Clement of Rome, S., 77, 177,

180.

Clementine liturgy, 165.
Clichtovée, 205.

Cochlæus, Johu, 208.
Coleridge, 433.
Collier, Bp., 342.

Comber, Thomas, Dean of
Durham, 381, 382.
Condren, Charles de, 213, 270,

316, 317, 324, 329, 330, 332.
Conference at Fulham (Round
table), Oct. 10, 1900; its con-
stitution, 535; subject, 536;
Canon Gore's interpretation
of S. Irenæus, 543; Dr.
Wace and Robertson con-
nect Eucharist with the
Passover, 544; no one at
this Conference refers Eu-
charist to our LORD'S Medi-
atorial work, 545.
Conference at Oxford, Dec. 13,

14, 1899: report of, 515-532;
Eucharistic Sacrifice inci-
dentally touched upon, 516;
conclusion to be drawn
from, 534.

Consecration, the, essence of
Eucharistic Sacrifice, 77.
Considerations, by Rev.
John Keble, 431, 434, 452.
Contarini, Card., 211.
Cornelius à Lapide, 159.
Corrionero, Bp. of Almeria,

210.

Cosin, John, Bp. of Durham,

345, 372, 373.
Council of Nicæa, 499.
Council of Trent, diversity of
opinion in regard to Euch-
aristic Sacrifice, 209, 210;
stated that the Eucharist
was a Sacrifice, 210; does
not define mode, 210.
Cyprian, S., 115, 184, 185, 224,

364, 369, 371, 497, 498.
Cyril of Alexandria, S., 19,
158, 187, 221, 222, 230, 233,
263, 510, 511.

Cyril of Jerusalem, S., 220,
499.

D.

Damascus, John of, S., 11, 202,
264, 333.

Daubeny, Charles, 392.
Davidson, Rev. A. B., 519.
Davison, Dr., 515, 529, 531,533.
Day of Atonement, typifies
CHRIST'S High-Priesthood,
123-126; typifies our LORD'S
Intercession, 139.

De Castro, Alphonsus, 43, 205,

211.

De Expositione Missa, by

Florus, most important cou-
tribution of century IX., 195.
Definition, of the "genus" of
Sacrifice by S. Augustine,
29; of "heavenly" by S.
Chrysostom, 132, 160; of
Sacrifice, Dr. Schanz, 36,
37; by S. Augustine, 37-41;
Alexander of Hales, 41; S.
Thomas Aquinas, 41; S.
Isidore of Seville, 42, 189,
190; Vasquez, 42-44; Ga-
briel Biel, 43; Alphonsus
de Castro, 43; Suarez, 45;
Dr. Scheeben, 45; Wil-
liam of Auvergne, 199; S.
Thomas Aquinas, which
changed the current of theo-
logical thought, 203, 204.
Delitzsch, Dr., 54.

De Lugo, Card., 42, 78, 204,

212-214.

De Sacramentis Corporis,
by Algerus of Liége, 310-
315; only heavenly Sacri-
fice known to Algerus the
Eucharistic Sacrifice, 312.
De Sacrificio Missæ, by Al-
gerus of Liége, 314.

De Sacrificio Missa, by Bene-
dict XIV., 331.
Destruction of Victim, not an

essential idea of Sacrifice
shown by Latin, Greek, and

Dest'n of Victim-Continued.
Hebrew terms, 34, 35; in
Eucharistic Sacrifice only
mystical, 76, 77; Roman
schools, 77-79; view of, by
S. Thomas Aquinas, 77;
Vasquez, 77; Perrone, 78;
De Lugo, 78; Salmeron, 78;
Bossuet, 78; Melchior Ca-
nus, 78; Card. Bellarmine,
78; Suarez, 78; Card. Fran-
zelin, 78; Dr. Scheeben,
78; Dr. Schanz, 78; Dr. Le-
pin, 78; Tyrrell, 78; not a
necessary element of Catho-
lic view, 79.
"Didache," the, 181.
Dimock, Rev. N., 537, 540.
Dionysius the Areopagite, S.,

