Views of, on faith, 137. ASSURANCE, Doctrine of- Views of Reformers on, 111.
Personal experience of Reformers as to, 113.
Views of Romanists as to, 114.
Extreme opinions of Reformers as to, 115-117.
Grounds of conviction as to a man's personal, 118, 119. Exaggerated statements of Luther and Calvin on personal, 119-121. Misstatement by Sir William Hamil- ton as to doctrine of the Church of England on, 128-134.
Mistakes by Sir William Hamilton as to history of the doctrine of, 135, et seq.
The doctrine of, not the fundament- al principle of the Reformation,
Deliverance of the Council of Trent
Views of Bellarmine on, 144, 145. Practical duty of Christians as to, 147, 148.
Views of Calvin on extent of, 395, et seq.
Views of Beza on extent of, 395. Evidence that Calvin did not hold the doctrine of universal, 398, et seq.
Doctrine of the "Shorter Catechism" on, 242, et seq.
Adult Baptism the fundamental type
Reformed confessions contemplate the case of adult, in their definition of sacraments, 247, 248. Halley on the subjects of, 269. Relation between baptism and spiri- tual blessings, 271. Scriptural positions as to infant, 290. VOL. I.
Conduct of, when banished from Geneva, as to ministers left behind, 306, et seq.
Evidence of strong affection and for- bearance on the part of, from his letters, 313, 314.
Share of, in the death of Servetus, 314, et seq.
Considerations to be kept in view in judging of his conduct in the mat- ter, 318-321.
Charges and misrepresentations of Mr Wallace against, 321, et seq. Unfavourable and unfair view by Dr Tulloch of the conduct of, 327, et seq.
Refutation of charges by Dr Tulloch
against, 329, et seq. Unfounded allegation of presump-
tuous speculation in divine things brought against, 333, et seq. Substance of the Reformation aimed at by, 335.
The grand heresy of the mediæval
and Romish religions that was op- posed by, 337, et seq.
Views of, as to the unlawfulness of human appointments in the worship and government of the church, 342-344.
Views of, on Sublapsarians and Sup- ralapsarians, 364-366.
Views of, on the imputation of Adam's sin, 371, et seq., 379.
Views of, on the extent of the Atone-
Evidence that the doctrine of Univer-
sal Atonement was not held by, 398, et seq.
Views of, on Justification, 402, et seq. Opinion of, on Free Will, 486-488.
Concessions by Dr Whately to, 414, 454, 463.
Denial by Dr Whately that he holds the doctrine of, 415.
Views of Faber on, 419, et seq. Status quæstionis between, and Armi- nianism, 420. Baro on, 426. Arminius on, 426. Plaifere on, 427. Mozley on, 429, 430.
Westminster Confession on, 431. Questions discussed by divines under the head of, 432.
Synod of Dort on, 435.
Conclusions as to what is, and what Arminianism, 449.
Rules as to the application of the de- signations of, and Arminianism, 450-452.
Difficulties of, and replies to them,
Predestination in the system of, not to be identified with Philosophical Necessity, 508, et seq.
Essay on the practical application of,
The doctrines of, alone give the pro- per place to the work of Christ, and the agency of the Spirit, 528,
The doctrines of, opposed to the ten- dencies and feelings of unrenewed man, 529.
Evidence for, founded upon Scripture statements, and not consequences, 529, 530.
The objections to, the same as those referred to by Paul, 530, 531. Connection between Election and Reprobation in the System of, 532, et seq.
Unfair use made by Arminians of the connection between Election and Reprobation in the System of, 532, et seq.
Unfair procedure by Arminians in the synod of Dort in arguing against, 538, 539.
Unfair attack upon, by Hoard, 539,
Reply to Hoard's attack upon, by Davenant, 541, et seq. Unfairness of John Wesley in his attack on, 546, 554, 559. Substance of what its intelligent ad- herents believe on the subject of,
Leading objections brought against the doctrines of, 549. General misrepresentation by Ar- minians of the doctrines of, 551. The means and the end equally fore- ordained according to the system of, 552, et seq.
