Billeder på siden
PDF
ePub

against the life of a subject, ought to set forth aed and issue joined. What I shall say (still sufficient certainty of the fact.

[ocr errors]

denying they are right in time, but to satisfy the gentlemen and mankind) in answer to this objection, is, if it had been made before plea pleaded, there is not the least colour in it, whatsoever signification the word may have, taken abstractedly; if it be a classical word, and was before the invention of priuting, which was but

Mr. Ketelbey. My lord, the last service we can do for our unfortunate client is, to move in arrest of judgment; and if the words inserted in the indictment to set forth the substance, the very gist of the treason, are uncertain, and do not sufficiently denote the offence intended to be charged; this is the proper time, as we ap-four or five hundred years ago, I believe toprehend, to take advantage of that defect. body that is acquainted with the Latin la My lord, this word impressit' is an equivo-guage, but will allow that the usage of two e cal word, of different siguifications, imports several senses in English; and though we should admit that it likewise signifies to print, yet if it equally signifies other things, if no Latin word be added to it to restrain, nor any Anglice' to explain the sense of it, we hope your lordship will not proceed to judgment upon this Indictment; and in this case more especially, since printing is essential to the offence of which the prisoner is found guilty; and some of the significations of this word impressit' are criminal, and others not criminal within this act of parliament: And for this 1 shall only cite the common known case of an action of troverde uno pullo' without any Latin adjective or Anglicè;' there the declaration has been held to be naught, for the uncertainty, even after a verdict; and we apprehend the objection will hold much stronger in an indictment for high treason, and that an Anglicè,' or some other proper Latin word, ought to have been annexed, to pin down the word impressit' to that sense only, which the act of parliament hath made criminal.

But, my lord, I shall beg leave to go a little further, and to observe upon the word 'imprimo,' that it doth not, nor can signify printing at all: 'imprimo' is a classical word, and as such cannot properly signify printing, which is a modern invention, never known in the world till many hundred years after the word 'imprimo' had obtained its just and determinate sense; but if they will have a Latin word for printing, without the assistance of an Anglicè, it must be by such phrases as will import that, and that only; such as the best modern Latinists have made use of to express their sentiments, when they treat of that subject.

This is what we have to offer to your lordship against the word 'impressit,' and hope it will be thought sufficient to arrest the judgment.

Attorney General. My lord, I do not know how this motion comes to be made now, after the opinion given by your lordship. If this he any thing, it is improper Latin; that is, it is not a word proper to denote what is intended to be expressed in this indictment; that is the meaning of this objection, which should have been made before plea pleaded and evidence given, and not moved in arrest of judgment, according to the statute for regulating of trials in cases of high treason: that if the word 'impressit' or 'impressione' is not a proper word to denote printing, which is the amount of this objection, they are not entitled to take advantage of this as improper Latin now after plea plead

three hundred years will give a sanction and signification to any word, though it hath been applied to a fact not at that time used; there fore imprimatur liber' is as much known of all men of literature, or all bodies of literature, to mean that that book shall be printed, as any Latin word whatsoever is known what it means, Let them look into any books licensed by say of the universities, what is it but imprimator by the archbishop? what is it but imprimatur by the secretaries of state, or any other person! Is there any other word made use of but 'im primatur,' when any trial hath been printed by the authority of your lordships the judges, the word is used there; look into a law-book, bave they not seen it signed with the word 'imprimatur' under the authority of all your lordships the judges? What can give more sanction than the opinion of all the judges to the proper use of this word? What other word is there for the denoting of printing? Why, my lord, 'imprimatur libellum,' it is the joining of it to libellum,' diversifies it from any other meaning, however indefinite, or, as they say, equivocal, the word is; it is according to the subject-matter to which it is applied: if to a book, it is to be applied to the printing of that book. Is this the first time this word 'impressit' was ever used in an indictment? I appeal to every record, whe ther ever any other word was used, or Anglicè' put to it, but the subject-matter it was applied to? I say still, they are in the right to do every good office to serve their client; but they have mistaken their season; they are ex cluded by the words of the act of parliament, and the opinion of your lordship. But still I insist, this is the constant opinion of the use and application of this word by men of the law, without making use of any Anglice,' by all men of literature and bodies of literature; if all these experiences can give a sanction to the use of that word, we have that to justify us in making use of the word here.

