Billeder på siden
PDF
ePub

1717, produced a letter dated London the 8th February, 1717, signed Cowper, C. in which two papers were inclosed, dated the 6th February, 1717, signed William Cowper, Cler' Parliamentor' directed to the lord chief baron of the Exchequer in Ireland, and the rest of the barons of the said Court; alleged by the lord chief baron to be Orders from the Lords in Great Britain, requiring them to restore Maurice Annesley, esq. to the possession of the lands he was dispossessed of; pending his Appeal in the House of Lords of Great Britain.

That on the said 19th day of February, 1717, in pursuance of the said alleged Orders and Letter, (inserted at the end of this Report) though no affidavit had been made, that the said Orders

* "London, the 8th of February, 1717. My Lord Chief Baron; By Order of the House of Lords (a copy whereof 1 herewith send you), I transmit to your lordship, and to the rest of the barons of his majesty's Court of Exchequer in Ireland, the Order of the said House; whereby

or Letter were regularly compared and signed, the said lord chief baron, and the other barons, without any motion by counsel or attorney, ordered an injunction for the restoring the said Maurice Annesley to possession of the lands he was dispossed of; pending his said appeal, in the name of the chancellor, treasurer, and barons of the said court of Exchequer, whereby the sheriff or sheriffs of the county or counties where the said lands lay, was forthwith to put the said Maurice into the possession of the said lands.

That in order to make out the said injunction, the said Court ordered the said Maurice Annesley, his attorney, agent, solicitor or counsel, should forthwith attend the chief remembrancer, or his deputy, with the names of the lands of which the said Maurice Annesley was so dispossessed of, and also the county or counties where the said lands lay.

That upon the 14th of March, 1717, Affidavit was made before the lord chief baron by John Annesley of Ballisax, in the county of Kildare, the barons of that Court are commanded to re- esq. wherein Hester Sherlock was made plainstore Mr. Annesley to the possession of his tiff, and Maurice Annesley, esq. defendant ; estate. Your lordship will immediately com- that he the said John was dispossessed of municate this to the rest of the barons, and let the lands of Little Rath, Darr, Bodingme know, as soon as can be, what is done by stown, and Muilenafooky, which he the said yourself, and the rest of the barons, in pursu-John held by virtue of a lease from the said ance to their lordships' order, as you see by the above-mentioned copy I am ordered to require of you. I am your lordship's most faithful COWPER, C." "To the Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer in Ireland, and the rest of the Barons of the said Court."

servant.

+ Die Jovis, 6th February, 1717. Ordered, By the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in par

liament assembled, That the lord chancellor do transmit the Order of this House to the barons of the Exchequer in Ireland, which requires them to cause possession to be forthwith delivered to Maurice Annesley, esq. of the lands of which he was dispossessed, pending his Appeal in this House, commanding the barons of the Exchequer at the same time to return to this House, as soon as they can, an account of

what shall be done therein.

WILLIAM COWPER, Cler. Parl.

Die Jovis, 6th February, 1717. Upon Report from the Committee of the whole House to whom it was referred, to consider by what methods the Order of this House, for the restoring possession to Maurice Annesley, esq. of the estate in Ireland, whereof he was dispossessed, pending his Appeal in this House, may be most properly enforced and executed: It is Ordered by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in parliament assembled, that the barons of the court of Exchequer in Ireland, do cause the said Maurice Annesley, esq. to be forthwith restored to the possessions of the lands of which he was dispossessed, pending his appeal, which was received by this House the 8th day of June last.

WILLIAM COWPER, Cler. Parl.

Maurice Annesley, pending his said Appeal; and that the said John's lease was then in being and undetermined.

That upon the 14th of March, 1717, the said affidavit of the said John Annesley was filed in the chief remembrancer's office, in order to have the said injunction made out; but before the nation of Mr. John Draycott, attorney for Mrs. said injunction issued, it appears by the examiSherlock in the Exchequer (after having been sworn at the bar of this House), that he the said Draycott attended Mr. John Becher, then in the presence of the said John Annesley indeputy chief remembrancer, at his office, and formed the said Becher, that the said affidavit was insufficient, and that the said Draycott was ready to prove, that the said Maurice Annesley was not at the time of his said Appeal, nor at any time since in possession of the said lands mentioned in the said affidavit; having sold the said lands some years before to Andrew Wilson, esq. and Mrs. Frances Harman.

