Billeder på siden
PDF
ePub

made easy and comfortable, while the couple with small children can scarcely find shelter. The working members of the city family are rarely at the same task, while the worker who lives remote from his job may never see his children awake save on Sundays and holidays.

SPIRITUAL CHANGES AFFECTING THE FAMILY

After all, however, these changes are external. They remove some of the hoops which once helped bind the members of the family together, but they leave untouched the ties of affection and loyalty uniting its members. More serious are certain spiritual changes which attack the family from the inside and work against its success and stability.

One of these is the decay of religious belief. Fraternal religion is stronger than ever among us, but fewer people are willing to bear conjugal unhappiness because they believe it to be God's will. For myriads the religious sanction to marriage has crumbled away, leaving it a galling yoke if they are not well-mated.

In the latter half of the nineteenth century the reigning social philosophy in America was individualistic. In the field of domestic relations this implies: absolute freedom of matrimonial choice; mating in obedience to romantic love; marriage the opening of the door to "wedded bliss "; rights uppermost in the mind rather than duties; and slight appreciation of the significance of the family for racial and social welfare.

СНАР.

XLIX

The Faming its ReSanction

ily is Los

ligious

Individual.

ism Works

Havoc in the Family

Formerly the unity and stability of the family were achieved, Feminism not by equal sacrifices of the spouses, but chiefly by the sacrifice of the wife's wishes and personality. This is what one sees still in Central Europe and South America and even more in China. Now the education and mental emancipation of women results in the husband being called upon to bear his share of the sacrifices domestic harmony requires; but often he, bred to a belief in the superior worth of the male, refuses. Among Americans two Contendideals of the family struggle for mastery-the semi-patriarchal of Marfamily, of Roman origin and ecclesiastical sanction, based on the authority of the husband and the merging of the wife's legal personality in his, and the democratic family of Germanic origin. based on the consenting and harmonious wills of two equals. In proportion as women escape from abject mental dependence on men and find a point of view of their own, they spurn patriarchal

ing Ideals

riage

CHAP.
XLIX

Indications of Growing

Instability

in the Family

Spread of
Traits of
Character
Unfavor-

able to
Family
Stability

claims and expect marriage to be the union of equal wills. Nevertheless. many of the men they wed cherish the conviction that the husband is the rightful "head" of the family. This clash of ideals is none the less disastrous because it is but an incident of a transition process in social evolution.

SINISTER TENDENCIES

Owing to these causes we find the family now less stable than it has been at any time since the beginning of the Christian era. The development is world-wide, but it has reached its most advanced stage in the United States. Even in 1885 this country granted more divorces than all the rest of Christendom, while in 1905 it granted 68,000 divorces as against 40,000 for the rest of the Christian civilized world. At the latter date the divorce rate of the United States was twice that of Switzerland, thrice that of France, five times that of Germany and forty times that of England. In 1916 in the United States as a whole there was one divorce to every nine marriages, while in two far-Western states there was one divorce to three marriages. Between 1887 and 1906, while population gained a half, the number of divorces increased 160 per cent. It has been computed that, if the rate of increase continues, by the middle of this century a fourth of all American marriages will end in the divorce court and before the end of the century a half! The sociologist does not expect the movement to go so far but, it must be admitted, he bases his judgment on his faith in society's instinct of self-preservation rather than on anything the figures show.

It is natural that cities, always the first to quit the rut of tradition, generally show more divorce than the country. The fact that two-thirds of the divorces have been granted at the instance of the wife suggests that the tendency reflects woman's new sense of dignity and her new opportunity for self-support. Ninetyfour per cent. of the divorces are granted for such serious causes as adultery, desertion, cruelty, imprisonment for crime, drunkenness and neglect to provide. That adultery or desertion—either of which testifies that a real bond no longer exists-figures in three-fifths of the cases indicates that the prevalence of divorce is not due to the laxity of our laws as some insist, but to the decay of the virtues upon which the family rests, namely, self-sacrifice, forbearance and loyalty. These traits of the adaptive or self

subordinating type of character are yielding ground to the traits of self-interestedness, self-assertiveness and love of self-direction.

ENCOURAGING TENDENCIES

СНАР. XLIX

Extraor

dinary

ity of Mat

rimony

Let it not be supposed that a casualty rate of a ninth is the only feature of the contemporary family. In view of the increase Popularof city life, industrialism and woman's ease of self-support, the persistent vogue of matrimony is wonderful. More of the Americans are married than of any European people west of Hungary. Of our whites of native parentage only one woman in twelve and one man in eleven reaches middle age without having taken a spouse. In 1890 out of a thousand American men, 417 were single; in 1910, only 387. In 1890 out of a thousand American. women 318 were single; in 1910, only 297. Moreover, marriage Earlier now occurs earlier. The censuses since 1890, when we began to inquire into conjugal condition, reveal more people wedded before they are twenty years old, and before they are twenty-five years old.