Serjeant Cheshire. I perceive the gentlemen do not say this is an improper Latin word, be cause they know then this is not a proper time to offer it in arrest of judgment: but, be that as it will, I beg leave to insist upon it, that it is a proper Latin word, and properly applied; and I would beg leave to consider, whether words that may he capable of several significations, when applied to particulars, may not be under stood what they mean, without any Anglicè?" If I mistake not, 'Liber,' that very word, may be capable of four significations: it signifies Bacchus,' it signifies free,' it signifies ‘▲

[ocr errors]

[1398 book,' and it signifies the bark of a tree.' equally of consequence with this; they do not Now, imprimere hunc librum,' would any pretend that any other proper word was used body think this improper without saying im- by the Romans; although they have used this primere hunc librum, Anglicè this book? ever since the use of printing was found out, Therefore, admitting impressit' could be ca- as the proper word to signify printing. pable of other significations to many purposes, I believe there is not one instance to be yet when it is impressit libellum," it must be shewn, wherever any other word was used to understood to be printing; as when it is im- siguify the printing of a libel. They say, it is primere hunc librum;' they should say they of an equivocal sense, and may mean stamping do not mean a book, but impressit' the bark as well as printing. In this case, as the word of a tree. I think this objection is so contemp-impressit' is coupled with other words, it cantible, that it ought not to have a further an

swer.

not mean stamping impressit libellum.' Is it possible for any press or stamp to signifyin his Anglicanis verbis ?' Therefore, to shew how groundless this objection is, that it is impossible it should have any such meaning, cap a stamp set forth all these English words in the indictment? That he impressit,' therefore, must signify that he printed. My lord, with great submission, we think it is an objection taken merely for the sake of objecting, because driven to the last extremity. As for the instance of 'uno tenemento,' and' uno pullo,' it is not to the purpose; 'pullo' signifies any young, and tenementum' is well known in

Mr. Lutwych. My lord, as to the time, I only beg leave to mention the clause in the act of parliament; that gives him the liberty of having counsel, and copy of the indictment, and several other privileges; therefore, as this Jaw hath given him these privileges, which they had not before, it comes in by way of proviso, and takes away this part of the advantage they had before, that they shall not take advantage of any mis-writing, mis-spelling, false or improper Latin, after plea pleaded and evidence given: so that they are out of time, as they have had the advantage of this act of parlia-the law for a very universal term; therefore it ment, if it depended singly on that matter. As to the notion of the word impressit' being improper, I believe somebody would have lit on this objection before, if any thing in it; for it hath been the constant method to use this word impressit,' to signify printed,' without an Anglicè,' or any thing like it. I believe the precedents are all so. We apprehend it is a very vain objection, and no weight in it; and therefore we hope no regard will be had to it.

[ocr errors]

becomes necessary to be explained. This word cannot want any explanation. Therefore we hope no regard will be given to this objection; and pray your lordship's judgment against the prisoner at the bar.

Mr. Hungerford. My lord, they object to us, in the first place, that we are improper in point of time as to this objection; that it ought to have been made before the prisoner pleaded or evidence given. And it is further said, that Mr. Reeves. I must agree, that when im- though we were proper in point of time, yet primo' was a Latin word, it was long before there is nothing in the objection itself. As to printing was; but when printing came to be in the time of making this objection, surely, conuse, that Latin words we see have been im· sidering the nature of it, it may be made at any proved; and though they have signified other time. The offence made treason by the act of things, yet when they come to be applied to parliament, is printing: we say, there is no particular circumstances, are improved there-word in the indictment which imports (at least by. Every body knows what that is, when it determines the signification of the word according to the subject-matter. Nothing is more plain than to determine it not to signify any thing but printing, to say per prædict. impressionem,' he declared and affirmed by printing; no other sense can be put on the word but by printing; and since it hath gained that use, no other word is made use of either in legal proceedings or otherwise; and what other word can be applicable to this impressit libellum,' but printing? We humbly hope this is as clear a case as can be. They admit, if we had added an Anglicè,' it would have been proper; I do not know any Anglicè' that would have helped it, taking it to be an improper word: though, as we apprehend, they are not in proper time to make this objection; it should have been before plea pleaded.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Mr. Bootle. Admitting they are in proper season to make this objection (which we apprehend they are not,) there is nothing in the objection. This is the new light that hath sprung up in this cause, The first objection was

necessarily imports) printing; and, if so, then consequently there is no charge of treason before the Court: and surely, it may be at any time urged, that the proceeding is null and void, if there be any fatal error in it whereby to make it so. But the king's counsel seem to have waved this objection as to the impropriety of the time, by going into the nature of the objection itself; and I shall therefore apply myself to what they have said upon that head.