That by two copies of memorials out of the Register's office (for registering deeds, &c. pursuant to act of parliament), proved by the said Draycott to be true copies of the memorials remaining in the said office, it appears, that by deeds of lease and release bearing date respectively the 1st and 2d days of March, 1714, the lease being made between Jeffery Paul, esq. on the one part, and Andrew Wilson, esq. of the other part; and the release made between the said Jeffery Paul of the first part, said Andrew Wilson of the second part, and Maurice Annesley, esq. on the third part, whereby the several lands of Little Roth, Darr,and Bodingstoun in the parish of Naas, and county of Kildare, were for the considerations

|

therein mentioned, conveyed to the said Andrew Wilson and his heirs for ever: And the right honourable the lord Altham, upon his honour declared, that he knew that John Annesley of Ballisax, esq. had paid rent to the said Andrew Wilson by virtue of, and under the said purchase; but believed that the lord chief baron or the other barons knew nothing thereof. It also appears, that by deeds of lease and release, bearing date respectively the 2d and Sd days of April, 1715, made between Maurice Annesley, esq. of the one part, and Frances Harman of the city of Dublin, widow, of the other part: By which said release the said Maurice Annesley for the considerations therein mentioned, conveyed to the said Frances Harman, and her heirs for ever, the lands of Mullenafooky in the said county of Kildare. That notwithstanding there was no county mentioned in the said affidavit, and said notice given of said sale to the said officer as aforesaid; neither did it appear by the said affidavit, that the said Maurice Annesley was dispossessed of the said lands therein mentioned, pending his appeal, the said injunction issued directly to the sheriff of the county of Kildare, bearing date the 22d February, in the fourth year of his majesty's reign, signed Gulfridus Gilbert, and returnable into the said Court in Quindec. Pasch. then next ensuing.

That by an affidavit sworn by John Annesley on the 7th of May, 1718, before Mr. Baron St. Leger, and filed in the chief remembrancer's office the 9th of the same month; wherein he made Maurice Annesley, esq. plaintiff, and Hester Sherlock, widow, defendant; in which the said John Annesley deposed, That on or about the 15th of March preceding, he delivered the before-mentioned injunction to Alexander Burrowes, esq. then high sheriff of the said county of Kildare; and shewed the said sheriff a letter of attorney from the plaintiff, empowering the said John Annesley to receive the possession of the lands in the said injunction mentioned; but the said sheriff refused to execute the said injunction.

That the said John Aunesley in his proper person, on the 15th of the said month, moved the said Court upon an attested copy of the said affidavit; but the said Draycott insisting that there was no such cause in Court, the said Annesley was directed by the said Court to amend his affidavit and move it again.

That the said Annesley thereupon erased and altered the said copy, and made Hester Sherlock, widow, defendant; and swore the same before Mr. Baron St. Leger, and filed the said affidavit so amended in the chief remembrancer's office, without any alteration made in the body of the said affidavit; which was proved by the deposition of Daniel Reading, esq. deputy chief remembrancer, who was sworn at the bar of this House, and examined before the said lords committee.

That the same day, viz. 13th May, upon reading the said affidavit, the said Court was informed by counsellor Dixon, that what was

sworn in the said affidavit could not be true: For that the said Annesley swore he had a Letter of Attorney from the plaintiff (who was Mrs. Sherlock) to receive possession of the lands therein mentioned; when, in truth, Mrs. Sherlock was then in actual possession of the said lands.

That the lord chief baron said it was only a mistake, and without rectifying the same, on motion of Mr. John Beauman, an attorney, the Court ordered the said sheriff to be fined forty shillings, if he did not return the said injunction in four days; and on said Beauman's several motions, there were fines at several times laid upon the said sheriff for not returning the said injunction, which amounted to 771. which was proved by the minutes of the said Court, and the testimony of the said Draycott.

