therefore, in the same way a word which conveys a prohibition under the divine law. By constant juxtaposition with ius, fas came in course of time to take on the character of a substantive, and so too did its opposite nefas. The dictionaries supply many examples of its use as a substantive and as paralleled with ius, but the only one I can find that is earlier than Cicero is Terence, Hecyra, iii. 3. 27, i.e. in the work of a non-Roman. I cannot find that it is so used by Varro, where we might naturally have expected it. Cicero does not call his imaginary ius divinum a fas, but iura religionum, constitutio religionum (de Legibus ii. 10-23, 17-32). Ius is the word always used technically of particular departments of the religious law, e.g. ius pontificium, ius augurale, and ius fetiale (CIL. i. p. 202, is preimus ius fetiale paravit). The notion that fas could mean a kind of code of religious law is probably due to Virgil's use of the word in "Quippe etiam festis quaeddam exercere diebus Fas et iura sinunt," Georg. i. 269, and to the comment of Servius, "id est, divina humanaque iura permittunt: nam ad religionem fas, ad homines iura pertinent." It is strange to find it personified as a kind of deity in the formula of the fetiales, used when they announced the Roman demands at an enemy's frontier (Livy i. 32): "Audi Iuppiter, inquit, audite Fines (cuiuscunque gentis sunt nominat), audiat Fas." Whence did Livy get this formula? We have no record of a book of the fetiales; if this came from those of the pontifices, as is probable, the formula need not be of ancient date, and the personification of Fines also suggests a doubt as to the genuineness of the whole formula. APPENDIX V THE WORSHIP OF SACRED UTENSILS (page 436) THERE can be no doubt that some kind of worship was paid by the Arval Brethren to certain ollae, or primitive vessels of sunbaked clay used in their most ancient rites. This is attested by two inscriptions of different ages which are printed on pp. 26 and 27 of Henzen's Acta Fratrum Arvalium. After leaving their grove and entering the temple "in mensa sacrum fecerunt ollis"; and shortly afterwards, "in aedem intraverunt et ollas precati sunt." Then, to our astonishment, we read that the door of the temple was opened, and the ollae thrown down the slope in front of it. This last act seems inexplicable; but the worship finds a singular parallel in the dairy ritual of the Todas of the Nilghiri hills. Dr. Rivers, in his work on the Todas (Macmillan, 1906, p. 453), in summing up his impressions of their worship, observes that "the attitude of worship which is undoubtedly present in the Toda mind is becoming transferred from the gods themselves to the material objects used in the service of the gods." "The religious attitude of worship is being transferred from the gods themselves to the objects round which centres the ritual of the dairy." These objects are mainly the bells of the buffaloes and the dairy vessels; and an explicit account of them, the reverence in which they are held, and the prayers in which they are mentioned, will be found in the fifth, sixth, and eighth chapters of Dr. Rivers' work, which, as an account of what seems to be a religion atrophied by over-development of ritual, is in many ways of great interest to the student of Roman religious experience. The following sentence will appeal to the readers of these Lectures :— "The Todas seem to show us how the over-development of the ritual aspect of religion may lead to atrophy of those ideas and beliefs through which the religion has been built up; and then how, in its turn, the ritual may suffer, and acts which are performed mechanically, with no living ideas behind them, may come to be performed carelessly and incompletely, while religious observances which involve trouble and discomfort may be evaded or completely neglected." Whether the worship of the ollae was a part of the original ritual of the Brethren, or grew up after its revival by Augustus, it is impossible to determine. But if we can allow the dairy ritual of the Todas to help us in the matter, we may conclude that in any case it was not really primitive, and that it was a result of that process of over-ritualisation to which must also be ascribed the piacula caused by the growth of a fig-tree on the roof of the temple, and the three Sondergötter Adolenda Commolenda Deferunda. (See above p. 161 foll., and Henzen, Acta Fratr. Arv. p. 147.) Aemilius Paulus, 340, 362, 433 as a means of understanding the Aesculapius, 260 Ara, meaning of, 146 Ara Maxima in the Forum Boarium, 29, 230 : Ara Pacis of Augustus, 177, 437. 448 Army: lustration of, 96, 100, 215, 217 Arnobius, 51, 52, 459, 461, 465 Arval Brethren: see Fratres Arvales Astrology, 396-398, 401 Attalus, king of Pergamus, 330 the art of divination, 292-309; in Augustus, 35, 133, 213, 344; revival of religion, 428-447; his connec- Aust, on religion of the family, 68; Caesar, Julius belief in spells, 59; calendar, 95; pontifex maximus, Cakes: honey, 82; sacred, 83, 130, 14, 34, 38, 55, 65, 217, 225; Campus Martius, 34, 447; lustrum of Cantorelli, on the annales maximi, 290 men saeculare sung, 444-445; Cardea, 76; connection with Janus, Caristia, 418, 457 Carmen, meaning of, 186; used at saeculare, 431, 432, 439, 443-447, Carmenta, 36, 122, 297 Carter, J. B., on cult-titles, 153; on tune, 260 Cassius Hemina, 349, 356 Castor and Pollux, 231, 244; temple, 231, 244 Cato, the Censor, 121, 132, 182-184, Censors, lustrum of the, 203, 210, 215, 219 Cerealia, 100, 121, 269 Ceres, 100, 121, 139, 161, 162, 260, Chaldeans, 296; expelled from Rome, 397, 402 Charms, 59-62; see also Amulets naming of, 28-29, 42; amulets Cicero, 58, 178, 296, 309; on reli- |