·

[ocr errors]

Mr. Attorney observed, that the word used in licensing of books is imprimatur,' and that impressit (which is the same verb in the active mood) is the word used in the indictment. I will admit it, that • imprimatur' is used for licensing the printing of books, particularly when books are licensed by the universities (and for my part I wish all books were licensed by them, I am sure there would then be no heresy or trea. sou in them); but generally licences for printing are in English: but that which I offer to your lordship's consideration in this matter is, that though in an university imprimatur,' a loose

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

bishops and bishops, and to what they do; but, as I take it, their licences are generally signed by their secretaries or chaplains: whether they have any legal authority for the licensing of books, or if it amounts to any thing more than a bare recommendation of the goodness of a book, under the protection of a great name, I cannot tell; and therefore with the utmost deference submit it to your lordship's judgment, whether any weight can be laid on those instances.

The universities have certainly, at this time, a right to licence books printed within their respective jurisdictions, and I believe they gene

signed by the chancellor; but this privilege is of a very late date, it being not many years since books were first printed there. I pray God bless the universities, continue to them their present authority, and increase it: but we must not admit that the modern use of a word, though by those learned bodies, can give such a sanction to the sense of it, as to make it a conclusive answer to our objection.

Give me leave, my lord, to follow him a lit-rally use the word imprimatur,' and it is tle in this criticism. I believe the word liber doth not denote so many different things as the very learned serjeant would seem to intimate. In the very early ages of the world, before writing was a common accomplishment, before vellum, parchment, or paper were found out, people writ upon the inward rinds or barks of trees, which bark was called 'liber;' and, from thence, when parchment or paper was, in af- | ter-ages, writ upon, that was called liber' Mr. Bootle says, it hath been a word used too: the same practice hath likewise given oc- ever since printing was found out, to signify casion that codex' signifies both the bark of a printing, and that no information hath been tree, and a book: as for liber,' free,' it is al-brought for printing a libel, where that word ways used in an adjective sense, and a noun hath not been made use of; but he is not substantive is always exprest or understood. pleased to mention any ancient precedent, And as for 'liber' signifying Bacchus,' the nor any case where this point hath been judiserjeant hath been at dinner, he hath eat and cially determined; indictments for printing drank plentifully, I dined with him, and I find libels were very rare in former times, and are he hath forgot part of the name of Bacchus, scarcely to be met with in the old law books; for he is called Liber Pater,' and not liber' lately indeed they have been more frequent, only, that I remember. but I believe have not always been drawn by But what I insist upon in this matter, my the most skilful hands; and if some mistakes lord, is, if a man were to be charged within them have been past over in silence and stamping of a book or paper; it would be said without an exception taken to them, we hope a that he impressit' the book or paper; and the faulty modern precedent, upon the rolls in the charge against Mr. Dyett for forging the law-crown-office, shall not have more weight with duty-stamp was in those words; and since, by the it than the universities. charge of impressit libellum,' stamping (which is not high treason) may be as well meant as printing, unless explained by an Anglicè;' I humbly hope judgment shall be reversed in

this case.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

They are pleased to insist, that we have not the liberty now of making this objection, as being out of time; because, in the point of false and improper Latin, it ought to have been offered before plea pleaded: But, my lord, we must beg leave to put this on a right foot; we do not object it as false and improper Latin; we say there is no offence charged in the indictment: the act of parliament says it must be by printing; if they have used a word that doth not signify printing, the indictment cannot be good, this cannot be high treason; my lord, we submit it to your lordship.

The Judges were all of opinion, that the objection did not come out of time, because they did not take it for false and improper Latin.

Mr. Ketelbey. My lord, I shall be very short in what I am going to say. It hath been insisted on, that the common form of licensing books to be printed, by the judges, archbishops and universities, is by using the words imprimatur liber cui titulus, &c.' If any one instance could have been produced where my fords the judges had used that word in allowing the printing of any books, such a precedent would have stopped our mouth as to this objection; but I have here in my hand a large volume of trials and other tracts, that have been licensed, some of them by the judges, and others by the secretaries of state, and lord mayors; yet the said 'imprimatur' is not used in any one of them.-All these licences are in English, and I do not remember any one law Mr. Hungerford. My lord, there is anobook that was ever licensed by the judges in ther objection, which I humbly take the liberLatin. ty to make it is this; the offence made trea I pay all the respect imaginable to the arch-son by this act of parliament is, that if any per

But all agreed, the word impressit' was very proper to signify printing, as used in the indictment, and that there was nothing in the objection.