That the said Draycott likewise proved that the said lord chief baron and the other barons had due notice of the said Order of this House; and the Resolutions thereof made the 11th February, 1703, before any proceedings were had in the said cause, subsequent to the said Order of this House of the Sd of October, 1717, and that the said Annesley and Beauman were served with copies of the said Order and resolutions, before any motions were made by them in the said cause.

That by the minutes of the 13th June, 1718, taken in the said Court, it appears, that Mr. Chancellor of the Exchequer declared, that the Orders of the House of Lords of England being only directed to the barons of that Court; and that he found, that the Order of that Court, which was made thereon, was made as if done by him and the treasurer, as well as by the barons; that he apprehended, that in regard the said Orders were not directed to him, or he present when the said Order of the Court of Exchequer was made, That he had nothing to do therewith, and did not consent thereto.

That it appeared by the testimony of the said Mr. Reading, that the said cause between Sherlock and Annesley was of the Chancery side of the Exchequer; and that all bills in the Chancery side of the said Court were directed to the chancellor, treasurer and barons, and believed, that if a bill was directed otherwise, it would be error.

That upon the 30th of June, 1718, on motion of the said Beauman, an attachment to the pursuivant was awarded against the said Bur rowes for not returning the said injunction, bearing test the 1st day of July, in the fourth year of his majesty's reign, and returnable before the chancellor, treasurer and barons of the said Court, in Crast. Animar. then next.

That upon the 7th July, 1718, the said Burrowes returned the said injunction, and the said Beauman was acquainted therewith by the said Draycott: who told the said Beauman, that he was ready to pay him the cost of imposing the said fines and pursuivant, which the said Beauman refused, and told the said Dray cott, that he must first have the said sheriff in custody That the said Draycott applied

:

again to the said Beauman; and the said Beauman said, he must first lay the said sheriff by the beels.

fit to annex to their Report. That Charles Nuttal, esq. late sheriff of the county of Kildare, by virtue of the said Order of the 3rd of

the determinations and judgments of this High Court of Parliament are final and conclusive, and cannot be reversed or set aside by any other court whatsoever.

That by the testimony of the said Mr. Read-October, put Hester Sherlock into the posing and Mr. Draycott, barons Pocklington and St. Leger, upon 16th July, 1718, sat in the Exchequer chamber on the reducing of fines: That the fines imposed upon the said sheriff were then read by Mr. Becher the officer, who informed the said barons, that the said injunction was returned; that a pistole and seven balf-crowns were paid to the box, and the said fines were then taken off by the said barons.

That upon the same day in the afternoon, the said Becher, Reading, and Draycott were sent for to the lord chief baron's house, where the two other barons were with his lordship; that the said injunction was sent for, and said injunction and return thereon was read, and the barons declared that it was no return; that the said Draycott told his lordship, that he hoped he would at least respite the said fines till the then next term, or give the said sheriff an opportunity to justify his said return, which was refused: that the list of fines, which was that day read in the Exchequer-chamber, was then called for, and the fines imposed upon the said Burrowes were then read: that the said Draycott was obliged to take back the said money, which he had paid to the box for taking off the said fines, and the same were then estreated.

That the return made by the sheriff upon the said injunction, was to this purpose, (viz.) That before the said writ came to him, the Order of this House of the 3rd of October, 1717, and the Resolutions of this House of the 11th of February, 1703, were delivered to him, which he recites in hac verba. Which return* the Lords Committees have though

*The Return upon the Injunction. "Cancellar. Thesaurar. et Baronibus Infrascript. humilime Certifico quod ante Adventum hujus Brevis mihi direct. quædam Resolutiones Præhonorabil. Dom. Procerum hujus Regni Hiber niæ fact. in Parliament. apud Dublin. in hoc Regno Congregat. undecimo die Feb. a. D. Millesimo Septingentesimo Tertio mihi deliberat. fuer. quæ sequuntur in hæc verba, scilicet. Resolutions of the right hon. the House of Peers, the 11th of February, 1703.

"Resolved on the question, nem. con. That if any subject or resiant within this kingdom, shall hereafter presume to remove any cause determined in this High Court of Parliament, to any other Court, such person or persons shall be deemed betrayers of her majesty's prerogative and jurisdiction, and the undoubted ancient right and privileges of this honourable House, and of the rights and liberties of the subjects of this kingdom.

