but one alternative, and that if the country does not rid itself of the debt, the debt will destroy the country, we must submit, cost what it will, to pay it off.

The military peace establishment of Great Britain and Ireland in 1792, was fixed at 27,000 regular troops; and the whole aggregate force employed at home and in the colonies, only amounted to 44,000, and the expense to about two millions. Now, however, exclusive of a yeomanry force of between 60,000 and 70,000, which had no existence previous to the late war, we maintain 60,000 regular troops in England and Ireland only; and the entire expense of the military department is at least equal to seven millions! Here, certainly, a radical reform is imperatively necessary. We do not think it too much to affirm, that the army expenses might be reduced a full half, without occasioning the least injury to the public service. It is a monstrous absurdity to contend, that four times the force which sufficed to preserve the tranquillity of the country, in very critical circumstances, and when the public mind was powerfully excited by the French Revolution, should be necessary in a period of profound peace, and when legitimacy is every where triumphant. Such an excess of force is not only uncalled for and unnecessary, and in the highest degree unconstitutional, but is altogether incommensurate with the means of the country. A rigid economy is in every government the first of virtues in ours, it is the most pressing of duties.

In addition to the retrenchments which might be effected, not in the military only, but in every other branch of the public expenditure; a very great reduction of the duties upon those various commodities, whose prime cost does not exceed the power of the great body of the people to become purchasers, might be made, without occasioning any diminution of the revenue. When the real price, or the cost of production, of any commodity, is so great that it can only be purchased by the rich and wealthy classes, no reduction of duties could greatly extend its consumption. But it is otherwise with the commodities alluded to, which are in general request. In such circumstances, a reduction of any heavy duty by which they may be burdened, would prodigiously extend their consumption; and, without diminishing the revenue, would add to the comforts and enjoyments of all. This does not rest on theory only. Previous to 1744, the East India Company's sales of Teas amounted to no more than about 600,000 lbs. weight annually; producing a revenue of about £140,000. In the early part of 1745, an act was passed, by which the tea-duties were very greatly reduced; and, in 1746, the sales amounted to nearly two millions of pounds weight, and the revenue to £228,000. But this unanswerable demonstration, of the superior advantages resulting to the revenue itself from low duties, was unable to restrain the rapacity of the Treasury. In 1748 the

duties were again increased; and fluctuated between that epoch and 1784, from 64 to 119 per cent. In the last-mentioned year, however, the Government, having in vain tried every other means to prevent the smuggling and adulteration of tea, reduced the duty from 119 to 12 per cent.: And the revenue, instead of falling off in the proportion of one to ten, owing to the increased consumption, only declined in the proportion of one to three. The shortsightedness of ministers, and the narrow and contracted policy on which they have almost always acted, put it out of our power to refer to many such conclusive instances to prove the superior productiveness of diminished taxation: there are, however, one or two others which deserve to be pointed out. In 1787, the duty on wine and spirits was lowered 50 per cent.; but the revenue was, notwithstanding, considerably augmented. The average annual produce of the tax on coffee, for the three years previous to 1808, amounted to £166,000. In the course of that year, the duty was reduced from 2s. to 7d. the cwt.; and the average annual produce of the reduced duty for the next three years, instead of being diminished, rose to £195,000!-showing that the consumption had been increased in a quadruple proportion, and that the comforts of the people had been materially increased.

It is plain, therefore, that a very considerable deduction might be made from some of the most oppressive duties, without occasioning any diminution of the revenue. Nor do we think that it is too much to expect that, although 50 per cent. were deducted from the duties on salt, tea, leather, soap, spirits, beer, French wines, &c., the revenue, instead of being diminished, would be increased. Whether these anticipations should be realized or not, it is indispensable that Taxation should be diminished. Instead of attempting to raise the revenue to the level of our present unmeasured expenditure, we must reduce our expenditure to the altered circum stances of the country, and make it quadrate with our diminished income.

ART. IV. A Guide to the Electors of Great Britain upon the Accession of a New King, and the immediate prospect of a New Parliament. Third edition, 8vo. pp. 56. London, 1820.

It is long, indeed, since so excellent a Pamphlet has appeared upon any political subject, as the one now before us. The public having already pronounced a decisive opinion in its favour, by exhausting two editions during the bustle and distractions of a General Election, we may be thought to undertake a needless task in professing to describe its merits; but we owe it as a debt of grati

tude to the author, for the light he has thrown upon questions highly important, and hitherto treated with vague and unprofitable declamation on the one side, or mysteriously wrapt up in the obscurity of official details upon the other. The author is, we believe, pretty generally known to be Mr. Creevey, a Member of Parlia ment for many years; during which he so highly and so usefully distinguished himself as the friend of rational reforms, the advocate of sound constitutional principles, and the unsparing enemy of abuse, that his exclusion from the House of Commons must now be regarded as a serious public loss; more especially at a period when those questions are to be brought under review, with which he, more than any other man, had shown himself intimately acquainted.