:

[ocr errors]

son shall maliciously, advisedly and directly, by writing or printing, maintain and affirm that our sovereign lady the queen, that now is, is not the lawful and rightful queen of these realms, or that the pretended prince of Wales, who now stiles himself king of Great Britain, &c. hath any right or title thereto; the language of the act of parliament is, and now' (that is, at the time of making of the act) stiles himself' so and so: but the indictment doth not pursue the words of the act of parliament, in describing the person of the Pretender; for the words in the indictment are these ; "Persona iu vita Jacobi secundi nuper regis Angliæ, &c. pretend. esse princip. Wallie, et post dicti nuper Regis decessum pretenden. esse, et suscipien. sup. se stilum et titulum regis Angliæ per nomen Jacobi tertii ;" so that who now stiles himself, &c.' is not mentioned in any part of the indictment, and consequently the person described or intended by the act of parliament, and the person described in the indictment, may be two different persons; for if a person doth now, or five or six months ago, stile himself king of Great Britain, it answers the description in the indictment of stiling himself king of Great Britain' post dicti nuper regis decessum,' for it is not said-immediately after his death, and yet that person may not be the person who at the time of the act took upon himself the title of king, &c. and since, by the wording of the indictment, it doth not appear that the person there described is the same person with him in the act of parliament, the indictment ought to be assisted with an averment, that the person described in the indictment is una et eadem persona' with him described by the act of parliament, whereby the identity of the person would appear; and, for want of this averment or following of the exact words of the act of parliament, we hope this offence is not sufficiently laid, whereby to affect the prisoner at the bar.

[ocr errors]

Mr. Ketelbey. If they had said 'immediatè post decessum,' they had taken in a greater length of time, than now they have done; and having only laid it 'post decessum,' generally, it may, or it may not, be immediately after the death of the late king James; and then that intermediate space of time is not accounted for or ascertained in the indictment, without such averment as we contend for. The indictment ought to have been certain, in all respects, and to all intents and purposes whatever; but here, since the late king James died before the passing this act, it doth not necessarily appear, it is no natural consequence, that the person who in the life-time of king James the second pretended to be the prince of Wales, is the same person that after his decease pretended to be and took upon himself the stile and title of king of Great Britain.

Att. Gen. My lord, we are not bound, with submission, to pursue the very terms of the act of parliament. If, upon the face of the indictment, it appears the same person is described in the indictment as in the act of parliament, it is

sufficient. There are two descriptions of this person in the act of parliament; the one is, that the pretended prince of Wales, who now stiles himself king of Great Britain; the one is the pretended prince of Wales, and the other king of Great Britain. If Mr. Hungerford may be allowed to mean there may be many Pretenders, though I believe he would not suppose that there were any before the Pretender himself, that called himself the prince of Wales; so that that is plain who is meant by the Pretender. The second part of the description, "who now stiles himself king of Great Britain," post decessum Jacobi secundi nuper regis Angliæ,' is not that semper post decessum;' was not the 'decessum' of king James the second before the making of the act of parliament; and is it not the pretended prince of Wales who, immediately 'post' and 'semper post decessum,' stiles himself king of Great Britain, that brings it down to the time of the act of parliament, and continues it to the time of the indictment laid? The post decessum,' as it stands here, over-reaches the act of parliament in point of time, goes along with it, and continues with it till the indictment preferred.

6

in this Indictment says, who in the life-time of Serjeant Cheshire. My lord, the expression king James the second pretended to be the prince of Wales, and after his death pretended of king of England. The expression in this to be, and took upon himself the stile and title would have it; the late king James was dead indictment says it more plain than as they before any of the acts of parliament, and that less assertion, and not so proper and pertinent'; which they would have us have said, is a much for when he died before the act of parliament, king James the second pretended to be prince he assumed now, (he that in the life-time of stile and title of king of England; so that we of Wales, he assumed now) and ever hath, the have taken in both the times of these acts of second, and after his decease. parliament, in the life-time of king James the

Mr. Hungerford. My lord, I will crave leave to offer a few words by way of reply. The description in the act of parliament, as Mr. Attorney truly observes, consists of two parts, viz. such a person as in the life of the late king James pretended to be prince of Wales, and who, viz. at the time of the act, took upon himself the title of king, &c. The words are in the conjunctive, and therefore, if the description in the indictment takes but one part of the description in the act, it is an imperfect description, and consequently the high-treason not perfectly laid. If it had been, as Mr. Attorney seems to hint, that the person described did semper post decessum' of king James, or immediately post' his decessum,' take upon himself the title of king, &c. it would have been well enough, because it would have amounted to an averment, that the person in the act, and the person in the indictment, was the same individual person; and for want of

such a certainty, we humbly insist, they have failed in a material part of this accusation.

