infer that? Who can tell by the superscription of a letter who it comes from, or what are the contents of it? But these people cannot say that these were all the letters that were sent to him.

There is an objection made to the book; & witness says, he has looked upon it, and that none of the book seems to be of his hand-wri

ting; he says, Francia writes a fuller hand. Simon Francia has looked upon it, and says, not a syllable is of his writing; and others tell you, they believe it is not his hand, and that he was three months lame of a rheumatism. As for that, it is not material whose writing it is, if it contains the copies of his letters, and be

has owned before three witnesses, that it is the copy-book of his letters.

Dr. Cade tells you he was ill, and thence they infer, that it is not probable that he should write letters so constantly as he did. He tells you, that from the 2nd of November 1714, to the 18th of the same month, he was in pain in one of his hands, but does not know which of them, nor whether he was able to write: but this was before this correspondence by letters that have been read to you began.

Then they call some witnesses to his reputation: one tells you, that in discourse with him about the late peace, he said, it would ruin the nation; that sort of evidence is of no significa. tion. Mr. Slater has known him four or five years; there was a commission of bankruptcy against him, on which occasion he became acquainted with him. He says, he always seemed to espouse the interest of the king of France, but he always laughed at our parties among ourselves. Those that were for the interest of

France, would of consequence laugh at our

divisions.

Richardson says, that he used to go to the prisoner often in his sickness, and knows no harm of him: that Francia liked him, and called him Vulcan, and bid him drink king George's health, and drank it himself.

This is the substance of the evidence that has been given on both sides: now, if you believe these letters were wrote to him and by him, and that they contain a correspondence of a treasonable nature, inciting' or encouraging any persons to levy war against the king, or any thing which shews that he was privy and assenting to it, then he is guilty of high treason. If you do not believe those letters were his, or that they do not amount to such a correspondence, then you must acquit him.

If you find him guilty, then you must also find that he was born in France, and is an alien.

verdict; and when they returned into Court, Then the Jury withdrew to consider of their were called over, and answered to their names. Cl. of Arr. Gentlemen, are you all agreed on your Verdict ?-Jury. Yes. Čl. of Arr. Who shall say for you? Jury. Our Foreman.

hand. (Which he did.) Look upon the pri Cl. of Arr. Francis Francia, hold up thy High Treason whereof he stands indicted, or soner, how say you?

Not Guilty?

Foreman. Not Guilty.

Is he Guilty of the

Whereupon the prisoner was discharged.

452. Proceedings on an Impeachment and Act of Attainder, for High Treason, against HENRY Lord Viscount BOLINGBROKE: 1 & 2 GEORGE I. A. D. 1715.*

June 10, 1715.

THE House of Commons having taken into consideration the Report from the Committee of Secrecy, resolved to impeach Henry viscount Bolingbroke of High Treason, and other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

August 4.

Mr. Walpole, from the Committee of Secrecy, acquainted the House, that the committee had, in obedience to the commands of the House, prepared Articles of Impeachment of High Treason, and other High Crimes and Misdemeanors, against Henry viscount Bolingbroke: and that the committee had commanded him, at the same time, to acquaint the House, that they shall, in a short time, have further Articles to lay before the House against the said viscount: and that the committee had directed him to report the Articles, already prepared, to the House; and he read them in his place, and afterwards delivered them in at the clerk's table: where they were once read; and are as follow; viz.

*See in this same year the Cases of the duke of Ormond, lord Strafford, and lord Oxford.

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT OF HIGH
TREASON, AND OTHER HIGH Crimes
AND MISDEMEANORS, AGAINST HENRY
VISCOUNT BOlingbroke.

"Whereas a Treaty of Alliance was made and concluded, on or about the 7th day of September 1701, between Leopold then emperor of Germany, his late majesty king William the Third of ever-glorious memory, and their high mightinesses the States General of the United Provinces, for repelling the greatness of the common danger which threatened all Europe, from the duke of Anjou's having taken possession of the monarchy of Spain; wherein it was, among other things, agreed, That, in case the said 'confederates shall be forced to enter into a war, they shall communicate their designs to one another, as well in relation to the actions of the war, as all other things wherein the common cause is concerned: and that it shall 'not be permitted to either party, when the war is once begun, to treat of peace with the enemy, unless jointly and by a communica'tion of counsels:' and, in and by a defensive

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

+ See this Report in the Parl. Hist. as re-treaty and alliance, made and concluded in or ferred to in lord Oxford's Case.

VOL. XV.

about the month of November, 1701, between

3 S

« ForrigeFortsæt »