The beginning of a New Reign, as the reader probably knows, brings forward one of the most momentous subjects on which the representatives of the people can at any time be called to deliberate, the formation of the Civil List, that is, the arrangement of nearly the whole civil expenses of the country, including the charges of executing the Laws at home, representing it abroad, and providing for the support, the dignity, and the splendour of the Crown. In the ancient times of the Monarchy, the Sovereign, who was rather the first of the feudal Barons than the ruler of a great People, derived his revenues chiefly from land vested in him as a great proprietor, and from certain occasional perquisites given to him for the better support of his office; and, it may be added, that the services which his vassals were bound to perform in war, or to redeem with money, helped him mainly to defray its expenses. On extraordinary occasions, taxes were levied directly upon the subject; but the bulk of the revenue was that which the King derived from his Possessions and his Prerogative, independent of any consent of Parliament for raising it, and of any control in its expenditure. In return for the funds thus vested in the Crown, it was bound to defray all the expenses of the State in peace and war: and while the hereditary revenues remained entire, and the feudal services belonged to them, the Sovereigns of this country could well support this burden. Repeated dilapidations, however, reduced the former in process of time; and as the feudal scheme fell into disuse, the other great branch of the Monarch's resources was lopt off also; so that from time to time he was, happily for the liberties of the nation, compelled to ask supplies from Parliament; and, by degrees, one after the other, all the great branches of public expenditure were transferred from the Crown to the Country.

The Sovereign being thus exonerated from his payments, it was natural to expect that he should also relinquish those funds which had been allotted to him to make those payments; that having

no longer, for example, to pay the Army and Navy, he should no longer retain the perquisites of Admiralty and Prize which had been destined to support those services, but should transfer to the public, to whose shoulders he had shifted the burden, those profits which are inseparably connected with it. This part of the process, however, was altogether omitted. Notions of right and prerogative were conveniently enough introduced. The King was said to have those branches of revenue by a high title, and that they were inherent in the Crown by virtue of his Royal prerogative; no account being taken of the material circumstance, that, while so possessed by the Crown, they had been burdened with disbursements now undertaken by the State.-The worst of the whole, wardship, or the King's right of seizing or granting the guardianship and estates of infants,-purveyance, or the power of seizing cattle, carriages, and provisions for the Royal household, -and the various feudal incidents of tenure by Knight's service, were so extremely oppressive, that the full exercise of them could not be borne; and even a mitigated exercise was wholly destructive of liberty. Early in James I.'s reign, we accordingly find a treaty entered into between Parliament and the Crown, by which a commutation was intended to be stipulated; and the learned, ingenious, and indefeasible Monarch estimated the value of his right by a sufficiently recondite process of calculation. He observed, that there were Nine Muses, the patronesses of poets, who were always poor; therefore, he must have more than nine score thousand pounds by the year, which the Commons had tendered him; also, there were Eleven Apostles, deducting Judas, as unfit to be named among honourable contracting parties. Now, it was plain that ten, the medium between the Muses and Apostles, even if it were not also the number of the Commandments, ought to be the sum chosen :-and to this the Commons, moved by his Majesty's great wit and solid judgment, assented:-So that, had the treaty been concluded, he would have had £200,000 a year, in lieu of the remaing feudal perquisites of the Crown. Upon the Restoration, in 1660, Charles II., desiring to gain the affections of his subjects, renewed the negociation; and the memorable act was passed, abolishing the Court of Wards, Purveyance, &c. ; in return for which, an hereditary Excise was settled on the Sovereign, besides other grants for his life; out of which he was to defray both the charges of his household and family, and those of the Civil government of the country. This is the first instance of any thing like an arrangement of the Civil List. In James II.'s reign, a similar provision was continued; and in the reigns of William and Anne, a more regular plan was pursued, which has ever since been followed, of voting, at the accession of each Sovereign, a certain yearly sum, to continue during the reign, to cover all the expenses of the Royal VOL. I.

41

household and family, and many of the changes connected with the Civil government of the country.

In consideration of these grants for life, each succeeding Sovereign has given up all claim to those branches of the separate property of the Crown, which are technically termed its Hereditary Revenue; that is, the Crown lands, the hereditary Excise, first granted in Charles II.'s time, in lieu of Warding and Purveyance, and the smaller branches arising from fines, &c. But, by some strange accident, very considerable branches of revenue, or perquisites exactly of the same nature, have been kept separate, and retained by the Crown, notwithstanding the provision made by the country both for the household and for all the other branches of the public service, formerly supported out of those hereditary and separate funds. It is hardly necessary to remark, how wide and dangerous a door is thus opened to abuse, by the sums thus intrusted to the Crown and its ministers, without any Parliamentary grant or control, and expended without even the form of laying estimates before the House of Commons. Other inroads of abuse are to be found in the Pension List, which the Executive government is permitted to fill up to a large amount, without any check from Parliamentary investigation and nothing can be more manifest, than the inconsistency of the whole Civil List arrangement with the present form of the Constitution, and the shape into which the finances of the country have, for nearly a century and a half, been moulded. A new reign necessarily brings forward this question in all its bearings; and a new Parliament as necessarily is summoned to form the plan for the King's life.

At this particular period, therefore, Mr. Creevey takes his stand, and addresses his countrymen upon a subject important in every point of view, whether we regard its financial or its constitutional bearings. It cannot be doubted that his Tract possesses very great merit. The argument is conducted with a degree of plainness, and force, and manliness seldom to be met in union with so much temper and moderation. The arrangement is lucid and natural; the topics succeed one another in great abundance, and with striking rapidity; there is nothing superfluous, and nothing left unexplained. The style is admirable; clearness, precision, and the excellent taste which consists in avoiding all ornament where the subject requires none, as well as where it admits none -are the characteristics of this pamphlet; which deserves to be placed along with the celebrated political writings of Dean Swiftonly that its matter is far more important, and its principles more enlarged. We hasten to present the reader with an abstract of so striking and useful a composition; premising, that though it was published in the contemplation of a general election, as a guide to electors, it is now addressed, with equal propriety, to the Members