Misrepresentation of the argument
on, by Richard Watson, 559-565. Chalmers on the foreordination of means and ends in the system of,
Whately on the foreordination of means and ends in the system of,
Unfounded allegation by Whately
that the doctrines of, have no prac- tical influence, 566, et seq. Rules to be observed in the discussion
of the practical application of, 570. Substance of what is to be believed
as to the personal application of the doctrines of, 573, 574, et seq. Westminster Confession on the prac- tical application of the doctrines of, 578, et seq.
Unfounded allegation by Whately that the 17th Article of the Church of England denies any practical application of the doctrine of Elec- tion in the system of, 581, et seq. Remarks on the 17th Article of the Church of England in connection with, 591, et seq.
Distinctions as to the "Will of God"
in the system of, 595. Conditional character of prophecy not asserted, but denied, by intel- ligent defenders of, 596.
Practical effects of the discussions on the doctrines of, 597, 598. Four branches into which a full dis- cussion of the doctrines of, would divide itself, 599.
Attack on, by Sir William Hamilton, as to Philosophical Necessity, 471, 472, 476, 477.
Views of, on Philosophical Necessity, 472, 476, 477, 478, 481, 483, 488, 490, 492, 495, 508, 513, 516. Views of, as to the foreordination of means and ends in the system of Calvinism, 559-561.
Doctrine of Calvin on Organisation of, 27, 28.
Different opinions as to what Scripture teaches on the Organization of, 29. Dr Tulloch's views as to the teaching
of Scripture on the Organisation of the Church, 29, 30. Two views generally held by Refor- mers on the Organisation of, offen- sive to Latitudinarians, 31.
The Calvinistic Reformers held that nothing was lawful in, without Scripture warrant, 32. Scripture evidence for this truth, 33. Human inventions in, injurious, 34. Importance of this principle, 35. Practical effect of this principle in shutting out superstitious rites and ceremonies, 36, 37.
Jus divinum of a particular form of government in, 37.
Fundamental principles revealed, but not details of government of, 38. A priori reasonings unsatisfactory for a jus divinum of government in, 40. Scripture principle and apostolic practice furnish evidence for a par- ticular form of government in, 41. Reasons against a jus divinum by Dr Tulloch, 42.
Claim to a jus divinum not unreason- able or intolerant, 43, 44. In some sense the representative of Christ upon earth, 54.
Perversion of this doctrine by papists, 54. Tendency of this doctrine to lead to persecution on the part of Romanists, 55.
Views of Calvin as to the unlawful- ness of human appointments in the worship and government of, 342, 344. CHURCH OF ENGLAND-
Mis-statement by Sir William Hamil- ton as to Doctrine of, on Assurance, 128, 134.
Doctrinal Sense of the Articles of, 164, 167.
Calvinism of the early divines of, 168,
CHURCH OF ENGLAND- Waterland on the Calvinism of, 171, 172.
Hill on the Calvinism of, 173. Kippling on the Calvinism of 174. Lawrence on the Calvinism of, 175. Tomline on the Calvinism of, 175, 422. Goode on the Calvinism of, 176, 177. Wilberforce on the Calvinism of, 177, 178.
Calvinism of the 17th Article of, 193, 195.
Perversion by Tomline of the 17th Article of, 195. Misinterpretation by Lawrence of the 17th Article of, 196, 197. Comparison between the 17th Article of, and Melancthon's places, 198.
Fallacy of the reasons for denying the Calvinism of the Articles of, 203- 206.
Defective and indefinite views of the Evangelical Clergy of, 208, 209. Magee on the Calvinism of, 422. Bode on the Calvinism of, 424. Burnet on the Calvinism of, 428. Browne on the Calvinism of, 429. CHURCH OF ROME-
Pelagian Views in, before the Refor- mation, 183-185.
Alleged Calvinism in, before the Reformation, 187, 188.
Doctrine of, on the Sacraments, 233, 234.
Views of, on the Imputation of Adam's sin, 377, 378.
Views of Reformed, on Saving Faith, 124, 125.
His attack on the character of the Reformers, 60.
His attacks upon Luther, 74-76. His charge against Luther, as claim- ing personal infallibility, 77. Reply to the charge, 77, 78. Character of, as a controversialist, 79.
His extracts from the writings of Luther, borrowed from Bossuet, 80, 81.