Resolved on the question, nem. con. that if any subject or resiant within this kingdom, shall presume to put in execution any order from any other court, contrary to the final judgment and determination of this High Court of Parliament, such person or persons shall be deemed betrayers of her majesty's prerogative and jurisdiction, and the undoubted ancient rights and privileges of this House, and of the rights and liberties of the subjects of this kingdom. EN STERNE, Cler. Parl.

"Et ulterius Certifico, quod ante Adventum istius Brevis mibi direct. quidam Ordo fact. per Præhonorabil. Domin. Spiritual. et Temporal. in Parliament. in hoc Regno Congregat. geren. dat. Tertio die Octobris, Anno Dom. Millesimo Septengentesimo decimo Septimo etiam mihi deliberat. fuit qui sequitur in hæc verba, scilicet. Die Jovis Tertio die Octobris, 1717." Whereas by the report made from the lords committees appointed to consider the properest method for the relieving of Hester Sherlock, widow, &c. pursuant to what was ordered and adjudged by this House, on the 19th day of June, 1716, in a cause wherein the said Hester Sherlock, widow, was appellant, and Maurice and John Annesley, esqrs. were respondents: As also upon the Resolutions agreed to this day by this House, it appears, that the sum of 1,507l. 14s. 8d. was due to Hester Sherlock, the appellant, upon the 19th day of February, 1716, on account of the principal and interest of the portion of Edward Sherlock, decreed unto the said appellant as administratrix to the said Edward, by this House on the 19th day of June, 1716; and that the lands of Little Rath, Bodingstown, Darr, and Mullenafooky in the barony of Naas and county of Kildare are chargeable with, and liable to the payment of the said sum. It is thereupon ordered by the "Resolved on the question, nem. con. That Lords spiritual and temporal in parliament asby the ancient and known laws and statutes ofsembled, that the high sheriff of the county of this kingdom, her majesty hath an undoubted jurisdiction and prerogative of judging in this her High Court of Parliament, in all appeals and causes within her majesty's realm of Ireland.

"Ordered on motion, That the Petition of Edward earl of Meath, and Cecilia countess of Meath his wife, be read; read accordingly.

"Ordered on motion, That the clerk of the rolls do bring into this House the roll of the acts of parliament of the 38th of Henry the sixth.

"Resolved on the question, nem. con. That

Kildare, do forthwith put the said Hester Sherlock into the possession of the said lands of Little Rath, Bodingstown, Darr, and Mullenafooky, subject to the said sum of 1,507/. 14s. 8d. to be held by her the said Hester, until such time as she shall receive the said sum

session of the premises, and that she was at | barons alleged to be Orders from the House the time of the return in possession thereof; of Lords of Great Britain, dated the 23rd Ja that by reason of their Order and Resolutions, nuary, 1718, signed William Cowper, Cler' he durst not restore Maurice Annesley to the Parliamentor'. In a letter produced by the possession of the lands in the said injunction said barons from the lord chancellor, "dated mentioned, in prejudice and violation of the London, the 27th January, 1718, signed right and privileges of this House. Parker C. which came by the post; directed to the lord chief baron of the Exchequer in Ireland, and the rest of the barons of that

That upon the 7th of November, 1718, upon motion of the said Beauman, the said attachment to the pursuivant against the said Bur-Court; whereby it was ordered, that the rowes was renewed, bearing test the 6th of November last, and returnable before the said chancellor, treasurer and barons in Octabis Sanct. Hilarii then next ensuing; and on the 30th January fellowing, the said attachment was again ordered to be renewed: that the said sheriff, by reason of their said attachments, was obliged to abscond, and thereby prevented from coming upon his accounts, and was upon that account fined by the said Court 1,2001. and upwards.

That upon the 4th February, 1718, the lord chicf baron, and Mr. Baron Pocklington, upon the receipt of three papers, *which the said

chargeable upon the said lands as aforesaid, and this shall be a sufficient warrant in that behalf.

“TO CHARLES NUTTAL, Esq. High-Sheriff of the County of Kildare.