L. C. J. This act of parliament makes it high-treason only with respect to this individual person, who is here called the pretended prince of Wales: Now, if the person hath no where any christian name, or sirname, must we not take notice of the description of him, and how he is called in almost all the acts of parliament? In one act of parliament he is called the pretended prince of Wales: In the act on which this Indictment is founded, he is called the pretended prince of Wales, and that now takes upon himself the stile and title of king of England: In the Abjuration Act, he is called by the name in the indictment; if it be the same person, must not we take notice, this is one and the same person? and if so, no matter which of the names he is described by.

Mr. Ketelbey. My lord, I beg leave to mention one word more. The act of parliament says (any right to the crown of these realms,) and so it goes through in the plural number (hath any right or title to the crown of these realms ;)

it relates to the Union of the two realms of England and Scotland, and from one end to the other mentions them plurally; they have expressed it in the indictment only in the singular number' hujus regni,' and afterwards, innuendo, coronam hujus regni.'

[ocr errors]

Att. Gen. The words are Magne Bri

tanniæ.'

Mr. Ketelbey. With submission, the words are, innuendo, jus hereditarium ad coronam hujus regni,' without Magne Britanniæ.'

[ocr errors]

Att. Gen. The words in the beginning of the indictment are, de et concernen. coron. 'Magnæ Britanniæ;' you have got upon innuendoes again.

Mr. Ketelbey. Why, if you do not like the innuendoes, you may leave them out of the case, and see how it will stand then; if the last innuendo—(' jus hereditarium ad coronam hujus regni') be laid aside, the words of the indictment will be barely, " he hath that to plead in his favour," without any thing more, and then it doth not appear, if you go through without the innuendoes, that it is any offence against the statute.

Mr. Hungerford. My lord, the objection is this, the act of parliament makes it high-treason to affirm, &c. that any person hath a right to the crown of these realms; which expres sion comprehends Great Britain and Ireland; in the indictment they have not mentioned Ireland, it is only ad coronam hujus regni ;' it is indeed Magnæ Britannia' in the beginning; though England and Scotland make one united kingdom, Ireland is not included.

Att. Gen. My lord, we have done, and pray your lordship's Judgment.

Then the Recorder passed sentence, as usual in cases of high-treason; and he was executed at Tyburn, November 6th, 1720, aged nineteen. I don't find he made any Speech, or left any Paper behind him.

[The following Case of a conviction of Treason for publishing a treasonable Paper, I have extracted from the Harleian MSS. in the Brit. Mus. N° 6846, art. 104, fol. 335. I know not exactly the date of the Trial; but it seems likely that sir John Trenchard was Secretary of State when the parties were carried before him. According to Beatson, Trenchard was Secretary of State from 1692 to 1695.]

THE TRIAL OF WILLIAM NEWBOLT AND EDWARD BUTTler, Printers, for High TREASON, IN COMPASSING AND IMAGIN ING THE DEATH OF THEIR MOST SACRED MAJESTIES KING WILLIAM AND QUEEN MARY. [NOW FIRST PUBLISHED FROM THE HARLEIAN MSS. IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM.]

ON Friday, the 8th of this instant September, being the 3rd day of this sessions, the pri soners were brought to the bar, and were ar raigned upon an indictment of high-treason, for composing, printing, and publishing the late king James's Declaration,* &c. To which Indictment they both pleaded Not Guilty; and for their trial they put themselves upon God and their country. Then the jury was called over, and the prisoners having made their law. ful challenge to the number of 26, the Court proceeded to their trial, and the gentlemen sworn to try the issue were those whose names follow :

[blocks in formation]

Then the prisoners desired they might have pen, ink, and paper allowed them, which was granted; and then the Indictment was read again, which set forth, that the prisoners stood indicted by the names of William Newbolt and Edward Buttler, of the parish of St. Margaret's, Westminster, gents. for that they not having God before their eyes, but being moved and instigated by the power of the devil, and being enemies of our sovereign lord and lady the king and queen, and minding and intending to raise war and rebellion in this kingdom, and the government of this kingdom wholly to subvert, alter and change, and a miserable slaughter amongst their majesties' subjects to make, and to depose and put to death their most sacred majesties, on the 20th day of May last past,

* See this Declaration, vol. 12, p. 1209.

« ForrigeFortsæt »