This genial trend is due in part to the comparative ease of earning a living here, and to the small proportion of servants who, as is well known, have little opportunity to achieve a family life of their own. It owes something also to the lightening of the burden of work and of child-bearing to be shouldered by the wife. Among the native-born the worn-out mother of a dozen children is almost unknown. Although the outlook of the self-supporting spinster has brightened, that of the well-mated wife has brightened even more. The popularity of marriage reflects, furthermore, the attractiveness of a type of wedlock which constrains woman less and grants her an ampler sphere of self-determination. than any other type known to civilization.

Marriage

Encour

agements

to Mating

Canalized

In view of the remarkably low rate of illegitimacy among the Sex-Love whites here and the conspicuous faithfulness of American husbands and wives in comparison with peoples which pride themselves upon their low divorce rate, there is ground for believing that our society is more successful than any previous large society in confining sex intimacy to the legal channel appointed for it. Our reward for not making it excessively difficult for unhappy persons to escape from marriage is that, while one is in it, one is willing to abide by its rules.

It is noteworthy also that the outcry over headstrong children

CHAP.
XLIX

Fewer

[ocr errors]

spoiled" by laxity of domestic discipline is fainter now than it was a generation ago. Most of the confusion attending the de"Spoiled" cay of patriarchalism seems to have passed and the relations between parents and children appear to be established on a new and higher basis.

Children

Is a Nobler
Family

In view of these encouraging symptoms it is not unreasonable Emerging? to hope that what we are witnessing is not the disintegration of the family institution, but the transition from the old type of family, in which real incompatibility was masked by the husband's authority and the wife's submissiveness, to a nobler and more democratic type.

The Family Should

be a Socializer

The Socializing Family

Need Not be Large

MONOGAMY NECESSARY TO SOCIETY

In proportion as this approaches accomplishment the tide of divorce ought to turn, for the precarious home is bad for spouses as well as for children. To most persons love offers more happiness when the union is pervaded by a sense of finality than when it is the sport of caprice and change. In any case there is no place like a stable home for the building of social character in children. The family is, as it were, a half-way house between the ego and society. It has charge of the earlier part of the process of socialization. In it the child should slough off its naïve instinctive egoism and take its first steps in the path of love, service and self-sacrifice. In the words of Ellwood,1 "Loyalty and unselfish devotion to the larger human groups, psychology shows, cannot be effectively developed without first developing loyalty to those smaller groups which call forth the instinctive affections of the child. The attachments developed in the family make possible and actually strengthen the attachments to larger groups. Hence, where family sentiments are strong, there one usually finds strong patriotism and strong social sympathies in general.”

To discharge this beneficent office it is not necessary that the family be large. With parents of the right kind and with enough children of the right age accessible in the neighborhood nursery, kindergarten, or playground, the three-child family may socialize its members quite as thoroughly as the family with a dozen.

It is true that in a caste order the House or Family Line is a rival of society and monopolizes the love and loyalty which ought 1" The Social Problem," p. 199.

to be shared with one's fellows. But the simple democratic family constituted only of parents and ungrown children can be no serious competitor of society. Provided it pulsates to humanitarian ideas, it ought to prove a school of social service.

MEANS OF COMBATING THE INSTABILITY OF THE FAMILY

СНАР.

XLIX

Legisla

tion Can

not Cure

Family In

For about thirty years the drift of American divorce legisla- Restrictive tion has been in the direction of greater restriction. The fact that neither this nor increasing uniformity of law as between the states has reduced the divorce rate suggests that the remedy must reach stability the deep-lying cause, which is the mental attitude of the married. toward their relation.

Now that for innumerable young people marriage has no religious sanction, it is essential that they be imbued with the ethical conception of marriage. The romantic conception from the principle "Love cannot be forced" deduces that the newly-wedded can only hope that the attachment will last, but that they can do nothing to keep it alive. Experience shows, however, that willattitude is a very essential thing in a lasting and happy union. If lovers enter upon marriage with a lively sense of obligation and with a firm resolve to make such sacrifices as may be necessary to insure its success, their attachment is far more likely to endure than if they obey only their impulses. So fine a thing as the concord of two persons living one life is rarely to be had without determined effort. Sex attraction fluctuates and its contribution to conjugal harmony is uncertain. On the other hand, admiration, respect, and the sense of duty stabilize the bond of senti

ment.

Importance in

Marriage
Will-atti-

of Initial

tude

Public

Opinion

Divorce

No doubt it would be well if young people were taught to look upon divorce as a moral shipwreck rather than an incident in sex may Curb adventure. Pride, selfishness and want of self-control ought not to escape condemnation when masquerading behind the excusing phrase, "incompatibility of temper." There is no reason why divorce should not bring upon those responsible for it as deep mortification as the confession of bankruptcy brings upon insolvent business men.

Marriage

Not chiefly because sex love is naturally a tricky and mercurial Ethical thing do marriages fail, but because the husbands and wives have the wrong attitude toward their undertaking. What, therefore, is necessary that they should embark on it possessed of concep

« ForrigeFortsæt »