International Judicial Review: When Should International Courts Intervene?Cambridge University Press, 5. mar. 2020 - 170 sider This book is motivated by a question: when should international courts intervene in domestic affairs? To answer this question thoroughly, the book is broken down into a series of separate inquiries: when is intervention legitimate? When can international courts identify good legal solutions? When will intervention initiate useful processes? When will it lead to good outcomes? These inquiries are answered based on reviewing judgments of international courts, strategic analysis, and empirical findings. The book outlines under which conditions intervention by international courts is recommended and evaluates the implications that international courts have on society. |
Andre udgaver - Se alle
International Judicial Review: When Should International Courts Intervene? Shai Dothan Begrænset visning - 2020 |
International Judicial Review: When Should International Courts Intervene? Shai Dothan Begrænset visning - 2020 |
International Judicial Review: When Should International Courts Intervene? Shai Dothan Ingen forhåndsvisning - 2022 |
Almindelige termer og sætninger
ability actions actually admissibility adopt advantage allows analysis apply argued arguments behavior better Chapter choice choose commit comparative complementarity compliance consider Convention corrupt countries crimes Criminal criticism decide decision deliberation democratic deterred doctrine domestic ECHR effect emerging consensus Europe European example expansive interpretation exposed face fact follow give Human Rights important improve incentive independently interests international courts international law interpretation intervention involved issue join judges judgment judicial jurisdiction Jury Theorem lawyers lead limited majority margin of appreciation national courts NGOs Note obligations parties policies political possible practices preferences prevent primacy principles prisoners probability of prosecution problem protect protocol reason reports represent reputational require result rule rule of law Scholars sham trials social soldiers sometimes specific Statute suggests treaty United Kingdom usually violation vote