its of the Cross applied in,
76; asserted to be no Sac-
rifice by Protestants, S2;
difference between Catholic
teaching and Modern view
held by Brightman, 88-92;
sense in which some Rom-
ans have taught that it is
an absolute Sacrifice, 90;
Dr. Scheeben's view of, as
a relative Sacrifice, 90; in
Institution, Brightman sees
no special reference to our
LORD'S Death, 91; peculiar
view of our LORD'S Presence
by Dr. Mason, 95, 96; ex-
amination as to whether it
can be proved from Script-
ure to be a Sacrifice, 100-
106; examination as to
whether its sacrificial char-
acter depends on its rela-
tion to the Cross, or to our
LORD'S work in heaven, 100,
106-109; witness of Old Tes-
tament to its being a Sac-
rifice, 101-103; evidence of
New Testament to its being
a Sacrifice, 103-106; con-
clusion as to the fact that
it is a Sacrifice, 106; testi-
mony of Scripture as to the
manner in which it is a Sac-
rifice, 106; Catholic teach-
ing, 106, 107; difference be-
tween Catholic and Mod-
ern view; same passages of
Scripture quoted on each
side, 107; typified by the
Passion, 139; Old and New
Testaments both prove it to
be a Sacrifice, 145; a relative
Sacrifice in which we make
a memorial of our LORD'S
Death, 145; a Sacrifice be-
cause essentially identical
with Sacrifice of Cross, 146;
accidentally related to our
LORD'S Mediatorial work,
146; extension of Incarna-

Eucharist-Continued.
tion, 151; treatment in three
periods of Church history,
177, 178; the Church's Sacri-
fice, 180; best writer in cent-
ury XII. Algerus of Liége,
197; Luther denied sacrifi-
cial character of, 205; de-
fined as a Sacrifice by Coun-
cil of Trent, 210; mode not
defined, 210; accidental re-
lation between it and our
LORD'S Mediatorial work
shown by Gallican theolo-
gians, in century XVII., 213;
strange theory suggested
by Cienfuegos, century
XVIII., 214; Bp. Macarius
teaches that it is a Sacri-
fice, 337, 338; three points
established by our investi-
gations, 450; summary of
their result, 450; witness
of Scripture, 450; of litur-
gies, 450, 451; of the Fa-
thers, 451; of mediæval
writers, 451; of Anglican
divines, 451, 452; of Tract-
arian writers, 452; catena
of passages from the Fa-
thers bearing witness to the
fact of its being a Sacrifice,
495-514; at Fulham Confer-
ence, Oct. 10, 1900, Canon
Gore's interpretation of S.
Irenæus given, 543; Drs.
Wace and Robertson con-
nect the Sacrifice with the
Passover, 544; no one at
the Conference refers it to
Our LORD'S Mediatorial
work, 545.
Eucharistic Adoration, by
Rev. John Keble, 419, 430,
431.
Eusebius of Cæsarea, 187,
263, 264.
Euthymius Zigadenus, 120,
128, 135, 147, 175, 179, 202,
262, 265, 268, 451, 457.

Ewald, Dr., 108.

F.

Fairbairn, Dr., 515, 528, 529,
533.
Fathers, the, neglect of, by
Milligan, 5; summary of
passages from, in support
of Catholic view of words
of Institution, 228; teaching
as to our LORD'S Interces-
sion in heaven, by Greek
Fathers: S. Chrysostom,
261, 262; Theodoret, 261;
Euthymius Zigadenus, 262,
265; S. Cyril of Alexandria,
263; Eusebius of Cæsarea,
263, 264; S. John of Damas-
cus, 264; by Latin Fathers:
Primasius, 265; S. Augus-
tine, 265, 266; S. Gregory
the Great, 266, 267; sum-
mary of Patristic testimony,
267; catena of passages
bearing witness to the fact
that the Eucharist is a Sac-
rifice, 495-514.
Felicitas, S., 416.

Fell, John, Bp. of Oxford, 342,
360, 361, 396.
Ferdinand I., 398.

Ferne, Henry, Bp. of Chester,
375.

Ferry, M., 74.

Field, Richard, Dean of

Gloucester, 365, 366, 403.
Florus, 166, 191, 194-196, 198.
Forbes, A. P., Bp. of Brechin,
93, 94, 96, 112, 113, 145, 419,
427, 433, 435, 439, 448, 464.
Forbes, William, Bp. of Edin-
burgh, 342, 371, 397.
Forsyth, Dr., 515.
Franz, Dr., 215.

