...Southern Pacific Terminal doctrine might permit a departure from "[t]he usual rule in federal cases . . . that an actual controversy must exist at stages of...and not simply at the date the action is initiated." Roc v. H'arfr. supra, at 123: L'nitell State* v. Munninyiriar. J,n:.. 340 US 36 (1950). Because the...

...Southern Pacific Terminal doctrine might permit a departure from "[t]he usual rule in federal cases . . . that an actual controversy must exist at stages of...and not simply at the date the action is initiated." Roe v. Wade, supra, at 125; United States v. Munsingwcar, Inc., 340 US 36 (1950). Because the petitioner...

..."[t]he usual rule i federal cases . . . that an actual controversy must exist at stages of appelltt or certiorari review, and not simply at the date the action is initiated." ftae ' Wndc. »upra, at 125; United Mate* v. Munsingirear. Inc.. 340 T'.S. 36 (1950).: Hecause the...

...Southern Pacific Terminal doctrine might permit a departure from "[t]he usual rule in federal cases . . . that an actual controversy must exist at stages of...and not simply at the date the action is initiated." Roe v. Wade, supra, at 125; United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 US 36 (1950). Because the petitioner...

...be moot because she and all other members of her class are no longer subject to any 1970 pregnancy. The usual rule in federal cases is that an actual...the date the action is initiated. United States v. Munsinowear, Inc., 340 US 36 (1950) ; Golden v. Zwickler, supra; SEC v. Medical Committee for Human...

...July date appears to be the time of the rejmrter's transcription. See Apiwndix, at 77. 10 ROE i'. WADE The usual rule in federal cases is that an actual...and not simply at the date the action is initiated. I'nited States v. Munxingwear, Inc.. 340 US 36 ( 1950) ; Golden v. Zwickler, supra; SEC \. Medical...

...the rcjMirtor's transcription. See Appendix, at 77. 10 ROE ii. WADE The usual rule in federal eases is that an actual controversy must exist at stages...and not simply at the date the action is initiated. I' trited States \. Munsingwear, Inc.. MO US 36 ( 1950) ; (roldcn v. Zwickler, supra; SEC v. Medical...

...July date appears to be the time of the reporter's transcription. See Ap[>endix, at 77. 10 ROE v. WADE The usual rule in federal cases is that an actual controversy must exist at stapes of appellate or cortiorari review, and not simply at the date the action is initiated. I'nited...

...Because, in my view, the Court's decision is demonstrably in error, I respectfully dissent. I Mootness. "The usual rule in federal cases is that an actual...and not simply at the date the action is initiated." Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113, 125, 93 S.Ct. 705, 712, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973). In the absence of a live controversy,...

...Because, in my view, the Court's decision is demonstrably in error, 1 respectfully dissent. I Mootnns. "IV usual rule in federal cases is that an actual controversy must exist at stages of appellate or certioran review and not simply at the date the action is initiated." Rot v. Wade, 410 US 113, 125,...