Incorrectness of his extracts from Luther, 81-83.
Assaults by, on Archdeacon Hare, 85, 86.
His unfairness in dealing with Luther's consent to the marriage of the Land- grave of Hesse, 92.
His charge against Luther, of preach- ing immorality, 99.
His statements as to views of Re- formers on Assurance, 111, 112. Mis-statements by, as to views of the Reformers on faith, 126, 127. Mis-statement by, of the Doctrine of the Church of England on Assur- ance, 128, 134. Mistakes by, as to history of the Doc- trine of Assurance, 135, et seq. Misrepresentation by, of the Doctrine of the Reformation as to Justitica- tion, 146.
His views on Philosophical Necessity, 471-473.
Attack by, on Dr Chalmers as to Philosophical Necessity, 471, 472, 476-477.
The Doctrine of Philosophical Neces- sity untruly alleged by, to be op- posed to Calvinism, 482. HARE, ARCHDEACON-
Vindication of Luther by, 61. Qualifications of, as a defender of Luther, 62, 63.
His character of Moehler's "Sym- bolism," 70, 71.
Assaults upon, by Sir Wm. Hamilton, 85, 86.
His views of Luther's consent to the marriage of the Landgrave of Hesse, 93-95.
Remarks upon Hare's vindication of Luther in this matter, 96-98. His remarks on Hamilton's charge against Luther of preaching im- morality, 99.
Views of Calvin on, 371, et seq. Differences of opinion among those who have denied, 375. Views of Beza on, 376.
Views of Placæus on, 379, et seq. Views of Westminster Confession on, 382, 383.
Views of Jonathan Edwards on, 384. Views of Chalmers on, 384. Views of Rogers on, 385, et seq. Views of Scripture on, 390, et seq. Argument by Dr Hodge on, 394.
Dr Tulloch's statement of Luther's view of, 23.
Westminster Confession on, 24, 405. Dr Tulloch holds that Scripture teaches no definite doctrine on,
Exposition of the doctrine of, by
Misrepresentation by Sir William Hamilton of the doctrine of the Reformation as to, 146. Views of Melancthon on, 163. Views of Calvin on, 402, et seq.
Dr Tulloch's statement of his doc- trine of Justification, 23.
His discussion with Erasmus on the bondage of the will, 25. Dr Tulloch's sketch of, 50. Criticism upon Dr Tulloch's sketch of, 51, 52.
Vindication of, by Archdeacon Hare,
Services rendered by, to Church, 64. Defects of the character of, 65. Defence of, as not being a Father of the Church, but the founder of a school, 66.
Assaults upon, by Mr Ward, 67. Attack upon, by Mr Hallam, 67, 68.
Worst and most offensive passage in the writings of, 71, 72. Explanation and defence of this pas- sage, 72, 73.
Attacks upon, by Sir Wm. Hamilton, 74-76.
Charged by Sir Wm. Hamilton with
claiming Personal Infallibility, 77; Reply to the charge, 77, 78. Extracts from writings of, by Sir Wm. Hamilton, borrowed from Bossuet, 80, 81; incorrectness of these extracts, 81-83.
Rash and exaggerated expressions in the writings of, 83, 84.
Consent of, to the marriage of the Landgrave of Hesse to a second wife while his first was alive, 89, 90.
His conduct in the matter not ap- proved by Protestants, 91. Unfairness of Sir Wm. Hamilton in dealing with it, 92.
Hare's view of his conduct, 93-95. Remarks upon Hare's view, 96-98. Charge by Sir William against, for preaching Immorality, 99.
Remarks by Hare on this charge, 99. Claims of, as a man, upon our es- teem, 100.
Claims of, on our gratitude for his services to the Church, 101, 102. Exposition by, of the doctrine of Justification, 102-104.
Views of, on the Romish rites and ceremonies, 104, 105. Exaggerated statements by, on the law of God, 105, 106.
Error of, in regard to the Lord's Sup- per, 106, 107.
Changes in the opinions of, 107, 108. The Calvinistic principles of, 108-
Exaggerated statements of Calvin and, on personal assurance, 119–
Services of, in bringing out the true doctrine of Justification, 337.
« ForrigeFortsæt » |