"En Stern. Cler' Parliamentor'. Virtut. cujus Ordin. prædict. Carolus Nuttal posuit prædict. Hester Sherlock in plen. quiet. et pacific. Possession. Omin. Vill. et Terr. prædict. et prædict. Hester Sherlock jam usq; Continuavit in ead. Possession. Præmiss. prædict. secund, tenor, et effect. Ordinis prædict. Ratione quorum Resolution. et Ordin. in Prejudict. et session. Privileg. Parliament. per Leges et Statut. hujus Regni Hiberniæ provis. infra Nominat. Mauric. Annesley, Ar. ad Possession. Separal. Vill. et Terr. de Little Rath, Bodingstown, Darr. et Mullenafooky infra Mencionant. restituer, non audeo. Sic Respond.

"ALEX. BURROWES Ár. vic."

[ocr errors]

session of the estate of the appellant, Maurice Annesley, esq. to be restored to him, as was required by Order of the said House of the 6th February last: and by the other, the said barons are commanded to cause Hester Sherlock to account before them upon oath for the rents and profits of the estate in question, which she has made or received since her gaining possession thereof, by order of the House of Lords in Ireland; and answer and pay the same to the said appellant, Maurice Annesley, esq. but without prejudice to the right, in case of an appeal to be brought by either party from the decree of the Court of Exchequer in Ireland.

"Your lordship will immediately communicate this to the rest of the barons, and return, as soon as you can, an account of what shall be

done by yourself, and the rest of the barons, in pursuance of your lordships' said orders, as you see by the abovementioned copy I am ordered to require of you. I am, your lordship's most faithful servant, PARKER, C.

"To the Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer in

Ireland, and the rest of the Barons. "Annesley vers. Sherlock. Die Veneris 23 Januarii, 1718. Upon Report from the lords committees, appointed to enquire into the reason of the delay, in not obeying the Orders of this House, relating to the appeal of Maurice Annesley, esq. and how the same may more properly be enforced: It is ordered by the Lords spiritual and temporal in parliament as sembled, that the barous of the Court of Ex*Annesley vers. Sherlock. Die Veneris 23 chequer in Ireland be, and are hereby directed Januarii, 1718. Ordered, by the Lords spiri- to proceed by the most speedy and effectual the lord high chancellor of Great-Britain do this House of the 6th of February last, to be retual and temporal in parliament assembled, that methods, to cause possession of the estate of the said Maurice Annesley, as required by Order of transmit the two Orders made this day on the behalf of Maurice Annesley, esq. to the barons stored to him. WM. COWPER, Cler. Pail. of the court of Exchequer in Ireland, commanding them at the same time to return, as soon as they can, an account of what shall be done therein. WM. COWPER, Cler. Parl.

[ocr errors]

London Jan. 27, 1718.

My lord chief baron; By Order of the House of Lords (a copy whereof I herewith send you) transmit to your lordship and the rest of the barons of his majesty's Court of Exchequer in Ireland, two Orders of the said House, made in the cause of Annesley against Sherlock; by one of which the barons of that court are commanded to proceed by the most speedy and effectual methods, to cause pos

66

Annesley vers. Sherlock. Die Veneris 23 Januarii, 1718. Ordered, by the Lords spithat the barons of the Court of Exchequer in ritual and temporal in parliament assembled, Ireland do cause the respondent, Hester Sherrents and profits of the estate in question, which lock, to account before them upon oath, for the she has made or received since her gaining the possession thereof, by the Orders of the House of Lords in Ireland; and to answer and pay the same to the appellant, Maurice Annesley, esq. but without prejudice to the right, in case of an appeal to be brought by either party from the decree of the Court of Exchequer in Ire land. WM. COWPER, Cler. Parl."

never served with the said Injunction or Order; notwithstanding which, she was thereby dispossessed of the said lands about the 20th February last, by the attornments of the tenants; except a small part thereof in the possession of Dennis Galvin.

barons of the said Court of Exchequer, should cause Hester Sherlock to account before them upon oath, for the rents and profits of the estate in question, which she had made or received since her gaining the possession thereof by the Order of the House of Lords in Ireland; and to answer and pay the same to Maurice Annesley, esq. but without prejudice in case of an appeal: also that the barons of the said Court were directed to proceed by the most speedy and effectual methods, to cause possession of the estate of the said Maurice Annesley, as required by their Order of the 6th February, to be restored to him; and also that the chancellor of Great Britain should transmit to the said barons the said Orders, and that they should give an account of what should be done therein.

