Postpositivism and Educational Research
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000 - 101 sider
This volume presents in a forthright and lively way, an account of the philosophical position generally identified as 'Postpositivistic' that undergirds much of mainstream research in education and the related social sciences. The discussion throughout is informed by recent developments in philosophy of science. Authors D. C. Phillips and Nicholas C. Burbules cite a number of interesting examples from the educational research and evaluation literature to illustrate the value of a scientific approach. Many educational researchers aspire to carry out rigorous or disciplined inquiry aimed at producing accurate (and generally 'truthful') accounts of educational phenomena and the causal psychological or social processes that lay behind them. However, many recent critics have argued that it is a mistake to believe that research can yield theories, or advance claims that are true, objective, and value-neutral. In other words, that researchers always work within frameworks that embody important (and often questionable) assumptions about values and the nature of human knowledge. This book argues that, while there is much to be learned from recent critiques, traditional scientific values and assumptions are not outmoded. The authors show students how to implement and benefit from the scientific method in ways that take into account recent critiques.
Hvad folk siger - Skriv en anmeldelse
Vi har ikke fundet nogen anmeldelser de normale steder.
Philosophical Commitments of Postpositivist Researchers
Objectivity Relativity and Value Neutrality
Can and Should Educational Inquiry be Scientific?
1 andre sektioner vises ikke
Andre udgaver - Se alle
accepted actions answer approach argue argument asked behavior beliefs Benny biased called causal certainly chapter claim classroom clear clearly concerned consequences course criticism Denis describe determine discussion earlier educational research effect evidence example experience explain fact factors false field give human hypothesis ideal identified important individuals influence inquiry interest internal interpretation involved issue knowledge laws learning least logical matter meaning measure methods nature neutrality objectivity observational operating particular performed perhaps person phenomena philosophers physical play Popper position positivism positivist possible postpositivists present Press problems produce questions reality reason regarded relevant role scientific scientists seems sense situation social science society sometimes strong suggest teacher theory things thought tion true truth turn understand University values warranted