Laurence, Richard, Abp. of
Cashel, 390.
Laurence, S., 498, 499.
Law, William, 342, 391.
Le Brun, M., 166, 167.

Leo the Great, S., 60, 186, 513,
514.

Lepin, Dr., 16, 78, 146, 332,
363, 454.

Leslie, Charles, 382, 383.
Lessius, 212.

Letter, of Dr. Pusey to Rev.
B. Harrison, 415; to Bp.
Wilberforce, 415-417; of
Bp. Westcott to Rev. Dr.
Mortimer, first, 551; second,
552; of Rev. F. E. Brightman
to Dr. Mortimer, 553; of
Dr. Mortimer to Rev. Dr.
Schanz, 556; of Dr. Schanz
to Dr. Mortimer, 557 ; of Dr.
Mortimer to Rev. Dr. Lepin,
first, 560; second, 571; third,
578; of Dr. Lepin to Dr.
Mortimer, first, 563; second,
574; third, 581.

Liddon, Canon, 415, 417, 433,
435, 448, 449.

L'Idée du Sacrifice, by Dr.
Lepin, 16.
Lightfoot, Bp., 162.
Liguori, S., 212.
Liturgies, quoted by Bright-
man in support of Modern
view, 109; witness to Eu-
charistic Sacrifice, 148; Ro-
man, Scotch, Anglican, and
American, quoted by Bright-
man, 150-152; significance
of passages must be determ-
ined by the Fathers, 156.
Liturgy, the, attempt in cent-
ury IX. to find image of
the Passion in, 191; exposi-
tion of by Bp. Amalarius,
192-196; exposition written
by Bp. Nicholas Cabasilas in
century XIV., 216; mystical
works on, in century XII. :
by S. Ivo of Chartres, 269;

treatment of in his sermon
Opusculum, 286-307;
B. Odo of Cambrai, 269, 279-
285; V. Hildebert of le Mans
(or Tours), 269, 286, 303, 307-
309; V. Peter of Cluny, 269;
Algerus of Liége, 269, 310-
316; Hugo of S. Victor, 269,
309, 310; Guitmundus Aver-
sanus, 269, 278, 279.
Luther, Martin, 205.

M.

Macarius of Egypt, S., 500.
Macarius, Bp. of Vinnitza, 217,
337, 338, 452.

Mackay, Rev. D. J., 434.
Man, as an individual and as a
society, must worship GOD,
28.
Mansi, G. D., 306.
Marcion, 12.
Martyrdom,

illustration of
sacrificial act, 40; differ-
ence between it and sacri-
fice examined, 65-68.
Mary, B. V., 417.

Mason, Dr., 19, 95, 96.
Mason, Francis, Archdeacon
of Norfolk, 369.
Massarello, 210.

Mede, Joseph, 342, 354-356,
397.

Melanchthon, P., 208.

Melchior Canus, 78, 207, 210,

211.

Methodius, S., 233.
Meyer, Dr., 108, 122.
Meyrick, Canon, 346.
Milligan, Dr., 5-10, 12, 20, 59,
97, 108, 109, 215, 328, 396,
407-409, 459, 491, 522, 531.
Ministerial Priesthood, by
Dr. Moberly, 18.
Moberly, Dr., 18, 515, 524, 534.
Modern view, term used in this
book, 82; principal accre-
tion, stated by Alford, 96, 97;
words of Institution, 1 Cor.

Modern view-Continued.
xi. 26, interpreted by Bright-
man in support of, 108-110;
several theories in regard to
Sacrifice of Cross, 112, 113;
Rev. v. 6, 140, 141; Thalhof-
er's argument on this verse,
142-145; no basis for, found
in any commentary, nor in
any of the Fathers, on He-
brews, before century XVI.,
147; question as to whether
the liturgies support this
view, 148; true and valuable
element in, 153, 174; result
of examination of Thalhof-
er's authorities, 260; only
passages in support of this
view considered in Chapter
IX., 270; no support found
in Mediæval writers, 316;
re-statement of characteris-
tics, 318-321; finds no sup-
port in Thomassin, 328; no
notice of, in Eastern Church,
nor among any writers of
the Middle Ages, nor of
century XVII., 338; Bright-
man claims that Anglican
divines held this view, 340;
writers who favour this view
in Tract 81 by Dr. Pusey,
342-362.

Mogila, Peter, 216.
Montague, Richard, Bp. of
Norwich, 370, 371.
Mortimer, Rev. Dr., Letters,
551-581.

Morton, Thomas, Bp. of Dur-
ham, 355, 367.
Moule, Dr., 538.

N.

Nelson, Robert, 383, 384.
Newbolt, Canon, 538.
Newman, Rev. J. H., 96, 414.
New Testament, passages
which refer man's redemp-
tion to the Cross, 69-71;

recognizes only one absolute
Sacrifice, 145; passages as to
use of the word "heaven-
ly," 162-164.
Nicholson, Bp., 342.

O.

Odo of Cambrai, B., 167, 196,
269, 279-285.
Ecumenius, 120, 202.
Olier, Jean Jacques, 270, 317,
318, 329-332.