That without any proof by affidavit, (as usual in courts of equity) the said alleged Orders were regularly signed and compared; and without motion of counsel or attorney, it was ordered in the name of the chancellor and treasurer, lord chief baron, and the rest of the barons of his majesty's court of Exchequer in Ireland, that the injunction of that Court should forthwith issue, directed to the said Hester Sherlock, and to the several and respective tenants of the lands in question; requiring them, and every of them, quietly to restore to the said Maurice Annesley, the possession of the town and lands of Little Rath, Boddingstown, Darr, and Mullenafooky, lying and being in the county of Kildare; the said lands by the said barons supposed to be comprehended in the said Order.

That the said injunction was ordered to be served upon the said persons by the pursuivant attending the said Court, or by any other person or persons whom the said Maurice An. nesley, or his agent should appoint: and the said Maurice Annesley, or his agent, was thereby required to leave the names of the several and respective tenants of the said lands at the proper office, in order to be inserted in the said injunction and also ordered, that the rents of the said lands remaining in the several tenants' hands from the time the said Hester Sherlock was put in possession, should be forthwith by them paid over to the said Maurice Annesley; and that a copy of the said Order should be served upon the said several tenants of the said lands, together with the said injunction: though by the Order of the House of Lords of Great Britain, the barons were only directed to oblige Hester Sherlock to account before them upon oath, for the rents of the said lands received by her since her gaining the possession thereof; which she was to pay to Maurice Annesley, without prejudice, in case of an appeal.

That pursuant to the said Order of the 4th of February, an injunction issued out of the said Court, signed Jeff. Gilbert; bearing test the 12th February last, directed to Hester Sherlock, and 21 persons as tenants to the said lands. That the said Hester Sherlock was

VOL. XV.

That upon an affidavit made by Richard Lyons, in a cause of Annesley vers. Sherlock, sworn before Mr. Baron St. Leger, the 23rd of February last; and upon motion of the said Beauman, an attachment to the pursuivant was the same day ordered by the said Court, against said Dennis Galvin, for not obeying the said injunction, though no such person was named in the said writ of injunction.

The said lords committees had also the oath administered to the barons of the Exchequer, laid before them by Mr. Hartley Hutchinson, deputy clerk of the crown in the high court of Chancery, and is as follows; viz.

"Ye shall swear, that well and truly ye shall serve the king in the office of baron of his Exchequer; and that truly ye shall charge and discharge all manner of people; as well the poor as rich, and that for highness nor for riches, nor for hatred, nor for the estate of no manner of person or persons, nor for any good deed, gift nor promise of any person the which is made to you, nor by craft nor by engine, ye shall let the king's right, nor none other person's right ye shall disturb, let nor respitt against the laws of the land, nor the king's debts ye shall put in respitt where that they may goodly be levied, and that the king's needs ye shall speed before all other, and that for gift, wages, no good deed ye shall layne, disturb nor let the profit and reasonable advantage of the king, in the advantage of any other person nor of yourself: and that nothing ye shall take of any person for to do wrong or right or delay, or for to deliver or to delay the people which that have to do afore you; but as hastily as ye may them goodly to deliver without hurt of the king, and having no regard to any profit, that might thereof to you be therein, you shall make to be delivered: and whereas ye may know any wrong or prejudice to be done to the king, ye shall put and do all your power and diligence that to redress, and if ye may not do it, ye shall tell it to the king, or to them of his council, which may make relation to the king if ye may not come to him, to the king's majesty's lieutenant, or other chief governor or governors of this realm for the time being, and the king's council ye shall keep and layne in all things, as God' you help, and by the contents of this book."

The committee humbly take leave to observe to your lordships, that there is no name of any attorney to the first injunction.

Which said Report being read, the House agreed to the same, and came to the following

Resolutions:

Resolved on the question, That Alexander Burrowes, esq. late high-sheriff of the county of Kildare, has fully proved the allegations 4 P

« ForrigeFortsæt »