Franzelin, Card., 42, 78, 104,
105, 213, 214.

French school, Lepin, 16, Va-
cant, 17.

Fulham Conference (Roman

Fulham Conf.-Continued.
table), Oct. 10, 1900: its
constitution, 535; subject,
536; Canon Gore's interpre-
tation of S. Irenæus, 543;
Drs. Wace and Robertson
connect Eucharist with the
Passover, 544; no one at
this Conference refers Eu-
charist to our LORD'S Media-
torial work, 545.

G.

Gallican writers in century
XVII. Charles de Condren,
270, 316, 317, 324, 329, 330,
332; Jean Jacques Olier,
270, 317, 318, 329-332; Card.
de Berulle, 316, 317; Card.
du Perron, 316; Thomassin,
317, 318, 320, 321-328, 331.
Gaudentius, S., 506, 507.
Genebradus, 243.
"Genus" of Sacrifice, defini-

tion of, by S. Augustine, 29.
German schools, three, 15, 231.
Gibson, Rev. E. C. S., 94, 95.
Glyn, Bp. of Bangor, 402.
GOD the only Authority for
Sacrifice, in revealed relig-
ion, 33.
Godet, Dr., 12, 108, 109.
Gore, Canon, 515, 525, 526,

533, 539-541.
Grabe, John Ernest, 342, 386,
387, 395.
Grancolas, M. J., 166.

Greek sacrificial terms, 475,
477.

Gregory the Great, S., 178,

180, 188, 189, 228, 230, 248,
249, 259, 266-268, 323, 418,
469, 514.

Gregory Nazianzen, S., 198,
424

Gregory of Nyssa, S., 187, 221,

224, 500.

Grotius, Hugo, 497, 409-412.

Guitmundus Aversanus, 269,
277-279.

H.

Haldane, Dr. A. Chinnery, Bp.
of Argyle, 434.

Halifax, Lord, 537, 540, 542.
Hall, Joseph, Bp. of Norwich,
370.

Hammond, Henry, 165, 168,
342, 356, 357.
Harrison, Rev. B., 415.

Haywood (Pseudo - Overall),
345, 346, 402.

Headlam, Rev. A. C., 515, 528,
533.

Heath, Abp. of York, 402.
Heavenly altar, Thalhofer's
argument considered; ex-
amination of Isa. vi. 6, and
Rev. viii. 3, quoted by
Thalhofer, 157-159; taken
for our LORD Himself, 160;
often spoken of by the
Fathers, 162; discussion of,
summed up, 173, 174; fre-
quently spoken of by medi-
æval writers, from which
Thalhofer infers heavenly
Sacrifice, 270; his authorities
examined, 270-286, 307-316;
views of Charles de Condren,
329, 330; Jean Jacques Olier,
330, 331; Bossuet, 331, 332;
referred to by Dr. Pusey,
424.

"Heavenly," defined by S.
Chrysostom, 160; passages
in the New Testament as to
the use of the word, 162-164.
Hebrews, Modern interpreta-
tion of, 12; battle-ground of
Catholic and Modern views,
110; sketch of purpose and
argument of, 111, 112; ruling
thought, CHRIST'S High-
Priesthood, 113; examina-
tion of passages bearing on
Sacrifice of Cross, 114-119,

Hebrews--Continued.

122-126; examination of, as
to our LORD's work, as typi-
fied by Day of Atonement,
126-134; chap. xii., 24, by
Bengel and Alford, 136, 137;
in no Catholic commentary
nor before century XVI. nor
in any of the Fathers, are
found any traces of Modern
view, 147.

Hebrew sacrificial terms, 478,
479.

Hefele, Bp., 190.
Hermas, 233.
Herodotus, 475.

Hickes, Dr. George, Titular

Bp. of Thetford, 82, 379, 381,
448.

Hildebert of le Mans (or

Tours), 196, 269, 286, 303,
307-309.
Hippolytus, S., 496.
Histoire de la Conception,

by Dr. Vacant, 17.
Hofmann, Dr., 108.

Holland, Canon Scott, 515,