One Offering, The, by Sadler,
18, 546.

Optatus, S., 499.
Opusculum, sermon by S.
Ivo of Chartres: his treat-
ment of the liturgy, 286-
307; no support found for
Modern view, 299; teaching
of S. Ivo summed up, 307.
Opusc. de Ven. Sac. Alta-
ris," ascribed to S. Thomas
Aquinas, 208; author and
source cannot be determ-
ined, 209.

Oratory, the, founded by Card.
de Berulle, 316.

Origen cited by Thalhofer,
235-246.

Overall, John, Bp. of Norwich,
215.

Overall (Pseudo-), 342-345, 393,

395-397, 400-402, 407, 445,
447, 448, 452, 453.
Oxford Conference, Dec. 13
and 14, 1899; report of, 515-
532; Eucharistic Sacrifice
incidentally touched upon,
516; conclusion to be drawn
from, 534.

Passion, the-Continued.

155; remembrance of, a force
in our lives, 471.
Patrick, Simon, Bp. of Ely,
377, 378.

Paulus, Dr., 209.
Pearson, Bp., 63.
Perpetua, S., 416.

Perrone, Rev. J., S. J., 78.
Petavius, 63, 103.

Peter of Cluny, V., 196, 197,
269.

Peter Damian, S., 62, 179.
Peter Lombard, S., 194, 196-
198, 202, 364, 375.
Peter of Prussia, 309.
Philastrius, 158.
Philo Judæus, 36.

Philpotts, 342, 353, 393-395,

Plautus, 474.

Plutarch, 475.

Polycarp, S., 233.
Potter, John, Abp. of Canter-
bury, 389, 390.
Priesthood, High-, Christ's,
ruling thought of Hebrews,
113; as typified by Day of
Atonement, 123-126.
Priesthood, Christ's, on earth,

questioned by Milligan, 7, 8;
theory as to when it began,
by Socinus, 61-63; theo-
logians agree it began at
the Incarnation, 62; theory
of Socinus finds no support
in Scripture, and is contrary
to the teaching of the Catho-
lic Church, 71, 72.
Priesthood, necessity of, in
sacrificial act, 46.
Priests ministers of Christ, 75.
Primary Charge, by Dr.
Forbes, Bp. of Brechin, 435-
439.
Primasius, 120, 162, 232, 265,
268.

Proclus, S., 511, 512.

Propositions in regard to Eu-

charistic Sacrifice contra
fidem, 456, 457; not contra
fidem, 457; explanation of
propositions in their relation
to modern theories, 459-467.
Protestant view of Eucharistic
Sacrifice expressed by Bp.
Burnet, 79, 80.

Puller, Father, S.S. J. E., 403,
515-522, 527, 529-532.
Pulleyne, Robert, 196, 197.
Pusey, Rev. Dr., 74, 96, 340,
345, 395, 415, 419-427, 432,
434, 435, 446.

R.

Rabanus Maurus, 169, 191,

194, 196.

Ratramuus of Corbey, 179, 191,
195.

Reaction exemplified by age
of Councils, and Reforma-
tion, I, 2.

Real Presence, Eucharistic
Sacrifice a consequence of,
75; rejected by Protestants,
82; discussed from century
IX. to XVI., 178, 179; at-
tacked by Berengarius, 196.
Redemption, man's, passages
in New Testament which
refer it to the Cross, 69-71.
Reductio ad absurdum, im-
portance of, 2.

Reductio ad impossibile, 253.
Reformation, theology of, ob-
scures the Incarnation and
our LORD'S Intercession,
154; doctrine of the Atone-
ment made the foundation
of theology at time of, 470.
Reichenau, Bernon de, 196.
Religion, distinguishes man
from other creatures, 24;
demands external worship,
27.

Resurrection, theologian of,
Charles de Condren, 316–
318.

Revelation v. 6, views of Mod-
ern school, 140, 141; Thal-
hofer's argument, 142-145.
Ridley, Gloucester, 391, 392.
Robertson, Dr., 538, 541.
Robinson, Canon, 539.
Ryle, Dr., 515, 522, 523, 527,
532.

S.

Sacrifice, equivocal use of
term, 22, 23; nature of, not
determined before century
XVI., 22; absence of modern
English works on, 23; uni-
versal characteristic of relig-
ion, 24; origin primæval,
24; institution not necessa-
rily divine, 24; meaning pri-
marily love, 25, in mediæval
theology a sense of sin, 25;
purpose of, practical relig-
ion, 27; expresses man's re-
lation to God, 27; demands
external worship, 27; chief
act of public or external
worship, 28; S. Augustine's
definition of the " genus
of, 29; his treatment of,
29-31; S. Thomas' treatment
of, 31, 32; its character and
Authority, 32; God the only
Authority in revealed relig-
ion, 33; demands external
form, 33; propositions in
regard to, by Dr. Schanz, 33,
34; idea of destruction not
essential, shown by Latin,
Greek, and Hebrew terms,
34, 35; S. Irenæus on, 36;
definition of, by Dr. Schanz,
36, 37; S. Augustine, 37-41;
Alexander of Hales, 41; S.
Thomas Aquinas, 41; S. Isi-
dore of Seville, 42, 189, 190;
De Lugo, 42; Vasquez, 42-
44; Gabriel Biel, 43; Al-
phonsus de Castro, 43;
Suarez, 45; Dr. Scheeben,
45; recapitulation of ele-

ments, 46; how the Cross
fulfils definition of, 47; terms
used in Scripture describing
our LORD's Death as a Sacri-
fice, 48,49; elements of, found
in the Cross, 64; New Testa-
ment recognizes only one ab-
solute Sacrifice, 145; defin-
ition of, by William of Au-
vergne, 199; by S. Thomas
Aquinas, which changed
the current of theological
thought, 203, 204; this defi-
nition became true basis of
treatment of Eucharistic
Sacrifice, 203; different sens-
es in which it is used 233.
Sacrifice of Cross, Milligan's
treatment of, 6; only absolute
Sacrifice, 47; five actions cor-
responding to those of Jew-
ish Law, 49-54; every rite
of Jewish Law fulfilled, 54;
our LORD Priest and Victim
in His Human Nature only,
in His Divine Nature He re-
ceives the Sacrifice, 54-56;
Socinus' theory as to its be-
ing a martyrdom discussed,
56-72; man's redemption ac-
complished by it, 68; pas-
sages in New Testament
which refer man's redemp-
tion to the Cross, 69-71;
Catholic Church teaches that
upon the Cross our LORD
offered His perfect Sacrifice,
71; recognized by both Pro-
testants and Catholics as the
only absolute Sacrifice, 80;
Catholic teaching, 112; sev-
eral theories of Modern
school, 112, 113; examina-
tion of passages in Hebrews,
114-126; only absolute Sac-
rifice, as shown by Hebrews
X., 134-136; all the sacrifices
of the Law foreshadowed dif-
erent aspects of, 138, 139;
Scripture offers no support

Sacrifice of Cross-Continued.
for view that it is not a com-
pleted Sacrifice, 146; Thal-
hofer's view orthodox, 231;
his innovation, 231, 232; his
authorities examined, 232-
260.

Sacrifice, Eucharistic, diffi-

culties in treatment of, 21;
many departments of theo-
logy touch on, 23; method
of treating the subject, 73;
three views given by writ-
ers to be traced to cent-
ury XVI., 73; support for
each view, 74; Bossuet on
essence of, 74; CHRIST both
consecrates and offers, 74;
consequence of the Real
Presence, 75; Sacrifice of
Cross renewed in, 75; does
not take away from suffi-
ciency of Sacrifice of Cross
but depends entirely upon
it, 75, 76; Consecration,
essence of, 77; Protestant
view of, as taught by Lu-
ther, and held by most
Protestant bodies, 79, 80;
Protestant view a reaction,
modified in century XVII.,
81; Mede's theory, 81; Dr.
Hickes', 82; Waterland's,
82; name discussed, 82;
term "Anglican view " mis-
leading, 82; term "Modern
view" used in this book,
82; Brightman as expon-
ent of Modern view, 83-88;
his view very like that of
Socinus, 89; difference be-
tween Catholic teaching and
Modern view, 88-92; essen-
tial difference between Cath-
olic and Modern views, 98,
99; Hebrews the battle-
ground of Catholic and Mod-
ern views, 110; sketch of
purpose and argument of
Hebrews, 111, 112; sum-

mary of Scripture teaching,
145; witness of liturgies,
148; no attempt to define it
until century XVI., 178,
179; celebration of, re-
stricted to bishops and
priests, 180; treatment dur-
ing middle period of the
Church, 188; efficacy of, for
souls in Purgatory taught by
S. Gregory the Great, 189;
frequency of, limited in
century VI., increased cent-
ury IX., 190; consecration
of species, strange theory,
198; definition of, by Wil-
líam of Auvergne, 199; by
Albert the Great, 199-201;
S. Thomas' definition of,
became basis of treatment
of, 203; view taken by Duns
Scotus directly opposed to
that of S. Thomas, 204; the-
ory popularly held in cent-
ury XVI., 206; attributed
to Catharinus, 206; he was
not its author, 207; divers-
ity of opinion at Council of
Trent, 209, 210; in centuries
XVI. and XVII., theolog-
ians who treated of this fall
into three groups, 210; has
received little attention in
England since Reformation,
214; question as to whether
the Fathers relate it to Sac-
rifice of Cross, 219; witness
to Catholic view of, by
Greek Fathers, 220: S.
Irenæus, 220; S. Cyril of
Jerusalem, 220; S. Greg-
ory of Nyssa, 221, 224;
S. Cyril of Alexandria, 221,
222; S. Chrysostom, 222-
224; Thomassin, 223, 224;
witness to Catholic view of,
by Latin Fathers, 224: S.
Cyprian, 224; S. Ambrose,
224, 225; S. Augustine, 225-
227; Algerus of Liége, 227;